Freedom of expression protects everyone to be allowed to express themselves freely. Without this guaranteed freedom, peculiar opinions would be not be heard in fear of retribution, change and progress would stop and all of the other freedoms listed in the Constitution and all of the amendments that follow would no longer exist. I believe the foundation to the other amendments would be Freedom of expression. It is what holds the constitution together and what allows the people to have a say in its government. According to IIP digital “The U.S. Constitution’s protection of freedom of expression embodies the notion that an individual’s ability to express himself freely — without fear of government punishment — produces the autonomy and liberty that promote better governance.
Freedom of speech is indeed a basic human right, but does protecting free speech includes hate speech? Having the freedom to say anything causes the possibility of offending or harming certain groups. Consequently, protecting free speech at all costs might result in the instability of the country. Therefore, I disagree with the statement made that freedom of speech should be protected at all cost. Why is freedom of speech so important?
Other lines of thought later argued in favor of freedom of the press without relying on the controversial (disputed) issue of natural law; for instance, freedom of expression began to be regarded as an essential component of the social contract. Parallel with the concept of press freedom, the term fourth estate remains for all journalistic activity today. However, the press is not part of the governmental structure; but monitors the other branches (the legislative, the executive and the judiciary) as an external check on behalf of the people. This impact of the press as a skeptical and critical monitor the other branches of government on behalf of the people is the watchdog role of the press. For this role, mass media have to value its traditional, high standards for accuracy, sourcing and objectivity.
It is absolutely necessary because it’ll help protect people against the power of the national government. In fact, if there is no limit to what the government can and can’t do, it is safe to say that they could also possibly abuse the people’s rights, taking away our freedom, liberty, etc. As a matter of fact, if we do have a Bill of Rights, it sets limits in place and provides the people’s protection from being exploited by a simple weakness. Similarly, there’s also no mention of freedom of religion, speech, or press. Since these freedoms aren’t mentioned in the Constitution, the government is allowed to exercise authority over these freedoms.
Gozon, Cherie Ann O. PhD Media Studies Media 210 While the main premise of both libertarianism and social responsibility is freedom, but the specific context as to what kind of freedom they uphold and its underlying conditions as to the press’ content, accountability, operations, and audience response are different. Libertarianism of the press encourages a high regard for freedom of the press to the point that they publish any information – be it good or bad – and trusts the audience’s mental capacity to distinguish facts and opinions from fabricated information. (Campbel, Martin & Fabos, 2012) This theory believes that the press has the responsibility to divulge all information – no censorship, whatsoever – for public consumption. It also believes that people have the mental capacity to understand and interpret media messages. Because libertarianism strongly pushes for freedom of the press, this theory makes accountability and ethics optional.
The fact that one has the right to say and believe is the foundation for democracy to function. If no one dared to say their opinions, then it had become a dictatorship where only one opinion on how society and the country should work had been the “right”. If people dared to express their opinions, they will help improving the society one lives. Freedom of speech gives one the responsibility to consider what fits into different contexts, and it will make us better persons and people. Simply, people will feel safe in the society they live in.
What is freedom of speech? What is the limit of our freedom of speech? Freedom of speech is the right to speak without censorship or limitation by the government and without having to fear that there will be any action taken against them. Restrictions must not be based on a certain tradition or religion and must not discriminate against anyone living in a particular country. Other countries have already applied freedom of speech in their culture, such as Jamaica, Chile, New Zealand and Uruguay.
Freedom of Speech and Expression The Preamble of Indian Constitution starts with “ We the people..” and secures its citizens Justice, Equality, Liberty, Fraternity and so on. Constitution aims to provide justice to all. Constitution establishes Freedom and also guarantees different rights incorporated in itself that are self protected. The concept “ Freedom of speech and expression” has been borrowed from American constitution , but its emergence can be easily depicted from Jurisprudence as defined by several jurists in there different theories mainly Ancient theories, medieval theories, Renaissance theories, and Modern theories. These theories are a part of Natural Law, and freedom of speech and expression also serves as basic law to every citizen of society.
1.5 Regulation in Free Speech Principle The commitment to the principle of freedom of expression is of great significance to the society and so it has become necessary to spell out as clearly as possible the nitty-gritty of this commitment. From this angle, free speech as a matter of fact, does not mean that a person is free to say whatever that person wants to say. However, as has been observed over a period of time, plenty of speeches have been regulated, be it legally or illegally. Furthermore, Mary Kate McGowan buttresses the argument of regulation since she believes that regulation of a speech is perfectly compatible with the commitment to free speech. Paradoxically, too, this same commitment to the principle of free speech is making
To provide fair and constitutionally aligned opportunities for speakers on controversial topics, all publicly funded establishments need to develop a committee comprised of varied members with academic prestige. In addition to this, strictly enforced protest behavioral codes are essential to ensure civil obedience and prevent property damage or personal injury. If fair and balanced public forum offerings are not prospectively adhered to or if institutions do not maintain civil order, funding should be withdrawn or financial penalties should be applied. The first amendment of the United States Constitution provides US citizens with freedom to express their views. The amendment states, “Congress shall make no laws… abridging the freedom of speech… or the right of the people peaceably