In the essay, Risk Free Life by Leonard Pitts, the author explains that a risk free life is not only impossible, but not fulfilling. People can’t have a life without risks in it or else they would be living in a bubble. Pitts illustrates both sides of this debatable idea by discussing the pros and cons of genetically selecting babies to prevent Alzheimer’s. Although the author is sympathetic to the mother’s decision, he points out that trying to achieve a risk free life and reducing risk is not only impossible but can also reduce life’s pleasures. As stated above, the author gives an example of a woman trying to negate risk in her future child’s life. The woman has an Alzheimer’s gene and wants to have a baby that will not inherit Alzheimer’s. …show more content…
People can’t have a life without surprises. There is always going to be something that comes up. The woman from the above example may get a kid free of the Alzheimer’s gene, but that same child could get cancer or die in an accident. Trying to have a risk free life is not realistic. Response The author of this article, Leonard Pitt, stated, “To live is to be surprised. And shocked.” I agree with this statement. In my life I’ve been shocked. When I was eleven my mom murdered my dad and went to prison for fifty years. Now I’m with loving and caring parents. This goes to show that there is no telling what’s going to happen next. I agree with the actions of the women in the story that had her eggs screened. It’s a good idea to have the eggs screened for a deadly disease, if the screening process can be done at the egg stage. If I were of the female gender and honestly wanted to know if my child would inherent the Alzheimer’s gene, I would have the eggs screened. I hope the woman understands the limitations of her choice and that people can’t predict the future. If a person desires a child they should know they can’t prevent every danger lurking around the corner, and their child probably wouldn’t want them to
This year, Tariji Gordon should have just had her seventh birthday. Instead, the foster family that she lived with and her siblings are mourning the fourth anniversary of her death. Tariji was born on March 6th in 2011, she was murdered, at the age of two, by her mother on February 6, 2014. The mother, Rachel Fryer, gave birth to seven other children other that Tariji. Unfortunately, Tariji was not the only victim of Fryer’s abuse and neglect, and much of this maltreatment, including her death, could have been avoided, had the case been handled and monitored properly.
In Leonard Pitts’s “Apparently Facts No Longer Mean What They Once Did" Pitt argues that facts no longer hold the weight they once did. In his article, Pitt describes an argument he had online about whether a solider in World War I fighting off an opposing company is true or not. In this argument Pitt supports his argument with facts and articles of his own while the person he was arguing with simply states that Pitts is wrong even with all the evidence provided.
Leonard Pitts Jr is the writer behind ‘What can I do?’ a powerful article about the police brutality toward African American males. The issue that is presented in this article center around the numerous cases where an unarmed African American males were killed by police officers majority of them white for undignified reasons. The authors position on this issue is police brutality on African American that led to the killings of over five males were injustice. Mr. Pitts would like to hear from the readers to find ways to prevent any more incident of racial motivated police brutality, he hopes this will help make a change.
Interest in Existing Argument is the response Cohen gives to proponents of her Harm to Children Argument, to whom which uses these new reproductive technologies. Cohen’s critique of these proponents of new reproductive technologies is, she believes that it is better to be alive than not to be, even if there is health risks to children conceived through IVF. Cohen believes that serious illness and defects are not necessarily a deterring cause (with the exception of serous cases) because, its better to be alive than to not exist at all. " …in almost all cases, better to be alive than not, and these children would not be alive but for the employment of these techniques, using them to bring these children into the world is justified." (textbook
This research paper has opened my eyes and moved me. I was not aware of the horrific and disturbing events that the unfortunate individuals went through. My hope in sharing this information with you is that will also open your eyes and enlighten you on how our world is and what so many went through so that we don’t have to. It’s so unfortunate that families were torn apart due to the sick thoughts of one
She tries to convince the reader that although the woman may think that she has no other option, there will always be something more appropriate than abortion. In summary, the author says that it is wrong to act impulsively and that women need to think about the consequences before attempting the termination of her child. She explains how the small human inside is “alive and growing” (P 23). Mathewes-Green addresses the concept of the child being “unwanted”, and how that is not true because “we are valuable simply because we are members of the human race” (P 21). The language the writer uses has a strong effect on a woman's heart, especially future and current mothers.
Many children will have to face this situation when they’re older. This story should be read in school now to help prevent these issues in the
What point of view is this piece written in? Leonard Pitts, gives his point of view as well as his opinion on the topic. He also is using the word “I” or the phrase “if I were”, therefore he is speaking in first person. What is the thesis statement for this piece of writing? 1.
Every single resolution causes different outcomes, and this book shows that sometimes ordinary decisions can lead to an extraordinary life. Every decision can lead to many possible outcomes. Common decisions can appear in many ways, such as eating or going out for a walk. Although making a determination is quite simple, the result could always be surprising.
For centuries women were always supposed to just bear their husband’s child, and be nothing more than a mother and wife. This created lots of problems, such as the millions of childbirth related deaths and home abortions. This eventually sparked an initiative in Margaret Sanger. As a result of the death of Margaret Sanger’s mother due to multiple childbirths, Sanger was motivated to finding a prevention of pregnancy that could potentially save lives (Gibbs, Van Pyke and Adams 41). This task, however was not easily achieved.
The argument over a woman’s right to choose over the life of an unborn baby has been a prevalent issue in America for many years. As a birth control activist, Margaret Sanger is recognized for her devotion to the pro-choice side of the debate as she has worked to provide sex education and legalize birth control. As part of her pro-choice movement, Sanger delivered a speech at the Sixth International Neo-Malthusian and Birth Control Conference in March of 1925. This speech is called “The Children’s Era,” in which she explains how she wants the twentieth century to become the “century of the child.” Margaret Sanger uses pathos throughout her speech as she brings up many of the negative possibilities that unplanned parenthood can bring for both children and parents.
After helping out an old friend family, Ken Butler was brutally murdered. In his book Mark Smith asked his audience the question, will we have a different personality and outlook on life if we were forced to live in dangersome
Her genes made her more predisposed to the development of this psychological condition,
Is Suicide Selfish? In Harry Browne’s article “The Unselfishness Trap,” he talks about putting other’s joy over your own and whether that is considered egotistical or not. This led me to consider the question: would suicide be considered selfish? I believe that suicide would be selfish because there is so much pain that it would bring to the family, friends, and community.
Social Darwinism is the result of applying Charles Darwin’s theories of evolution to human society, and one of the forefront Social Darwinists was none other than William Graham Sumner. In general, the concept of Social Darwinism has many pros such as “breeding” out weakness and disease, supporting the strong, and encouraging the development of a more advanced society. It also as many disadvantages, however, such as a smaller gene pool, hindering the weak, and controlling who gets to have children. Using the writings of both Darwin and Sumner, these pros and cons will be explored to prove that the negatives of Social Darwinism outweigh the positives. To begin, the first pro of Social Darwinism is the elimination of weakness and disease.