However, reelection being the motivator of members of Congress isn’t necessarily a bad thing. The motivation to be reelected incentivizes members of Congress to enact legislation and constantly work to improve the lives of citizens. Regardless of motive, as long as legislation is being passed through the House and members of Congress like Representative Long are improving the conditions of their district, the purpose of government is being
“Whenever the people are well informed they ca be trusted with their own government; whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notes, they may by relied on to set them to rights” (Jefferson 1789). Thomas Jefferson believed that people should be able to run their own government and to just let nature rule. He trusts that all people wanted to be good and would be good if they were left alone. Thought that if a person messed up people should just work it out among themselves and the government should stay out of it. Jefferson thought that people would be better off without a government ruling over them.
The founding fathers attempted to balance order with liberty. They wanted to avoid tyranny, allowing others to participate in politics; giving people a voice. Their foresight into the future affairs of government is believable. If we take in look on how the United States is now, many can argue that the government take advantage of people. A lot of people think that the government gives enough for people to survive, but not enough to keep people poor.
Each of his arguments are as the title suggests, “common sense.” He begins with the distinctions of society from government. Paine states that society is something good in which people have common interest and get together to accomplish something, but distinguishes government as , “… in its best state of necessary evil…”(3). Government is only present to ensure that no wrong doing is being done and the laws are obeyed. If the people gain independence they can start to form their own government but one that is useful with all their opinions. A government which them, themselves, create.
Nowadays, we could think that the world is an amazing place where thanks to laws everyone can enjoy their live in peace. however, it is not like that, eventhougt there are thousends of laws that should protect people fom iniquities, they just protect mayorities on the population leaving the weak and small groups without legal support. The thought shared by Dr. Martin Luther King on the Letter from Birmingham Jail "An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself", this shows how back in the twenty century laws were not exactly created thinking ethically, and a century after that there are still unjust laws. An example of legal but not ethical law is the
This example does not have to deal with how to interpret the constitution, yet it is an example of what signing statements have done to clarify bills. It would have been ridiculous to veto the bill. On a more serious note, presidents can address the issues that would interfere with the Constitution yet still sign the law that would give the benefits to where it is needed. Signing statements are an efficient way to provide for the country yet still
Ultimately, the idea of equality among the people and government became a major concern. However, resulting in a war from a dispute did not bring satisfaction to anybody. Instead, The Revolutionary War was “not revolutionary” because it did not significantly change the lives of British citizens, African Americans or women during and after the war. Others may think the Revolutionary War was revolutionary is because the government was primarily well established by the citizens. For example, in an excerpt from The American Revolution Considered as a Social Movement, it states that this was the first time that the government was powered by citizens.
Personal records given to the NSA or government without a probable cause or reasoning for a search warrant repels everything the Fourth Amendment represents. As said by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis “Now the right to life has come to the right to be let alone” with the government and other associations receiving the right to track records at any moment takes away from the feeling of security the Fourth Amendment is supposed to give citizens. The confidentiality of individual’s personal belongings, feeling of security, and freedom from governmental obstruction is what makes the Fourth Amendment important to society, although search-warrants can be issued with causes that seem reasonable.
As a result of all of this the Bill of Rights gave people the freedom to speak their mind and not get in trouble for it. If we did not have this right then Heroes like Martin Luther King, Mahatma Ghandi, and Eleanor Roosevelt would have never came in to play. The Agrarian party supports and protects the people and the government but keeps both sides balanced and that’s how it should be in an relationship between government and the people in my own personal opinion. In response to this letter I firmly believe that the Agrarian party is much more ethical and valuable to the
The source presented provided a perspective opposed to isolationism and governments who implement the policy in their nations. Furthermore, the source implements that no nation can be a democratic state if it puts into effect the isolationism policy. However, this source should not be embraced at all. First, for a nation to be considered a democratic state it must posses a government that derives its power from the citizens and is accountable to them for its use. Furthermore isolationism is a policy of non-involvement in international affairs, which does not infringe on the rights of citizens provided that the nation desires it.
Rather than desire better integration policies, these groups seek exemption from various laws. This view contradicts with nation building as the purpose of nation building is to integrate citizens into a modern societal culture (Kymlicka 356). However, most democratic states allow these groups to separate from the rest of society but impose internal restrictions so these isolationist groups do not harm people inside the
He says "The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves- in their separate, and individual capacities." Throughout the quote, he is saying that the government isn 't meant to help its citizens maintain peace and establish justice. The reality is, is that the government plays a huge role in making our everyday lives better, which is why we are not at war everyday with another country or settling a feud between states. This furthermore supports Jefferson 's claim that a government is established to ensure peace and protect its citizens rights. Like Jefferson said, the purpose of the American government is to keep its citizens safe and to protect our pursuit of happiness among other unalienable rights.
Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts. The government is stealing bits of the people 's power in order to increase theirs,
Is National Security better than Personal Privacy? People fear their loss of privacy, but the government is trying to protect us. The 4th Amendment states that citizens have the right to protect their privacy and should not be violated without a warrant. The Patriot Act was passed to protect citizens from terrorism. However, privacy is always a good thing to have but when it comes to protecting our country national security is the best way to go.