Leadership Versus Manager: Leader Vs. Manager

Managers implement a company’s vision and strategic plan, whereas, leaders create and articulate that vision and plan. There are five approaches to leadership. They are trait theory, behavioral theory, situational theory, transformational theory and three additional perspectives, known as leader,

Path goal theory thoroughly examined the relationship between leaders and followers. It examine how leaders motivate subordinates in pursuit of objectives. It implied that leadership is not enforced on subordinates but exercised in conjunction with them, recognising that often leadership is wanted by those that are led, not imposed on them. Path goal theory emphasise on directive leadership which involved clear command, recognise and assign tasks, indicating how and when the task to be completed and the standards expected. This is a style of leadership that is familiar to most commanders and leaders.

Among other things, it predicts that directive leadership is effective with ambiguous tasks, that supportive leadership is effective with repetitive tasks, that participative leadership is effective when tasks are unclear and subordinates are autonomous, and that achievement-oriented leadership is effective for challenging tasks. By taking the Path-Goal Leadership Questionnaire, I know that which way suit me to lead my followers. In my case, I score 27 in participative, which is the highest of four options. As a participative leader, I do reference the suggestions from the followers for making decisions sometimes but not always. Sometimes the leaders’ behaviors depend on the characteristic of the subordinates and tasks.

These leaders are more qualified as they need to be patient in teaching and building a good relationship with their employees. How well a manager does and how well he is being used to the fullest depends on the situation he is placed in. In path-goal theory, it is stated that leaders can increase subordinate satisfaction and performance by clarifying and clearing the paths to goals, and by increasing the number and kinds of rewards available

CAN A MANAGER BECOME A GOOD LEADER SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CONCEPT It is important to distinguish an effective manager and a good leader, also to recognise the concept of being a good leader as well as an effective manager, managers aspiring to become a leader can benefit from acquiring leadership skills, a good leader possess several qualities that could easily be termed as good managerial skills. Hence a leader must be well developed physically, mentally and intellectually to be able to assume such positions. In this current challenging world is crucial for every manager to possess excellent management skills and develop exemplifying qualities of a good leader.

1) Introduction Management and leadership practices are helpful and useful to individual's prosperity and that of our organization. Leadership and management theories concentrate on what qualities recognize and distinguish between leaders and followers in an organisation. Leadership can be characterized as a procedure by which an individual impacts others to accomplish a target and coordinates the organization in a way that makes it more coherent and cohesive. On the off chance that you have the longing and willpower, you can turn into an effective leader. Great leaders are creating and developing through a ceaseless procedure of self-study, experience, training and education.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP It is important to appreciate that leadership roles are different from management functions. In Stephen Covey’s (1999) book The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, he quoted Peter Drucker as saying: ‘Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; leadership is about determining whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall.’ This suggests that management is about tasks, whereas leadership is about perception, judgement, skill and philosophy.

However, nowadays groups, companies and organizations need both powerful leaders and managers to produce desired results. Moreover, Abraham Zaleznik (1977) discussed the parallel between leaders and managers and mentioned that they both make a valuable contribution to an organization; although, each one’s contribution is different (Lunenburg, 2011). While some obvious similarities can be found between leadership and management, there are also some noteworthy differences, as previously stated. The purpose of this essay is to clarify the relationship between leadership and management based on existing literature.

Leadership: Definition Leadership is the process of influencing the motive of the employees and so directing, guiding them to the proper completion of the short-term goals and the mission, vision of the firm. Leadership referring to achieve a specific set of goals of the business enterprise by minimizing risk and more advantage of opportunities is also called Entrepreneurial Leadership (Rao, 2015). Today leadership is such an iterative process when the leaders should have a variety of qualities and expertise in different area of management. Here, different theories will be explained which can clearly identify the scope, the responsibilities and the area of expertise required to be successful leader.

This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.

This report will discuss the use of Six Sigma as an approach to improving business strategies and developing an organisations perceived “excellence”. It will investigate the criteria and definitions of the European Foundation for Quality management (EFQM) and assess the advantages and disadvantages of combining Six Sigma with the EFQM business model. 2 Introduction EFQM is a non-profit foundation that strives to assist organizations in creating an environment in which they can thrive in the field of “excellence”. The EFQM business model offers an outline that encourages collaboration and innovation between different businesses, sharing ideas and best practises to be able to compete on a global scale . This rounded and open approach means

The managers specialize in setting a positive bench- mark around the boundaries for their teams and also individuals.. On the other hand leaders have well defined objectives and they lead the teams to achieve those objectives. Leaders not set up goals but also have to lead the teams in new directions. lead their teams to achieve objectives. Leaders should have a vision, mission and ability to lead their teams from the front.

Personal strengths are actions or tasks that a person can perform well. These strengths comprise talents, skills and knowledge. A person uses these traits and abilities in his daily life to accomplish tasks, relate with others, and to achieve goals.  Everyone has their own set of strengths. Our personal strengths are that vital aspect that makes us unique as individual, and it is part of the value we offer to the world around us.

The Big Short Management and Leadership Theoretical Component Management – The process of dealing with or controlling things or people. Leadership - The action of leading a group of people or an organization, or the ability to do this. Management and Leadership are two very different things. “A manager is appointed in a position of authority which enables him to insist on people doing as he/she instructs.

Goal of this theory is to improve fulfillment and functioning of followers (Northouse, 2016). The Path-Goal Leadership Questionnaire I scored a 21 on the directive style, 24 on the supportive style, 24 on the participative style, and 20 on the achievement-oriented style. The common score for directive style is 23 and 18 is considered low. I fell in the middle of common and low for directive style.