Liberty And Security Argument Analysis

In a speech that Learned Hand, a federal judge, gave he talked about the spirit of liberty. Hand proclaimed, “The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which seeks to understand the mind of other men and women; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which weighs their interests alongside its own without bias;” What he

We will reinforce old alliances and form new ones -- and unite the civilized world against radical Islamic terrorism, which we will eradicate completely from the face of the Earth. At the bedrock of our politics will be a total allegiance to the United States of America, and through our loyalty to our country, we will rediscover our loyalty to each other. When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice. The Bible tells us, "How good and pleasant it is when God 's people live together in unity."

“I was not designed to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion. Let us see who is the strongest.” This is a quote from Civil Disobedience, an essay written by Henry David Thoreau after being thrown jail for his refusal to pay taxes in 1846. This quote is significant because it explains Thoreau’s belief that an individual should not be forced to abide by an unjust law.

Both Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech and Kennedy’s inaugural address talk about freedom and what being free means to the citizens of the United States. However, Roosevelt’s speech talks about what freedoms people have and why we need to be free, whereas Kennedy’s speech is about why we fight for our freedom and how we need to give aid to those who are fighting to keep their own freedom. These are two different aspects of freedom. At the time Roosevelt gave his speech “Four Freedoms” World War II was happening and people were losing their freedom. One of the first points that Roosevelt makes during his speech is this, “No previous time has American security been as seriously threatened from without as it is today”(2).

For me, law is the driving force in maintaining a world of justice and order. We live in a world where the horrific consequences of worldwide terrorism are played in front of our very eyes, yet we stand and continue to watch. Living in London has made me victim to such consequences. As a Muslim, who has chosen to wear hijab, I feel more susceptible to Islamophobic attacks. It has instilled and derived a fear, a fear which prevents me from going about my day as candidly and carefree as I once did.

Bias/Prejudice Introduction The Twin Tower attack on September 11, 2001, has changed how people view their society. People are afraid of Muslims and people that wear turbans because of the horrific events that occurred in America. This tragic event also impacted the way I view people that wear turbans. Bias or Prejudice Identification As a child, I used many stereotypes jokingly not knowing that it could harm anyone.

In today’s American Democracy each branch of congress have to abide by the basic fundamental principle stated by the bill of rights. The Bill of rights were put into place to protect the U.S. citizens. In accordance with the U.S. Constitution being the highest of the law of the land. In my report I will be discussing the important of the Constitution, Executive Branch of Government, Federalism, and the Interest Groups to withhold their duties and purposes even though some have advantages, disadvantages, strengths and weakness along with positive and negative impacts. I also will be providing information on the main points that will be discussed in more depth throughout my

The Syrian refugee crisis, a product of the civil war in Syria, has dominated headlines in the news recently. Even though there is support to have these migrants resettled, there is a major pushback against refugees going into Europe and the United States. This debate will get more heated with this being one of the main issues in the presidential campaign, with the opposition growing in numbers due to the recent terrorists attack However, the opposition 's arguments against Syrian Refugees can be boiled down to fear and ignorance. If our country listens to the fear spreading around the world today, then the people who will suffer will be the Syrian Refugees. Elizabeth Warren, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts, argues, “We face a choice, a choice to lead the world by example, or to turn our backs to the threats and suffering around us” , which clearly exposes the fact that if we succumb to fear, not only we will turn our back on the refugees, but so will many other countries (Warren Video).

However, others believe that in order to prevent terrorism immigration should be strictly limited or even banned. These ideals have been increasingly embraced in the United States following the horrifying terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. A staggering number of 2,753 people passed away due to that sickening event (“9/11 by the Numbers”). Such an occurrence would understandably instill fear in the American people. This has been especially true when it comes to immigrants from Middle Eastern nations and or are of Islamic faith.

However, many times “enhanced interrogation” produced false and misleading information (McCain). Out of the prior 56-24 Americans, 59-31 of them said that the torture inflicted was justified (Blake). Terrorism brings up the desire for torture and due to the past event of 9/11, the desire for security and safety in America has gone up drastically. Those who approved of torture techniques wanted to protect Americans and “keep faith with the victims of terrorism and to prove to [their] enemies that the United States would pursue justice relentlessly” (McCain). Compared to the previous events, it’s understandable that the U.S. has such a high torture acceptance rate, however countries around the world have margins that are much less in favor for torture, so what’s the difference?

Civil Liberties Some would argue that people would rather have security instead of liberty. But if that were true, why would we risk our lives in a war to ensure our freedoms? It’s because our rights are some of the most important things in our lives that some of us would die for. However, ever since the tragic incident of 9/11, National security has slowly been chipping away at our liberties. National security has altered several of our amendments taking away our freedom of speech, freedom of unreasonable search and seizures, freedom of being held without charge, and much more.

In the United States came under attack for depriving terrorists of human and constitutional rights. These non-citizens should be protected under international human right laws, however just as in 1942, the united states uses the grounds of protecting national security as justification for their actions. Many Americans agree that terrorist should be tortured for information, as they pose a threat to national security, however this view is not held worldwide. Torture of these captives goes against international humanitarian efforts. " In its treatment of the detainees at Guantanamo, (the United States) has been unwilling to fully apply international humanitarian law ...

During times of conflict, the American government often sets limitations on civil liberties. For example, President Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War. Recently, after the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001, the government has been attempting to strengthen its control on the growing terrorism threat by increasing surveillance on the American people. Some people do not see this increase in security as a violation of their civil liberties.

Has Al Qaeda become a problem in the United States today? Does the United States need to do something to stop Al Qaeda? Many U.S. Citizens think that all types of terrorist should be killed, then we wouldn 't have to worry about them anymore. The U.S. Policy on Terrorism has spread terrorism instead of containing it. These are some of the cons on the U.S. Policy on terrorism. "

Your always being recorded! Should freedom of speech be limited ? Absolutely not! In acts 7 Stephan was stoned for expressing his religious beliefs . The first amendment of our constitution protects the people’s right to freedom of religion and expression and petitioning the government to solve grievances.