ipl-logo

Letter From Killers Of The Flower Moon By David Grann

712 Words3 Pages

Letter To Governor Of Oklahoma Dear Mr. Governor, I’m writing this letter in order to ask that you repay the Osage for all the hardships that they were put through during and after the reign of terror. After reading Killers Of The Flower Moon by David Grann, it has come to my attention just how much the Osage have suffered. I’m not just talking about the reign of terror, I'm also talking about the unfair laws and acts, corrupt justice system, and so called guardians of their money. All I ask is that they receive a fair amount of compensation or even a way for the Osage tribe to make money off of the windmills that are invading the Osage land. Before you make up your mind, allow me to elaborate on all the wrong doings and mistreatment that has transpired against the Osage. …show more content…

We like to think of our land as our land, but is it really ours? We all know of Squanto and how he helped the pilgrims survive, yet we fail to show our appreciation. After helping these new people to their land, the Indians including the Osage are driven from their land to deserted reservations meant specifically for them in the Indian removal act. To make matters worse, the land rush of 1889 had the Osage moved to even smaller areas. Now the Osage were relying on the government to support them as they knew not how to plant crops and could not scavenge as they used to. Most of the shipments meant for the Osage went missing along the way or never got sent in the first place. The Osage did as they were told and yet the government did almost nothing to keep them alive. David Grann’s Killers of The Flower Moon went into great detail about the missing shipments and how the government didn’t step in to help until an Osage leader almost had to threaten battle. To make matters worse, when the Osage finally were able to make a living off of the oil, they continued to experience laws and rules against

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Hunger For Indian Land In Andrew Jackson's America

    1434 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the article by Anthony F. C. Wallace, “The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America,” the reasons for America's need for Indian land is discussed. The purpose of this article is to explain the Indian removal that occurred under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The thesis of this essay states that Americans kicked the Natives off of their land to fulfill a selfish desire to expand the cotton industry.           The first point Wallace uses to support his thesis is how Jackson’s financial interest in the land affected the removal of Natives.

    Read More

  • Louis Riel Sparknotes

    820 Words  | 4 Pages

    “This is our land! It isn’t a piece of pemmican to be cut off and given in little pieces to us. It is ours and we will take what we want.” (voices and visions chapter 8 pg.181, poundmaker in the english tongue) The Cree and many Métis believed that the land was theirs and they were entitled to it.

    Read More

  • How Did The Indian Removal Act Dbq

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    why would America claim it's theirs if they’ve probably never even seen the land. According to an article written by PBS I titled “Indian Removal” it states, “In 1823 the Supreme Court handed down a decision which stated that Indians could occupy lands within the United States, but could not hold title to those lands. This was because their “right of occupancy” It's ridiculous that America wants to move something or more importantly someone that has been there for hundreds of years. If you don't understand what I mean, Think about it this way, would you want to be moved from your house after living there for live thirty years.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The French And Indian War Dbq

    413 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act Of 1790

    1501 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

    Read More

  • Summary Of Andrew Jackson's Speech Concerning The Indian Removal Act

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the U.S started to rapidly expand westward, there were major conflicts between white settlers and the Native Americans who occupied those regions. The need to push Native Americans out of their ancestral lands led to President Andrew Jackson’s speech concerning the Indian Removal Act on December 6, 1830. The Indian Removal Act was put in place by the United States government to move the Native Americans west of the Mississippi River into what was described to be “Indian Territory” (Bentley, 2011, p. 679). In his speech, President Andrew Jackson stated that the Indian Removal Act would “ Place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters.” It was very evident that the Native Americans were in fact portrayed as savages and unequal to the American people.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

    552 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Document 3, Cherokee Nation, a cherokee tribal member gave a speech that one part states, “This is the land of our Nativity; the land of our birth. We cannot consent to abandon it for another far inferior [place]”. Meaning they will not give up there land that they were born on, for somewhere else. Theodore Frelinghuysen’s speech, (Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen) mentions that a long, long time ago, God placed the tribes where he wanted them, which means they were here way before us, and we should not force them to move. Both documents infer that their land is important and sacred to them.

    Read More

  • How Was The Indian Removal Act Justified

    885 Words  | 4 Pages

    Finally,It was the responsibility of the Government. According to Andrew Jackson, “It is, therefore, a duty which this government owes to the new States to extinguish as soon as possible the Indian title to all lands which Congress themselves have included within their limits. ”(State of The Union Address,1829) When the US bought over Georgia and Florida they had to get rid of any indigenous people or intruders. All in all,this act really was necessary for the development of our

    Read More

  • How Does Andrew Jackson Use Land As A Symbol Of Human Existence?

    918 Words  | 4 Pages

    During westward expansion, land has played a key role in the existence of humans. It has been the individual thirst for power and expansion that causes humans to feel the need to gain land. Even in medieval times, one could not be considered nobel unless one had acquired land. In addition to seeing land as a powerful entity and a symbol of strength, it is also seen as necessary for the preservation of human existence. Infact, Andrew jackson in his address to congress on the Indian Removal Act, John.

    Read More

  • What Are Andrew Jackson's Ideals

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indians were forced to move west, Andrew Jackson offered the Indians the same amount of land, but that wasn’t the point. The Indians couldn’t care less on the land in the west. That land they were on was their sacred land. Overall the Native Americans were given the same amount of land that didn’t allow Jackson or the government to take

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

    251 Words  | 2 Pages

    The land was seen as a way to a greater nation because people believed God gave them the right. However, while they believed this and tried to make it happened, they had a conflict. Native American stood in their way and the only way to get what the people wanted the Natives needed to leave. This brings on the Indian Removal Act that occurred in 1830 leaded by Andrew Jackson. This can be seen in the article written by Jackson on the Removal Act on the lines, “It will place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of occupied by a few savage hunters.”

    Read More

  • Trail Of Tears Essay Thesis

    1849 Words  | 8 Pages

    From all the population’s forced relocations that happened in our history, the trail of Tears is probably one of the most famous of them, and often refers as a really dark chapter in the US history. Its appellation, “Trail of Tears”, says a lot about the conditions that the Indian populations had to go through during this organized removal. The consideration that the government authorities, led by President Andrew Jackson, had about the Cherokee, Seminole, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Creek tribes, was inexistent at that time. These forced removals bring us to the point of questioning ourselves: how could a US president encourage the removal of thousands of Indians, based on the fact that their land brimmed with gold? How was this even tolerated by the public opinion, and sometimes ignored by powerful institutions, like the Supreme Court?

    Read More

  • Native American Rights In The 1800s

    1119 Words  | 5 Pages

    This is made clear in the “Cherokee County Map” by James Mooney, which shows the outlines of Cherokee territory throughout the years. From the start of the American Revolution to the Final Cession Cherokee Indians have lost more than half of their original land. Mooney’s map shows that Native Americans lack economic rights because they did not have the right to their land. Throughout the 1800s, Natives have had their land taken by unfair treaties and by Indian Removal acts. This document was created shortly after the U.S. government took the last of Cherokee land.

    Read More

  • David Grann's Killers Of The Flower Moon

    1149 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Ward system which mandated guardianships among the Osage, was a direct attempt to curtail their monetary success, as if they had no ability to manage their own wealth. It is only when Mollie Burkhart is forty-four years old that she is declared “competent” to manage her own affairs, “‘…the said Mollie Burkhart…is hereby restored to competency and the order heretofore made adjudging her to be a incompetent person is hereby vacated’”(Grann 229). All this ward system accomplished was to communicate to others that Osage were not considered “true” Americans and therefore could not mange their own wealth. This attempt to limit the disbursement of their profits is an attempt to infantilise the Osage, which is essentially a form of slavery. With all forms of racial infantilism, there comes a racial depiction of the “simple” form of the race and that these people must be “protected” from their naïveté.

    Read More

  • Native Americans In The 19th Century

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

    Read More

More about Letter From Killers Of The Flower Moon By David Grann

Open Document