To what extent does your comparative study of Pride and Prejudice and Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen demonstrate that the conflict between an individual and society is an important universal concern?
Through their respective works and texts, composers often illustrate conflict within the perspectives of both characters and responders. A close comparison of ‘Pride and Prejudice’ and ‘Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen’, enables individuals to identify the disclosure of conflict as an important universal concern. Analysing the characterisation of Elizabeth and the didactic tone used by Weldon, conflict between an individual and society is revealed through the restrictions of marriage, rigidity of gender roles and shifting
…show more content…
Disregarding one’s affection in conflict of needing security within marriage is further presented in “A single man of large fortune, four or five thousand a year. What a fine thing for our girls!” as the exclamation and delighted tone portrayed exemplifies utilitarian purposes in seeking marriage. Weldon reinforces the practical value governing marriages in Austen’s context in the quote “women lived well by their husbands favour”, expressed through a condescending tone. This creates emphasis on the large dependency women held to their male counterparts, further highlighting the difficulty women faced within their marriages. However, in delving into the notion of marriage in ‘Letters to Alice’, an apparent progression in changing perspectives and ideals is exhibited, when Weldon comments “I took the broad and primrose Road to Hell, by going out with our father when he left and she stayed on the narrow, uphill path of righteousness…” expressively displaying an evident social progression. As Weldon touches upon the concept of …show more content…
Women in the Regency period were often seen as inferior and malleable, objectified for purposes of marriage, continuing lineage and upholding a reputable name within society. The absence of independence they held is highlighted in the quote “ A single man of large fortune: four or five thousand a year. What a fine thing for our girls!”, emphasised through the delighted tone and exclamation used. This portrays conflict between women and their society through the deficiency of self-choice and confinement in domesticity. On the other hand, men were seen as breadwinners of the households. They were portrayed by society as desired objects in elevating status and financial security for women. The quote “Mr Darcy soon drew the attention of the room by his fine tall person, handsome features, noble mien; and the report which was in general circulation within five minutes after his entrance” exemplifies Mr Darcy as a metaphor of society, symbolic of its values and norms, similarly highlighting conflict between individuals and society regarding personal desires and choices. Weldon’s discernment regarding Regency era’s rigid gender roles is expressed in the quote “Women were born poor, and stayed poor, and lived well only by their husbands’ favour”. Repetition of the word ‘poor’ highlights the conflict for single women against their society, as
In her article, “Three Inventories, Three Households”, Laurel Thatcher Ulrich argues that women’s work was crucial not simply for subsistence but that “women were essentials in the seventeenth century for the very same reasons they are essentials today-for the perpetuation of the race” (Ulrich 51). She believes, women were expected to do everything. They were not only to take care of the children, but they were also cook, clean, raise the greens and ranches. Mainly, women plays important role for the survival and continuation of life.
Throughout history the existence of patriarchy has threatened women’s rights to equality and self-determination. Patriarchy manifested itself in the marriage practices of early modern European society and became the foundation on which couples built their love and partnership. During the sixteenth century, literature describing ideal wives and husbands was a popular genre, but works about female gender roles were more prevalent. The Bride, a poem published by Samuel Rowland’s in 1617 details the duties of a good wife and life partner.1 The duties listed in Rowland’s poem were very common for women at that time and can also be seen in Steven Ozment’s book, Magdalena and Balthasar. Ozment’s book documents the relationship of Nuremberg Merchant Balthasar Paumgartner and
The act of marriage is perceived differently depending on the individual, however, it is clear that a generalization can be put into place looking back both historically and on our values today. In our modern world, the act of getting married can be described as mutual affection, equality on both ends to support one another other, and wanting to be with someone based on care for them, and not out of one’s own benefit. These values in our 21st century are drastically different than what was common in the 17th century. It is important to look back onto how marriage used to be historical. This can be indicated by analyzing the interactions between the characters in Pride and Prejudice, written by Jane Austen.
“Man for the field and woman for the hearth: Man for the sword and for the needle she: Man with the head and woman with the heart: Man to command and woman to obey; All else confusion.” The Princess, Alfred Tennyson (1847) Women in the patriarchal society of Victorian Britain were expected to be domesticated family orientated beings. Their priority in life was to marry and bear children. As Susan Kent states “Barred by law and custom from entering trades and professions by which they could support themselves, and restricted in the possession of property, woman had only one means of livelihood, that of marriage” (Kent 86).
The women in Sense and Sensibility were more interested in obtaining a husband due to financial difficulties than that of a good education. Gender stereotypes are seen throughout this novel, as educational success was only deemed important for the more superior men. Social orders reflect the differences in social class and gender. We see Austen use the economic position of women to show the powerlessness they had which underlies the pressure of marriage and the vulnerability
For instance, Lady Bracknell’s hypocritical nature is exposed when the topic of marriage is brought up. “Lady Bracknell: But I do not approve of mercenary marriages. When I married Lord Bracknell, I had no fortune of any kind. But I never dreamed for a moment of allowing that to stand in my way (Wilde 78).”
The life of a victorian servant was extremely hard. But, a lot of them considered themselves to be lucky because they had food to eat and a roof over their heads regardless of how much they got paid. They were all very desperate and in need of money but this went a pretty long way in sustaining them. Additionally, many began service at very young ages and were conditioned to accept this as the natural order of things. Servants were put into the lowest positions in large houses at very young ages, even kids as low as 8-10 years old.
In the Victorian era gender roles were defined by something called ‘separate spheres.’ This is the idea that the two sexes are defined by their natural characteristics. Women dominated the domestic sphere as they are seen morally superior than men who dominate the public sphere. This divide is seen in their marital customs as well. Women are expected to marry early and typically a man five years old.
In Jane Austen’s novel, Sense and Sensibility she discusses feminism through the challenges women may face in marriage. Austen’s portrayal of her characters Elinor and Marianne demonstrate the struggles and pressures women face. These challenges can be seen through primogeniture, Elinor and Marianne’s approach to love and marriage, and a man’s ability to ruin or help women. The familial succession of assets typically went to the first-born son or the next male heir. In the case of John Dashwood, he inherited Norland estate after the death of his father leaving his half-sisters and stepmother “to quit the neighborhood Norland” and move to a small cottage in Devonshire.
In the Victorian era, men and women based their connections on the formidable society that was there at that time. Qualities that were not wanted by the society were ignored and disregarded as inappropriate, thus making conduct in this era very stern and gender stereotypical. Women at that period had a distinctly strict way of life. The main role of a woman was considered to marry, to take part in their husbands’ life, and to take on their husbands’ interests and business. They were confined to live false lives and have false interests to please the Victorian way of lifestyle.
As the other great Victorian essayist, John Stuart Mill tries to address a fundamental problem of the new Victorian era in his work; specifically, he challenges the traditional idea of women naturally subordinated to men. Mill’s focus is mainly on the middle class women, raised to be ladies, who are not self-sufficient individuals and have to rely on their husbands. They are the ones who need to realize their conditions of subordination, alongside the men who are preprinting it, and demand equality to men. In the first paragraph, Mill states that not only “the legal subordination of one sex to the other” is wrong, but it is also one of the major obstacles “to human improvement” (Mill 1105).
The quote “Mr Darcy soon drew the attention of the room by his fine tall person, handsome features, noble mien; and the report which was in general circulation within five minutes after his entrance” further supports this notion through cumulative listing, Mr Darcy exemplified as a reflection of society, symbolic of societal values and mores. In Letters to Alice, the quote “Young men abroad today are fascinated by what we call ‘strong’ women…who work, think, earn, have independent habits and who would more make a man a cup of coffee” utilises cumulative listing and high modality to express improvement regarding social mobility for women as they were less
The standard eighteen-century view on sexual differences was a valuable form needed by England’s patriarchal society so as to emphasize the dangers to which women would be subjected if they advocated against the sacred institution of marriage and decided to enter, what James Boswell has termed “promiscuous concubinage”. Their refusal to comply with the established norms can only convert them in sexual transgressive women and therefore sexual objects. This is why Adeline and Glenmurray's relationship becomes the focal point for Opie's satire on society's attitudes towards female self-assertion, erotic desire, marriage, and women’s struggles to justify individual choice. In her essay “Adeline Mowbray, or The Bitter acceptance of women’s fate” Aida Diaz notes how “it cannot be denied that Opie offers us […] a dark image of the powerlessness and vulnerability of married women”(2010: 192). If at first Adeline refuses to marry out of philosophical principles, which she openly professes, her later acceptance of that precise status of wife can be understood as a marriage of convenience which she accepts so as to elude the stigma of prostitution to which she has fallen.
If you were go back in time to England in the early 1800s, you would find that the people lived by dramatically different rules than our modern standards. While people’s priorities were debatably similar, it seemed that all of the humane and emotional aspects of life were valued much less than the monetary problems and status issues. A good example of these weighted values can be found in Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice”. The novel tells a story of love and drama that follows the romantic and emotional development of a family with 5 young girls. When some young and wealthy “bachelors” arrive in the neighborhood, a journey of confusion, corruption, but most of all, love, ensues.
In Victorian Era there was a massive discrepancy between the places that a woman and a man occupied in society. Men had the power over everything. They monopolized the business sphere, while women were presumed to stay in the domestic sphere, to take care of the children and to wait the husband home with a hot meal. Women were owned all their lives: first by their fathers and then by their husbands. The man was thought to be superior to a woman.