Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King both spend time in prison for not abiding by the law and practicing civil disobedience, although they are for very different causes. Henry David Thoreau wrote “Resistance to Civil Government” in 1849, he went to jail for not paying a tax that supported the Mexican-American War to expand American territories. He refused to pay this tax because he did not agree to expand American territories because the expansion would lead to more slavery, which he opposed. While Martin Luther King was arrested in 1863 for protesting the treatment of African Americans in Birmingham, Alabama. In jail, Dr. King experienced harsh conditions and more segregation than he did in Birmingham as a free man, so he wrote Letter From Birmingham Jail.” Dr. King and Thoreau had similar tactics …show more content…
Both Thoreau and King used the same strategies ethos (ethical), logos (logical), and pathos (emotional), but they used it in a very different way. King used pathos referring to him being arrested for not having a proper permit to protest, even though that’s guaranteed in his 1st amendment right, and he talked about his injustices in jail. While in contrast Thoreau explained that the government doesn’t do anything to keep the country free, such as in 1849 education wasn’t a guaranteed right, and slavery in the south was very popular, he does this by saying “It does not” a lot, referring to the government. For logos, Thoreau explained why he didn’t pay the tax because he believed the government gets nothing done on their own, and that the majority of Americans opposed the war, so why
In 1849, Henry David Thoreau’s essay, Resistance to Civil Government was published. In this essay, Thoreau discussed the importance of using civil disobedience in hopes of creating a more civilized government. Around 100 years later, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a letter to some clergymen about why blacks should have the same civil rights just like everyone else called, Letter from Birmingham Jail. King was greatly influenced by Thoreau and many of King’s ideas were acquired from principles used in Thoreau’s essay. Compare and contrast how these two men were similar and different when it came to their beliefs of civil disobedience.
The time is now to “Let Freedom Ring!” Dr King, whom is an avid extremist, is an enormous advocate for civil rights. In his speech “I Have A Dream” and his news excerpt “Letter From Birmingham Jail.” With every political and religious piece of literature he’s published, there is always persuasion. The two i’m going to focus on are logos and pathos.
While Thoreau certainly uses pathos to influence the reader, his use of it was far less personal and, moreover, less effective than King’s “Letter to a Birmingham Jail”. In paragraph seven, King explains the reason why people who say "wait" do not understand why such a request is unobtainable and impractical. He uses hypothetical and true, personal, anecdotes to strengthen and support his clause. His examples strive to successfully penetrate through the dubiety of his most skeptical readers. In comparison to Thoreau, King also uses loaded words in a more frequent manner throughout his text.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is considered as one of the most influential Civil Rights activists during the twentieth century in a period of prejudices and racism were still prevalent. King fought against discrimination of all people, but often found himself campaigning against the unfair treatment of African Americans during the mid-twentieth century. In 1963, King found himself in an Alabama jail in the city of Birmingham. He was arrested for being a part of a nonviolent demonstration without a permit. King had been protesting because of continuous unfair treatment of African Americans in Birmingham, Alabama.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr was a Civil Rights supporter and a large reason that African-Americans are seen as people today. He did some incredible things in his life, unfortunately, he never really got to see his dream unfold. For as when he was assassinated on April 4th, 1968; however, he did some great things one involved a letter and he used a few devices to get his points to flow into the reader. In Dr. Martin Luther King Junior's persuasive plea, "Letters to a Birmingham Jail" he uses Ethos and Pathos to encourage his audience to do what is morally right which in this instance would be to desegregate. Luther uses facts throughout his letter to further develop how people see him as a credible person with high intellect.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau both use the same kinds of rhetorical strategies in their writing to achieve similar purposes, although they target completely opposite audiences. In both Thoreau’s “Resistance to Civil Government” and King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, logical appeals are scattered throughout to strengthen their arguments. Thoreau says in his essay, “It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience.” Thoreau deduces that if corporations are made up of men, and men have consciences, then corporations are therefore conscientious.
, Thoreau stated,“I can not stand for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is the slaves government also. ”(Civil Disobedience, Thoreau) Martin Luther King Jr writes in ‘A Letter from Birmingham Jail’ that “ Its unjust treatment of Negros in the courts is a notorious reality.” (Letter from Birmingham Jail, Joliffe and Hephzibah) These quotes show that Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr both share the ideals that the government is against any person that is not white. Thoreau will not be accepting the rule of the government because he can not trust an organization that discriminates against other human beings because they are of a different race.
Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. never met, but they did have common ideas about civil disobedience. Thoreau went to jail when he refused to pay a poll tax and King went to jail when he marched in Birmingham to protest the injustice there towards African Americans. While they were in jail, they wrote letters on why they chose to be disobedient. In their letters, they wrote for different audiences. Thoreau's letter went to the general public and was about how they should rise up when they feel strongly about an injustice.
In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s essay, “Letter From a Birmingham Jail” and Henry David Thoreau essay “Civil Disobedience,” both share their opinions on social injustice and civil disobedience. They both believe that people can protest unfair and unjust laws imposed on them in a civil way. In addition, King and Thoreau are challenging the government with their essays, which they wrote after they got sent to jail. For protesting the treatment of blacks in Birmingham, Alabama, King spent eleven days in jail; Thoreau spent a night in jail for refusing to pay his poll tax. Both King and Thoreau’s essays present similar plans for a resolution.
Bijan Safizadeh English III Mr Godburn 6-19-15 MLK’s Civil Disobedience Martin Luther King Jr and Henry David Thoreau both lived in a period of time were they believed their was a social injustice and set out to disobey the law. Thoreau obviously coming first, set out and made a policy known as “civil disobedience” and was soon the model for King’s crusade.. Thoreau observed the standards and responsibility of the american citizens to take it into their own hands to protest against the unjust and unconstitutional laws that the government enforces.wise, King preaches to the 8 holy men and the rest of his “audience” that its government was making intolerable and unjust laws and social standards against black people. King believed civil disobedience would be the blacks best attempt at freedom. First off, Both Thoreau and King had a very similar style of persuasive writing.
“I do not wish to quarrel with any man or nation, I do not wish to split hairs, to make fine distinctions, or set myself up as better than my neighbors” (“Civil Disobedience”). Henry David Thoreau was a man who was marvelous at contradicting himself. He says he does not want to make himself seem superior to others, but all the man does is patronize others who do not think or act as he does. The man preaches individuality, but one cannot truly be an individual; all the ideals that someone come up with and follow, it is almost promised someone else has already thought of it. The simple act of trying to have someone follow the way another think and live, which is what Thoreau spent most of his life doing, is in fact stripping them from their own
In my opinion Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. have very similar purposes in their writings. Both author 's are writing to protest unfair laws. But they also have very different audiences. In Civil Disobediance, Thoreau writes how those who break unjust laws should suffer the consequences as a protest to the laws.
Henry David Thoreau was a philosopher and writer who wrote “Civil Disobedience.” Thoreau talks about growing up during the time of slavery and wanting the government to stop. Thoreau claims: “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau expresses agreement with the idea “that government is best which governs least.” Thoreau was a man who wanted the people to stand up for their freedom and help stop the government from taking over by all the wrong things they were doing to America. Jacob, Hughes, and Thoreau loved America and knew it was the land of freedom and change, so they fought and never gave up.
Martin Luther King Jr. effectively implements ethos,pathos, and logos in his “Letter to from a Birmingham Jail”. In terms of pathos, Martin Luther King Jr. feels disappointed and he wants to call people to action to help solve these injustices in a nonviolent way. He is outspoken about his nonviolence when he explains his four step process: “collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action”. For ethos Martin Luther King Jr. is a credible source because he was a leader of the African-American Civil Rights Movement. He also addresses his own credibility in the letter “I have the honor of serving as president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, an organization operating
Thoreau had completely different views and perspectives than Gandhi. Thoreau believed in breaking the law if it is unjust or abusive. In the essay Civil Disobedience it says “I was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion. Let us see who is the strongest”.