16 November 2016 Dear Mr. Rifkin, Jeremy Rifkin writes an incredible article which is warm hearting and does not go over the top. He states that animals are more like humans and don't get the credit they deserve. He also backs up his evidence not with personal opinion but with facts. He talks about pigs who crave affection, intelligent animals, and devastating tragedies that animals feel when losing one of their own. Rifkin states that pigs need affection like us. Mcdonald's showed a studies about pigs and how emotionally stressed they can be without social contact. This lead the European Union to outlaw such isolation in pig stalls in 2012. For example if 10 pregnant pigs are put in a stall together they can get mean with each other …show more content…
The gorilla is capable of learning how to sign just like us humans. Another intelligent animal are Dolphins. Dolphins have been observed to trick their trainers and have their own complete translatable language even if we can't understand what they are saying. Not only that but animals can be quite emotional as well. The grief of a loss offspring from an elephant's shows us that animals do feel pain when something tragic happens. Scientists has had their theory in that animals don't express grief like humans but studies show that elephants have been seen standing next to their dead offspring for days touching them. Donna Fernandes, president of the Buffalo Zoo, tells the story of being at Boston's Franklin Park Zoo ten years ago during the death of Babs, who had died of cancer. She describes seeing the gorilla's longtime mate say good-bye in a way that he was howling and banging his chest. He picked up a piece of celery which was her favorite piece of food and put it in her hand and tried to get her to wake up. Rifkin's article is very effective because of how emotional it can be to the audience. He shows examples of many animals that will make the reader think twice about how closely they can relate to them. Eliana
In A Change of Heart About Animals, author Jeremy Rifkin gives his penny for thought on the animal rights front. Rifkin states his beliefs firmly, citing evidence that supports his argument that like humans, animals are able to have emotional connections and are more like humans than we realize. However, Rifkin’s evidence swiftly begins to contradict his point. He expects humans to treat animals with equal rights without realizing animals wouldn’t be able to do the same. So, in Rifkin’s cute little imaginary world, would animals end up being superior to humans?
In the article titled "A Change of Heart About Animals," (2003), author Jeremy Rifkin addresses that contrary to previous research and discovery, new breakthroughs in science are finding that animals are more comparable to humans than we once thought, and as a result, human empathy should be extended towards them. Rifkin supports his claim by providing numerous examples of studies that show capabilities of animals to make tools (crows), develop complex language skills (Gorilla), and present signs of self-awareness (Orangutan); things once believed only to be human characteristics (Rifkin 7, 8, 10). The author's purpose is to inform and convince the readers that empathy should be inclusive to all animals by providing a multitude of studies,
According to Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart About Animals,” research has shown that animals are more similar to humans than originally believed. Through the many studies provided, Rifkin claims the need to provide better treatment towards animals. While animals deserve and could benefit from a more humane treatment than what is currently provided, they may not necessarily require a human-like lifestyle simply because of their similarities to humans.
Jeremy Rifkin, the president of the Foundation on Economic Trends in Washington D.C and author of “A Change of Heart About Animals” (2003), argues in this article that animals are much more like humans than we thought and that we should expand our empathy to our fellow creatures. Rifkin develops his thesis by comparing the similarities between humans and animals. An example of this is in paragraph 11 when he claims that animals show a sense of their own mortality and the mortality of their kin just like humans do. He supports this claim by giving an example of elephants standing next to their dead children for days after they have passed. The author gives that example of the elephants in order to make the reader understands just how aware these
As a whole, Rifkin argues the importance of treating animals with respect based on the fact that animals share characteristics with humans. I agree that animals do deserve to be treated with respect and honor, but should animals really be treated like human beings? One must look at the imperfect world we live in, it is man against man, the survival of the fittest. This evolutionary concept even takes place in the animal kingdom, one must hunt and kill for survival. Thus, will giving a pig a toy or assuring that animals are happy, change the fact that they be slaughtered and become man’s source of nutrition?
What do sign language and animals have in common? Koko the gorilla! Koko the gorilla is a Western lowland gorilla that was taught ASL, or American Sign Language. Koko is very special.
One topic that many scholars are debating right now is the topic of animal rights. The questions are, on what basis are rights given, and do animals possess rights? Two prominent scholars, Tom Regan and Tibor Machan, each give compelling arguments about animal rights, Regan for them and Machan against them. Machan makes the sharp statement, “Animals have no rights need no liberation” (Machan, p. 480). This statement was made in direct opposition to Regan who says, “Reason compels us to recognize the equal inherent value of these animals and, with this, their equal right to be treated with respect” (Regan, p. 477).
Bill Maher, the social commentator wrote in the New York Times recently, an article about animal cruelty and specifically about pigs, where he talked about mother pigs being kept in crates, called gestation crates, their entire lives. They can’t even turn around. He asks would we cram a dog into a crate for that long and the answer is, of course we wouldn’t. Pigs are, at least as intelligent as dogs, as has been proven in various tests, so it is a colossal act of indecency to confine them in such a barbarous manner. He quotes the primatologist, Jane Goodall who wrote that ‘farm animals feel pleasure and sadness, excitement and resentment, depression, fear and pain.
In human history, a number of oppressed groups have campaigned for equality, demanding for an expansion on the moral view of life, and to be treated fairly in the eye of consideration. This means that when the matter concerns this group, their voices are heard, and treated with value, and consideration. Where this equality is not determined by an assembly of facts like that group’s collective intelligence level, the colour of their skin, or the physical strength of their bodies. This is what Peter Singer brings up in his essay: “All Animals are Equal”, that non-human animals should have equal consideration with humans when matters concern them. Going into a specific set of non-human animals known as primates, I argue that primates should have some of the fundamental rights and equal consideration that are given to humans.
In the op-ed piece “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin emphasizes the similarities between humans and animals by providing results on scientific research studies to illustrate that humans should be more empathetic towards animals. In addition, he further explains how research results have changed the ways humans perceived animals and indicates solutions that were taken by other countries and organizations to help improve and protect animal rights. Rifkin provides examples that demonstrate animals have emotions, conceptual abilities, self awareness, and a sense of individualism just like humans. For example, Pigs crave for affection and get depressed easily when isolated, two birds Betty and Abel have tool making skills, Koko
Olson argues that those animals are just like us, because they do things (e.g. Sitting in our chairs, or talking, or going on holidays) like we do them. Therefore, Olson reasons that it is hard to deny that we are those
Examples of Power Corruption in Animal Farm Power corrupt is shown in the book Animal Farm by George Orwell in the ways that the pigs govern the farm; by putting themselves in a higher social class than the other animals, shaping the rules in their favor, and using fear as means of control. A famous quote by famous British historian Lord Acton states "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely", meaning someone's morals decrease as they gain more power. This is shown as the pigs' treatment and control of the animals grew more corrupt and gruesome as the story progressed. The pigs practically placed themselves on a pedestal above the other animals on the farm; they insist they deserve more than the others simply because
This is why I think factory farming should be banned for all the safety hazards and the animal abuse towards those pigs. If we replaced all those factory farms with family farms where the cattle or pigs can run around and play until they get butchered instead of sitting in pins all there life and getting trampled to death. They also have to live in there own feces, and the ventilation system isn’t the best. Where on a family farm the animals would be able to run around without getting trampled to death, or having to live in there own feces.
John Stuart Mill writes, “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.” in his book Utilitarianism. The meaning of this quote varies based on what makes an individual satisfied or dissatisfied. The “good life” is the life a person would like to live as well as what makes them better off. Would having a “good life” mean that a person is content, or does virtuosity make one happy?
Wondering why animals act a certain way is possibly a question that can never be answered correctly. Asking why animals act a certain way in an environment though, now that may be a question that can be answered! It has become a proven fact that animals act differently in every different environment and around every different animal or person. For instance, take a lion that is being taken from his home environment to a zoo. Of course, that lion is going to act up before he gets used to his environment because of different reasons like the space, or the other animals, or the food and even the training.