Freedom Of Speech In Singapore Essay

895 Words4 Pages

Singapore is a first world nation that has the freedom of press of a third world nation. The right to freedom of speech is a universal human right and is vital to a democracy. This paper submits that the current laws curbing free speech are too restricting, and does not strike an appropriate balance in Singapore. It is undeniable that the right to free speech should not be absolute and may be limited when it violates another right. This paper accepts that free speech should be restricted when an individual’s personal reputation is at stake. Defamation laws protect the dignity of the individual from falsehoods. As Lord Hobhouse indicated in Reynolds v Times Newspaper; “There is no human right to disseminate information that is not true. No public interest is served by publishing or communicating misinformation. The working of a democratic society depends on the members of that society, being informed not misinformed. Misleading people and the purveying as facts statements which are not true is destructive of the democratic society…” However, Singapore has also justified the restriction of free speech for the sake of ‘public order’. This may be permitted if the use of free speech is the direct cause of public disorder. In the past, ethnic tensions, …show more content…

Free communication with others allows for the shaping of one’s ideas and reflections. Why should a free and rational individual be prohibited from expressing his/her thoughts? It is through discussion that an individual “emerges as an autonomous agent in the positive sense of being able to consciously direct his or her life and to participate in the direction of the community”. Free speech accepts every uninhibited opinion and perspective, allowing others to learn from each other. The “wrong” or less persuasive ideas will be managed by natural selection in the marketplace discussed

Open Document