ipl-logo

Leo Szilard Violations

564 Words3 Pages

Leo Szilard "A Petition to the President of the United States" article, published in Atomicarchive.com. 2011. Web. 11 May 2012, Szilard express concern regarding the use of the atomic bomb against Japan fearing what type of repercussions will bring to the welfare of the American Nation. Szilard a pioneer in the field of atomic power with 59 of his fellow scientist understands how this new type of power will be evolving continuously with the course of its development. Szilard made compelling point regarding how this weapon could be used against America and how will endanger the welfare of the nation. In this essay, I will be explaining why I think Leo Szilard does a great job in providing an argument that should stop the use of atomic bombs. …show more content…

To be able to use the appeal Szilard uses his credibility as a subject matter expert and involvement on the atomic project to make his petition more creditable. How the knowledge, reputation and expertise of a group of men can be used to provide valid points to express why the uses of atomic bombs are not a good idea, Szilard first point in his petition is about his fellow scientist, who also signed the petition, with also a background in the field of atomic power. “We, the undersigned scientists, have been working in the field of atomic power for a number of years.” (Szilard, 1945). I believe Szilard should have elaborated a little more in his point in a way that he could use more facts supporting his background as a scientist in atomic power, doing this he could have made the argument better because the reader in this case the President of the United States nor the people might not be aware of how powerful the use of atomic bombs could be. Szilard appeal to the emotions and feelings when he stated “Atomic power will provide the nations with new means of destruction. The atomic bombs at our disposal represent only the first step in this direction and there is almost no limit to the destructive power which will become available in the course of this development” (Szilard, 1945). Doing this he was looking to appeal to the human side of the reader also letting the reader know the amount of power and destruction this new weapon can bring to the table. The scientists offered alternatives and stressed the moral responsibility in the use of the bomb due to all the death and destruction that will bring to the cities that will be used against in this case Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 and possibly the United

Show More
Related

  • Leo Szilard's 'A Petition To The President Of The United States'

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    The success of the petition lies in the ability of the author to convey his position on the use of the atomic bomb while at the same time acknowledging that situations exist where he may have to change this position. He skillfully appeals to the emotion of the reader by showing the history of the war and how the current efforts are getting dangerously close to the same tactics that the United States had previously condemned. The ability to obtain such a large support for the petition might be the authors greatest success in support of the

    Read More

  • By The Bomb's Early Light Chapter Summary

    1449 Words  | 6 Pages

    Paul Boyer, the author of By the Bomb’s Early Light, has an unusually high level of expertise on the subject of atomic bombs. He is an American biochemist, analytical chemist, and a professor of chemistry at the University of California, Los Angeles. He is at the top of his field, and is a perfect candidate to write this book. Not only will he be an expert in the science of atomic bombs, but he will know the history of this kind of technology. Paul Boyer’s main idea in this book is more of a discussion of Nuclear Policy and a look back at the nuclear age.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Petition To The President

    804 Words  | 4 Pages

    Michael Smith Professor Amy Decker English 102 19 May 2015 Critical Evaluation of “Petition to the President” Szilard makes a valid argument in his “Petition to the President” essay by using a good balance of logos, pathos, and ethos as well as by being sure to restate his point to assure that the reader makes the necessary connections. He used ethos very well when stating his reason for what makes him a reliable source to be talking on behalf of the topic. Logos were used well when Szilard was explaining how the use of atomic bombs would simply open a door to more destruction and turn them into an “easy fix” for any future problems with other countries that the U.S. may face. Although he did use logos and ethos as well as pathos, it appeared

    Read More

  • Isoroku Yamamoto's Attack On Pearl Harbor

    1056 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb: 2007. Print.). Throughout the end of the war between the US and Japan, there were many ways why people lived by example. Firstly, the US made an example of Japan by showing that the US shouldn’t be messed with. Also, it shows that foes of the US that take pity on the US will not be let away without revenge.

    Read More

  • Assassination Caused By Atomic Power Summary

    816 Words  | 4 Pages

    Devastation Caused by Atomic Power “To the Congress of the United States: Yesterday, Dec 7, 1941- a date which will live in infamy. ”(Roosevelt) These famous words were spoken by the President and Commander in Chief Franklin D. Roosevelt. The actions by Japan to attack the naval base of Pearl Harbor on United States soil during a point in which we were neutral sent America quickly to declare themselves as part of World War II. “Petition to the President” by Leo Szilard is a letter written to President Roosevelt from a group of the Scientists who help create the atomic bomb.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper

    1838 Words  | 8 Pages

    Soon the U.S was attacked by Japan. The President then decided to drop the atomic bomb to end this war and quickly. The use of the atomic bomb on Japan was justified because it ended the war, was a better alternative than the others given, and helped save lives. The atomic bomb used on Japan was justified because it ended the war.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Szilard Analysis

    773 Words  | 4 Pages

    The verbiage and main points should have been sterner and utilized the fact that the scientists held specific knowledge about these weapons. A more meaningful effort might have altered the way history played out. If the Szilard and the other scientists would have gone about petitioning the bombings in complete and 100 percent opposition rather than attempting to try and dictate national policy, they might have actually been

    Read More

  • Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

    Read More

  • Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary

    1394 Words  | 6 Pages

    Overall, the work is worth reading and is recommendable for students and scholars with interest in the Truman administration, atomic warfare and weapons, the second world war, relations between the US and the Soviet, and those curious of knowing the reasons that led to Truman’s decision to use two atomic bombs on

    Read More

  • Szilard's Petition

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    A Petition to the President of the United States by Leo Szilard and Cosigners was an appeal to the President (Commander-in-Chief) from the scientists who developed the atomic bomb, to consider other options instead of using it, in a surprise attack on Japan in 1945. The scientists lead by Szilard appealed to the President to first use the option of disclosing the power of the atomic bomb and requesting Japanese surrender, or if not heeded the atomic bomb would be used. A Petition to the chairman of the United States, the author of the petition discusses why the utilization of atomic bombs is not a good idea. Szilard’s drug ab aims his expertise and knowledge to abide valid points behind his petition. He is a working scientist in the eye socket

    Read More

  • Why Was Hiroshima Justified

    1840 Words  | 8 Pages

    the bomb’s code name was “Little Boy”. Three days later, on August 9th, 1945, America dropped another bomb on Nagasaki with the code name “Fat Man”. As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by “Little Boy” alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. The dropping of the Atom bomb on Hiroshima is an extremely debatable issue with no right or wrong answer. In this essay I will describe both sides to the argument then conclude using my final opinion on whether I am for or against the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq

    311 Words  | 2 Pages

    As all the world has known, the biggest atomic bomb in warfare history by the end of World War 2 is the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima that hit on August 9th, 1945 by the direct order of our 33rd president of The United States Of America; Harry S. Truman. He thought this bomb would bring a close ending of the war (World War 2) and it definitely did but it was too much to handle afterwards when it hit. There was no choice for Truman because there was no other way to bring the war into a close. It was the last call, but they didn’t realize that after they released the bomb, it was hard to decide whether it was a mistake or the right decision. The bomb killed innocent people of 199,000 (plus more).

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb

    630 Words  | 3 Pages

    Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    863 Words  | 4 Pages

    Theoretically of course, what if a country was to develop a weapon strong enough to completely disintegrate cities and all the people living in it? Coincidently, the United states discovered a bomb that did exactly that and ended up thrusting the world into a new era of weaponized technology towards the end of World War II. Countries from this point on became wary of opposing the United States, aware of the power they possessed, especially since the US had already used this weapon on Japan to end the war.

    Read More

More about Leo Szilard Violations

Open Document