ipl-logo

Essay On Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

825 Words4 Pages

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
History
The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 was signed into law by President Barack Obama, January 29, 2009. The purpose and goal of the Lilly Ledbetter Act is to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This Ledbetter Act states that the 180-day statue of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit regarding pay discrimination resets with each new paycheck affected by that discriminatory action. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair__Pay_Act_of_2009) The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is closely related to a May 2007 United States Supreme Court decision that limited the ability of victims of pay discrimination to sue and recover damages under the Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The …show more content…

This Act strives to protect the employee that may face discriminatory pay on all categories such as race, gender, age, color or any disability that the employee may be facing. The Act also creates larger burdens for the employers to defend against alleged discriminatory decisions or practices that may have occurred prior to the Act being signed by President Barack Obama. The decision of the Ledbetter Act doesn’t really protect a large variety of victims that are faced with pay discrimination, simply because it ignores the actual workplace reality that occurs. Many employees do not have access to other coworkers’ salaries due to that information being confidential information. This would be the only way for a person to be able to find out if they are being paid less than others that are doing the same job as they are in their organization. The only way that Lilly found out was from the anonymous note years later after the discrimination had started. As an impact of the Ledbetter Act employees who don’t find about the discrimination until more than 180 days past the movement when the decision to pay the less is made will have no remedy after all. The Act allow the employees a fair opportunity to file discrimination paycheck claims. Leviticus 19:13 reads, “You shall not oppress your neighbors or rob him. The wages of a hired servant shall not remain with you all night until the morning

Show More
Related

  • NAACP V. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue: Case Study

    759 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Title VII’s disparate-impact provision inhibits employment practices that have the unintentional effect of race discrimination (Walsh, 2016, p.114). Even though Congress enacted Title VII for the main purpose of confronting racial discrimination in the workplace, courts have continued to struggle to appropriately address the prevalence of subtle racial discrimination that burdens minority applicants/employees today (Ritenhouse, 2013). Another legal issue included in this case is North Hudson refusing to implement non-discriminatory hiring procedures that do not disproportionately exclude African-Americans from employment without evidence of business need. The employer also refused to correct the effects of previous discriminatory practices. As an end result of this case, the District Court held that the employer’s business-necessity justification was insufficient and that there were alternative means to achieve the goals stated that were less

    Read More

  • Matheson Flight Extenders Case Study

    384 Words  | 2 Pages

    Matheson Trucking, Inc. vs. Matheson Flight Extenders warehouse workers The discrimination case that I am discussing is the recent victory of five former and two current warehouse workers of Denver Colorado’s Matheson Flight Extenders, a branch of the Sacramento, California based-Matheson Trucking Company. This suit, stemming from incidents beginning in 2010, involved managers committing the atrocity of race discrimination, defamation of character, and demoralization. My thoughts are intense anger at the treatment of these workers. What training or ethics class, or intro to being a decent human being did these managers miss?

    Read More

  • California Fair Pay Act Case Study

    362 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the new law, employers will be prohibited from paying their employees of opposite sex a lower pay rate when the job duties are “substantially similar.” Previously, laws were in place protecting

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

    1572 Words  | 7 Pages

    On January 29th, 2009 President Obama signed his first bill, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Recognition to pass the bill began when Lilly Ledbetter received an anonymous letter stating the male managers and their surprisingly larger salaries. Ledbetter decided to take Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. to court, however, the judge ruled in favor of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., which then lead to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. The act states that as long as workers file their charges within 180 days (or 300 days in some jurisdictions) from the time they received any discriminatory paycheck, they are able to file a claim (Committee On Education & The Workforce Democrats). Although the act is better than the Equal Pay Act of 1963, which only allowed 180 days from the first discriminatory paycheck to file a claim, there are still problems with the act.

    Read More

  • Ricci V. Destefano Case Study

    1548 Words  | 7 Pages

    Charles Mitchell (2013) went on to say, “by not promoting the more successful White employees, was this an act of illegal disparate treatment under Title VII (p. 43)? The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was illegal disparate treatment. Assisting the U.S. Supreme Court in their ruling is the established Uniform Guidelines on Employment Selection Procedures (UGESP). The guidelines state, when an employer determines that adverse impact was evident in its testing process, they shall (1) valid the procedures (test), (2) confirm the linkage to its job, (3) consider alternative testing procedures (Mitchell, p. 45).

    Read More

  • Eeoc Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay

    432 Words  | 2 Pages

    Categories from 1966 when EEOC began collecting the data to the most recent collected information in 2013. The EEOC is an agency that continues to enforce all of our euqalities. They have done a lot over the 50 plus years that they have been effectivie and continue to do for our nation. The Act of 1964 was an ominbus bill addressing not only the discrimination in employment but also in voting, public accommondations, and education as well. Now adays all though there is still some discrimination happening it is definitly nothing like the way things were all those years ago before the

    Read More

  • How Did The New Deal Affect African Americans In The 1930's

    736 Words  | 3 Pages

    The same White women who were also facing the same discrimination from the Public Work Programs as the Blacks. This shows how drastically the wage difference was between Whites and

    Read More

  • 14th Amendment Vs Title Vii

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    On the other hand, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act attempts to remedy the “structural imbalance of the court system” by regulating private employers (Han, Week 3 Lecture, 1/23/17). Title VII uses statutory laws to regulate private employers from discriminating against characteristics like race and sex in the workplace by threatening the profits of these private entities (Han, Week 3 Lecture, 1/23/17). Unfortunately, these Title VII claims face their own barriers in court, making it difficult to use subtle discrimination to prove inequality. The limitations of these approaches are evidenced in cases like Washington v. Davis Sup. Ct. (1976), Griggs v Duke Power Co Sup.

    Read More

  • St. Mary's Honor Center V. Hicks Case Study

    2155 Words  | 9 Pages

    St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks (1993) According to the EEOC (2014), the Civil Rights Act of 1964 revision spoke directly to damages in cases of intentional discrimination in employment. Prior to this revision and since this revision, there have been and are still employment discrimination cases going before the courts. This Act forbids employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, national origin, physical disability, and age in any aspect of the employment process. Anyone who feels they have been discriminated against should file a suit against should file a claim with the Equal Opportunity Commission, who is charged with enforcing anti-discrimination cases.

    Read More

  • Title Vii Civil Rights Act Of 1964

    4343 Words  | 18 Pages

    I. BACKGROUND The history of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as Title VII) is very intriguing. It is connected with a southern filibuster against federal civil rights legislation in the United States. This southern filibuster ended by the U.S. Congress for the first time in June 1964, while, on July 2, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 into law (Arnesen 2007, p. 251). Given this, Title VII, Equal Employment Opportunity, should be considered the most significant part of the whole Civil Rights Act of 1964, because Title VII stimulated visible rise in minority and women group employment.

    Read More

  • Bernice Sandler Discrimination

    154 Words  | 1 Pages

    When the Civil Rights Act was written in 1964, its impact was widespread to say the least. Although it covered protection from discrimination based on religion and race, it did not cover the prevention of discrimination within federally funded programs. This is where Bernice Sandler steps in. Sandler, a well-qualified candidate for this position, was seeking employment as a faculty member at the University of Maryland. She was denied the position because she came across as “too strong for a woman” (Sandler). Sandler complained to the Department of Labor’s Office for Federal Fair Contracts Compliance and offered university statistics that female employment at the university had decreased because males had replaced more qualified female

    Read More

  • Lilly Ledbetter Discrimination

    594 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act 2009 is named after a woman who discovered that the men at her workplace received higher pay for doing the exactly same job she was doing. Lilly Ledbetter then took her pay discrimination complaint all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled in 2007 that claims like hers had to be filed within 180 days of an employer’s decision to pay a worker less, even if the worker didn’t learn about the unfair pay until much later, as was the case for Mrs. Ledbetter. (Slack, 2012). When Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Act 2009 he not only overturned the 2007 decision of the Supreme Court but he also made it easier for workers to challenge unequal pay. “United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (n.d)” advises “the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 overturned the Supreme Court 's decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 550 U.S. 618 (2007), which severely restricted the time period for filing complaints of employment discrimination concerning compensation.”

    Read More

  • Racial Bias In The United States Essay

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the workforce, there are wage gaps amongst different races. African americans earn seventy-three percent as much as whites and hispanics earn sixty-nine percent as much (Patten 9). Although the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the State and Federal powers to exploit an employee based upon their race, religion, and gender, there is still discrimination in how much a person earns based upon their race and gender. Even though there is an equal employment opportunity agency that protects an individual’s civil rights in a workplace, there is still racial bias in salary

    Read More

  • 19th Amendment Essay Thesis

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    Congress first addressed the issue more than four decades ago in the Equal Pay Act of 1963, mandating an "equal pay for equal work" standard, and addressed it again the following year in Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.” (congressional-digest 1) Statistics reveal that

    Read More

  • Glass Ceiling Informative Speech

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the Equal Pay Act was signed in 1963, a woman made 59 cents for every dollar made by a man. Since then, the wage gap has narrowed by a little less than half a cent each year. If it continues to decrease at this rate, women will not earn an equal pay to men until 2059. The difference in wage adds up to a loss of 1.2

    Read More

More about Essay On Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Open Document