Entry #1: Lifespan Development - Personal Reflection
A - Theory and Stage
Lawrence Kohlberg’s theory of moral development holds that moral reasoning, the basis for ethical behavior, has six identifiable developmental stages. This includes three distinct levels of moral reasoning, each with two sub-stages. Stage one (1) is called Obedience and Punishment, of which this section will be based on. At this stage, children believe that authorities in their lives such as teachers and parents lay down a set of rules that they must indisputably follow. This obedience is compelled by the threat or application of punishment (Kohlberg, 1958). The stage is especially common in young children particularly at the infancy level but adults too can be guilty
…show more content…
I was always aware that my mother’s rules were there but it did not matter to me if I broke these rules once I got pleasure from what I was engaged in and in the end successfully avoiding the typical beating I normally get as punishment. I felt that once I made myself happy without getting trouble, then what I was doing wasn’t necessarily wrong. This happened because I did not understand the true meaning of morals, in fact, I did not even know the word, my thoughts were either be punished or avoid punishment at all cost. As I grew, I tried harder to find ways to avoid punishment so I tried to stick to the rules my mother laid out just so I could avoid being punished more often but I still found myself drifting at times to …show more content…
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development: Stages of Moral Development. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com.
Kohlberg, L. (1958). The Development of Modes of Thinking and Choices in Years 10 to 16. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.
McLeod, S. A. (2013). Kohlberg. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/kohlberg.html Entry #2: Social Psychology - Gender Identity
A – Overview of Concept
Social psychology is a branch of psychology that studies individuals in the social context (Kong 1996). It deals with the origins and effects of social interactions, influences, and perceptions of an individual. Gender Identity, one concept of social psychology, refers to one’s sense of oneself as male, female or transgender (American Psychological Association, 2006). In other words, gender identity is how one categorizes the gender of which they perceive themselves to belong. Those who identify with the gender that corresponds with the sex assigned at birth (male or female) are referred to as cisgender while those who identify with the gender that is different from the sex assigned at birth are transgender (Boundless, 2016). It is often manifested in the early stages of development and is either deemed acceptable or unacceptable, based on the association to a particular gender category ("Development of Gender Identity", n.d). According to Dr. Shuvo Ghosh, the concept is cohesively linked to the concept of gender role, where behaviors are dictated based
“Young children are just beginning to learn how to discriminate between right and wrong; in other words, they are developing a sense of morality” (Levine, 2016). They simply are developing the knowledge of what is right and what is wrong form themselves, but what the moral development helps them to know the difference in right and wrong and the best interest for others rather than themselves. “So, what is understood about morality as a child in middle childhood, is generally the level of reasoning most individuals will use in moral dilemmas or judging the morality of situations” (S. Tulane, personal communication, April 18, 2017). This development has an influence on everything that happens around them and the behaviors around
Easier said than done when the rules were unclear and ever changing. What was very clean and never changing were the consequences to broken rules or disobeying. The consequence to disobeying or breaking rules was my dad’s anger; the way he dealt with his anger is a whole other story. The punishments ranged from being grounded for a week to dodging a hammer as it wizzes past my head to a backhand slap to my face. I never knew what kind of day it would be
Cleere Scott Cleere Ms. Zachas English 10 Period 3 18 November 2014 Analysis Essay As children do we know what is right or wrong? Do we think for ourselves or do we act to avoid shame and punishment? Do we base our beliefs on those of our parents or our own? What would we do if we were never punished?
In the beginning period of life from birth throughout childhood, childhood to adolescence, and adolescence to adulthood enormous changes take place. Throughout the process, each person evolves into attitudes and morals that guide decisions, relationships, and understanding. This document will focus on birth through age 2. This is considered the crucial stage. This is the stage where all development begins and the specific markers will take shape.
People believe behavior is based off symbolical things such as laws, age, and social status as represented by characters such as Nurse Greta, the Juvey Cop, and a symbol such as the Bill of Life, in the book Unwind by Neal Shusterman; however, I believe it depends on the person whether their behavior can change or not. In this dystopia, symbolical behavior characteristics are exaggerated into major issues. These symbols can be a major issue today, especially the ideas of laws changing people’s behavior. Symbols do not change people; the only way someone can be changed is by either influence or self-awareness. Parents must do their best to instill good behavior and morals in their children; if parents do not do that to their kids, then the parents are at just as much as
Gender is “a social construct that prescribes the roles, attitudes,
Theoretical Background This study is anchored on Kohlberg’s Moral Development Theory. This theory proposed that moral reasoning of human beings is associated with the stages of development in solving moral issues that an individual encounters (Bjorklund & Blasi, 2010). Kohlberg’s moral development sees moral reasoning as progressing through three levels to support his claims. First, pre-conventional moral reasoning, it is characterized by apparent and physical events.
Autonomy vs shame and doubt, children from the ages of 1- 3 years are able to comprehend more about their self-image and self-control. Children can also control their body functions by completing certain assignments which gives them the feeling of freedom and self-governance. In Erikson’s third stage of his theory children can understand the difference between what is wrong and right in a social environment. However, children are very easily affected by their errors, and they are not able to see the extent of their actions. As indicated by Erikson 's 4th stage of psychosocial development, children in their middle school years start to perform more convoluted duties and see more perplexing thoughts at this stage.
In the following essay, we will explore how your sex and gender affect your identity in society. Let us take a look at the word identity. According to the dictionary of psychology on alleydog.com, a persons identity is defined as their “own sense
Although some people believe that nature affects the gender identity, others argue that, based on the education an individual receives, it is actually nurture. For example, John Moore, a teacher at a female-only school, says, “My findings suggest that, in some senses, the single-sex school is strongly feminist” (Moore, 2005). On the other hand, many societies teach the children gender stereotypes to try and limit them from becoming against what the society feels is appropriate. Gender roles or stereotypes are “a set of qualities, behaviors, and attitudes that are considered appropriate for males and females based on their biological sex” (Whalen & Maurer-Starks, 2008). Most of the time, these stereotypes are taught and explained to the children in the early stages of learning, since as mentioned above, gender identity is most likely detected after the child is two years old.
According to sexologists John Money and Anke Ehrhardt, sex and gender are separate categories. “Sex, they argued, refers to physical attributes and is anatomically and physiologically determined. Gender they saw as a psychological transformation - the internal conviction that one is either male or female (gender identity) and the behavioral expressions of that conviction” (Sterling 4). Although there are biological differences between the two sexes, but gender roles are socially constructed. They determine how males and females should think, speak, dress, behave and interact with society.
The research on Lifespan Development is ever growing. Nonetheless, it is evident that, whilst development does occur throughout the life, one’s early life experiences are what is most integral to this process. The following essay will display this through a psychodynamic lens of attachment theory. Firstly, an introduction to the lifespan approach as well as attachment theory will be delved into. Subsequently, looking at both strengths and limitations, attachment studies will be used to oppose aspects of the lifespan approach as well as display prominence on early life.
Introduction I will be explaining briefly the four major developmental theories by four different sources. Also I will be explaining that how I am going to practically apply the four major developmental theories in my teaching field. Firstly I will be explaining about the Psychosocial Developmental theories Of Erik Erikson’s. Secondly I will explain the Cognitive theories of Jean Piaget. Thirdly I will explain the Moral Developmental theories of Lawrence Kohlberg.
Unlike my father, my mother is very strict. When I was a teenager, my mother would punish me for simple mistakes. I remember her spanking my brothers and me for not cleaning the dishes well. One the other hand my father do not believe in spanking children. As a child, I loved going to my father’s house for the weekend; he would let me get away with being disobedient.
1); as well as aspects of categorizing concepts with reference to factors in social psychology. For example, the article titled, ‘Prototype Theory: An Alternative Concept Theory for Categorizing Sex and Gender?’ seek to explore the prototype theory to determine whether it captures the fluidity of gender and is able to accommodate transgender and queer identities. The article clearly defined the features of the category labelled ‘woman’ on the basis of sex and gender and applied the prototype theory to these concepts as it relates to the hierarchal levels of categorization. According to Fox (2011), utilizing the prototype theory as a theoretical framework for the concepts of sex and gender provides structural flexibility and inclusiveness (Fox, 2011).