There is another explanation of why legalese looks, feels, and sounds different from other kinds of writing. That explanation has to do with the way language functions in specific contexts. Indeed, language functions only in specific contexts and never, in a vacuum. What is commonly referred to as "language" is the sum total of varieties of language in different contexts. These contexts can be social, regional, or linguistic. Linguists refer to the social and regional varieties of language as dialects, while contextually determined language is known as "register." Legal English is a distinct linguistic register, even as literary, technical, and philosophical applications of the English language are distinct registers; each has its own peculiarities of syntax and vocabulary. These linguistic features can be described precisely in each case and can be predicted, at least in prose writing. But to be "predictable" in this sense is not tantamount to being mediocre; it only refers to the stylistic characteristics of a variety of …show more content…
The importance of language for man and society cannot be reduced. As a personal thing, language is not only a mode of communication between individuals but is also a way for the expression of their personality. Sociologically, language moulds the individual from infancy. The child comes to know most of the things of the world through language. Probably the early men had to undergo the same labour in learning the speech which a child has now to undergo in learning its mother-tongue, but with this difference that primitive man was a grown child who painfully elaborated a language for himself whereas the individual child has but to acquire and learn a language already
Imagine yourself throwing a plastic ring from a six pack of soda on the ground. Next, picture that same piece of plastic that was thrown on the ground wrapped around a sea otters neck, and it being trapped. Makes you want to pick up that plastic ring, doesn’t it? Frank Trippett in his article, “A Red Light for Scofflaws” argues that social order is broken when citizens who normally would obey the law become scofflaws. The author starts by explaining which laws he believes that are most broken everyday.
My rhetorical situation for this argument is to bring to light the corruption of the Michigan Judicial system, focused more on Sobriety Court. My audience is directed towards students and instructors at NMC. My stance is that the Sobriety Court system needs to be more supportive to their partakers. My context is derived from a personal experience with my topic.
The English Only movement has been around for a long time, but it has been overlooked by most. Most Americans speak English from the moment they learned to talk; many others learn English as a second language. For this reason, many Americans oppose to the existence of non-English languages being spoken in the United States. In Warren J. Blumenfeld’s essay “‘English Only’ Laws Divide and Demean”, the author speaks about the “English Only” Movement and how people who support and oppose it feel towards this situation. He uses rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos in order to make people understand the severity of the situation and for the writing to have an effect on its readers.
On February 22, 2017, I had the pleasure of hearing Attorney Carlos Moore speak at the “Activism as an Attorney” event at the University of Mississippi. Dr. Moore spoke about his personal experiences as a civil rights attorney. He encouraged his audience to always take a stand and never be afraid to fight for what is right regardless of the presented circumstances. He even stated that, “If God brings you to it, he will bring you through it.” Without hesitation, Dr. Moore explained how African-Americans deserved the right to be treated as first class citizens because we are just as good as anyone else.
Nnabugo Obichere #29 Mrs. Davis AP Language 1/A 10 October 2016 Classwork Essay Any reader would be able to tell at least one thing after reading this excerpt from Welty’s autobiography. That these memories clearly meant a lot to her.
As discussed in the article by Clive Thompson, many people use different ways of speaking. Based on text conversations, social media posts, and comments language has made a drastic change. TBH grammar has made like a huge change on society. Lookin at billboards and social media, people post is a totally diff manner than speaking. Lol I remember the last conversation I had with my aunt that lives in Charleston, SC.
While some may be inclined to believe certain dialects, (southern, Boston, etc.,) simply demonstrate improper English and grammar, these ways of speaking more often than not follow specific rules and tendencies as concrete as those in standard written English. However, those who are not in tune with the language style of the group typically get treated as outsiders. Furthermore, language transcends just written and spoken word, the content, and style with which a particular group chooses to portray themselves represent the likeness in thought and emotion among its members. In effect, the difference in commonly spoken dialect can form a rift between individuals.
The way people speak has to do with the community they grew up in, along with the phrases and accents that they use, which is affected by the region that an individual lives in. In America, there are many diverse dialects possibly because of the numerous cultures brought from the immigrants that came to America. As Walt Whitman said, “Viewed freely, the English language is the accretion and growth of every dialect, race, and range of time, and is both free and compacted composition of all.” There are many different regions of American English. One of them is called the Pacific Southwest, a region that covers California.
Language can be defined as, “the learned system of arbitrary vocal symbols, by means of which human beings, as members of a society, interact and communicate in terms of their culture" (Leap 209). Language is not just the words a person chooses to speak. Language is much deeper. Language ties many different generations together and that is how people can share history. Unfortunately, “the profile of Indian language fluency among the adult members of a tribal community rarely predicts how familiar with the language the younger members of the tribe will be” (Vizenor 218).
America is a country of diversity. Our country has various cultures, ethnicities, races, and traditions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor of the US Supreme Court identifies with this diversity, as she is a Latina American. In order to speak about diversity and embracing culture, Sotomayor gave a speech named “A Latina Judge’s Voice” in 2001 when she was an appeals-court judge. She uses an abundance of rhetorical strategies to convince her audience to agree that individuals can develop their own identity through many outlets, but they also can embrace their familial cultures and traditions.
Well correct me if I’m wrong but it sounded like you were concerned that other inmates would stop being your friends. So you in return ignored everyone because you were unsure if you could trust anyone. When this random inmate talked to you and realized you were absent you unconsciously thought that not all inmates would stop being friends with you? This is just a thought but I just want to know what you think?
Sydney Groves What rhetorical choices do Judge Sotomayor use to convey her message regarding her identity? In her 2009 speech “A Latina Judge’s Voice,” the Honorable Sonia Sotomayor accentuates how her personal experiences as a Puerto Rican daughter living in a diverse nation cultivated her own identity. Sotomayor argues that different cultural identities should not be categorized unambiguously when referring to recent disputes between adopting a culturally homogenous or heterogeneous society. Through a diverse utilization of creative diction, vivid narratives, and directly addressing the audience, she establishes a candid tone to influence the perspective of those in the federal judiciary. Judge Sotomayor begins her speech by supporting
Throughout generations cultural traditions have been passed down, alongside these traditions came language. The language of ancestors, which soon began to be molded by the tongue of newer generations, was inherited. Though language is an everlasting changing part of the world, it is a representation of one’s identity, not only in a cultural way but from an environmental standpoint as well. One’s identity is revealed through language from an environmental point of view because the world that one is surrounded with can cause them to have their own definitions of words, an accent, etc. With newer generations, comes newer forms of languages.
Dialects are not just accents but also grammar, vocabulary, syntax and common expressions used. One is able to identify and distinguish between different people, different ethnicities and races as people speak different languages. Each human belongs to a community which makes them speak a specific language and dialect that represent their community and differentiates them from others. Language connects people to their community as they are connected to people that speak the same
In the social life, language and society are two things that support each other. It is impossible if there is society without language and there is language without society, because language is a device to communicate one to another (Adam J.H, 1982; 3). There is the study to organize between language and the society that is called sociolinguistics.