Law is an important component of any form of civilization. India being a huge country with diverse cultures and traditions has a very comprehensive but also very brief constitution in which the law is written. As India is very diverse, the framers of the law, also known as, the framers of the constitution have made sure that the laws are in the interest of all the citizens in India. The law in India has evolved over the years and has changed rapidly during the social reforms period and also during the freedom struggle of 1947. The legal system can be dated back to the early civilisations such as the Indus valley civilization and almost back to the Vedic ages. A rudimental type of legal system was followed during those times with specific, qualified …show more content…
It consisted of the Panchayat and a group of people who were well versed in the law and were residing in the village. There was also the question of age that came into play and members were elected accordingly. Settlements brought about by these legal bodies such as the Panchayat was honoured and was very rarely opposed by others.After the 1950s, the Indian legal system took a new direction and added the fundamental rights and duties into its constitution which was adopted from the American constitution. The post-independence period was the main time period that led to the growth of the legal system in India. In the book, the author describes the growth of the legal system to a tree. He says,” …. The legal system in India has grown over the years, …show more content…
He says that these were added to instruct the government, especially the judiciary, how to function and has also given a clear and brief aspect of what has to be done in each case and circumstance. The directive principles of state policy are found in Part IV Articles 38 to 51 and the public interest litigation is mentioned in the Articles 39(e), 47 and 48-A. One of the other topics that the author discusses in his book is about “Prospective Overruling.” Prospective Overruling was adopted from the constitution of America which was first adapted in India by Chief Justice Subha Rao with 11 other judges. Few of the laws that were mentioned in the constitution that were amended were declared to continue to be valid on the adaptation of Prospective
Arrested after 36 patients died, Narendra Nagareddy had been held at his office following a raid from DEA agent. Around 12 of the 36 patients died from an overdose. Almost 40 federal and local agents raided his Jonesboro office as they seized even more assets at his home. As a psychiatrist of Jonesboro, Nagareddy has been over prescribing benzodiazepine and opiates for the last several years, which has led to multiple overdoses and deaths. People have come to Nagareddy for help, but instead of receiving help, they are met with deadly consequences.
I find myself writing you asking for guidance within the walls of the 12th Justice System. My daughter continues to be in the middle of ledge issues with the adopted mother of my granddaughter. However, this is a family matter, in which we will have to figure out on our end.
Two other distinguished growth happened in capital punishment law during this time. One was limiting the offenses for which a respondent might face the capital punishment; these considerations tended to vary by region. A second growth was the abolition movement. Beginning with State
From the failure of the Articles, should the new government, the Constitution, be approved? In 1788, the Constitution was created as the Articles of Confederation wasn’t successful and strong enough for their new government. During that time, a debate went throughout America about the Constitution whether to ratify it or not. Yes, the Constitution should be ratified because a Bill of Rights was promised, no one overpowered (in the government; checks and balances), and it is fair to both citizens and officials. Starting off, a bill of rights was promised which would ensure many things for the citizens.
The Constitution of the United States created in 1787 provided the framework for an egalitarian society where every free white male had equal representation and therefore promoted social happiness. However, in 1787 there were many groups of people in the newly formed United States of America that were not addressed, or even disenfranchised by the new Constitution. This included slaves, free women, and American Indians. Whereas free white males had their liberties fully expressed by the constitution including fair and equal representation, social happiness should include every group within the United States as every person in the States should have a say in government.
Legal history A system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties, this is the definition of law. Although the definition of law is evident and perceptible,the portrayal and act of law varies. Throughout the justice system there are many inconsistencies such as the type of law, there is common,criminal,civil, and administrative. Throughout these systems of law there are also criminal proceedings. In these criminal proceedings, some will find that the verdict is just.
The biggest difference between the court systems and juries then and now is that the Catholic Church had a lot of say in court decisions. Prior to the 12th century, the Catholic church dominated the legal system. The church had say in what punishments were acceptable and
In America, the judiciary has a legal system that helps solve any personal, economic, social, and political problems or cases. These cases are withheld in a court and presented to a judge and either a grand, petite, or hung jury to finalize their jurisdiction on the problem. In this essay, I will explain the structure of the Texas court system and their type of cases. To start, civil and criminal cases are two types of cases in this legal system. Civil cases handle private rights and remedies, personal injury suits, divorces, child custodies, or breach-of-contracts.
They would have certain classes. Upper and common class. This made things very different for each class. The richer people did not receive worse punishments because they had money to not be tortured. Certain punishments were followed out for different crime.
Throughout the rule of the British in India, Europeans mainly controlled the government and police force, leaving the Indians with no voice and no protection. According to Dr. Lalvani, the British established an efficient administration over 500 million people. While this was beneficial to the British, the Indians had no control over the taxations and laws that affected them (Doc. #2). Since all of these laws and taxes were targeted to help the British, India’s freedom was stolen, as shown in the Rowlatt Act, a law that allowed the government to imprison people without trial.
The judicial branch of Canada has played one of the most unique roles in history due to their shaping of Canada. The decisions rendered by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (hereby referred to as the JCPC) and the Supreme Court of Canada impacted the values of Canadian citizens. These decisions were often contradictory and exposed the legal system as flawed, inflexible and stubborn. Throughout the decades the judiciary sought to maintain rules crafted by the Fathers of Confederation in 1867, rather than adopt more effective standards for judgement. The Canadian federal and provincial powers were broken into sections 91 and 92 in the British North America Act of 1867.
The laws stand as a basic understanding of right from wrong and allowed civilizations to keep the most peace among their people as they
Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.
Their focus did not adequately pertain to the actual implementation of these laws. He places emphasis upon the relationship to democracies. He details how in a democracy, it is ruled by all the population, and people elected by them. It is thus full of compromises.
What I will explain to you in this article will, how we are connected with the law and I hope, make you see sense in the importance of our laws in the society we live in. To be against the importance of laws in our society would show one to be ignorant and naïve. I encounter the law on a daily basis when I am driving. I have to follow the speed limit of each road, I have to signal before changing lanes, my vehicle must be in good condition in order to safely drive and I must obey all road signs as they are set in place to ensure the safety of everybody.