ipl-logo

Lincoln Vs Douglass Pros And Cons

533 Words3 Pages

There is always someone trying to take a supreme being with power down. People often try to outsmart one another with their words and actions just so they can exceed you in life. The outcome is usually for an essential place in life. Between Lincoln and Douglas, it took 7 different debates to just get the right results. The debates between Lincoln and Douglas were seen as an important event in history due to Lincoln being the underdog, their views on slavery and the outcome.

Douglas was already entitled as a “Senator”, therefore everyone was familiar with him and his arrangements. He had an abundance of appropriate power and knew how to take action with it. However, there was a soon opponent to Douglas and he was a complete stranger to him and most of Illinois. Abraham Lincoln was his name, he was a complete nobody that wanted to take the title over Douglas. As Lincoln was a republican, Douglas was a democrat. Lincoln was seen to be the underdog, he came out of the shadows and challenged Douglas who was a well-known being. People soon found him courageous for his nonchalant debate thrown at …show more content…

Douglas had the power and the advanced tactics against Lincoln, so when he would declare that slavery wasn’t immoral, people would often follow and think what he thought. Popular sovereignty is what he referred to during these heated debates, also stated how he wanted to expand slavery across the country and claim territories for his own. Lincoln on the other hand wanted to oppose slavery. Was part of some sort of anti-slavery party and entitled himself to support “free soilers”. Free Soilers were free men who basically belonged on free land. Lincoln also spoke out to the legislatures about outlawing slavery. Both candidates fired back at each other about who was right and who wasn’t, they also seemed to like “calling out” each other's plans and futuristic

Show More
Related

  • The Gadsden Purchase Treaty

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sectional Tensions Gadsden Purchase: The Gadsden Purchase was a treaty made in 1853 by James Gadsden of South Carolina. Gadsden was appointed by Secretary of War Jefferson Davis to secure a chunk of Mexico for a railway route. He was able to negotiate land along the southern tips of current day Arizona and New Mexico, the northern border of Mexico, for $10 million from Spaniard Santa Anna. The land Gadsden had managed to obtain would have made making a southern railroad much more simple than cutting through more northern mountains.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln Peoria Speech Analysis

    1117 Words  | 5 Pages

    Amid both discourse Lincoln was running a political crusade. Lincoln was attempting to make a rebound to his political vocation amid his Peoria discourse, where he unequivocally talked against the Kansas-Nebraska Act and his position against the subjugation. The second discourse originates from the verbal confrontation amongst Lincoln and Douglas amid their battle for the senate situate from Illinois. In both discourses Lincoln never let out the slightest peep about giving equivalent rights to the Blacks in America. He was playing legislative issues with his supporters, at the purpose of time where dominant part of the country upheld servitude, a pioneer going to the mass advancing his arrangement to annul subjection and give approach ideal to the Blacks would never succeed. "

    Read More

  • How Did Stephen Douglass Win The Election Of 1860

    692 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1858 Stephen Douglas a spokesman for the Democratic Party, was seeking reelection to a third term in the U.S. Senate, and Abraham Lincoln was running for Douglas’s Senate seat as a Republican. Douglas and Lincoln traveled across the state of Illinois in a series of debates hitting seven of the nine Congressional Districts. Douglas and Lincoln each took turns discussing party politics, the future of the nation, and the most important topic slavery. Who won the debates, is the question that is still being asked in the year 2016. Through my own personal study and review of The Lincolns Douglas Debates, it is my personal opinion that Stephen Douglas not Abraham Lincoln won the debates because of how the election system was set up in 1858, by

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Decision Of 1857: The Lincoln-Douglas Debates Of 1860

    1715 Words  | 7 Pages

    Where a not so well known Republican, Abraham Lincoln, challenged the reputable Democrat, Stephen A. Douglas, to a series of seven open-air debates to be done throughout Illinois on the issue of slavery in territories. Douglas supported popular sovereignty, which is the allowing of inhabitants of a territory to vote for or against slavery in that territory. He also held that slavery was not immoral, but thought an unsuitable labor system for some places. Lincoln, on the other hand, held that slavery was immoral, and a labor system based on greed. The main difference between Lincoln and Douglas was that Douglas believed popular sovereignty would inevitably lead to slavery ceasing on its own, while Lincoln saw the only way to end slavery was through legislation.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Lincoln And Frederick Douglass

    184 Words  | 1 Pages

    Both Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln were heroic men who fought for liberty and freedom. Douglass was a slave during the Civil War until Douglass became a free man. Douglass attended a conference where he found the courage to speak about slavery. A quote in the Springboard Book on page 72 states, “ I spoke but a few moments, when I felt a degree of freedom, and said what I desired with considerable ease.” Douglass realized that he had the freedom to speak what he believed in after so long being forced into silence.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Frederick Douglass

    699 Words  | 3 Pages

    Frederick Douglass was a slave who escaped to freedom 1838, but many other slaves weren’t as lucky as he was. Many slaves used the same method Douglass used, forging passes, and they made their way to free states with any personal items they had, like clothing and jewelry. People would then remain free by avoiding authorities at all costs, and using aliases and fake names to avoid identification to be sold back into slavery again. There were various strategies of escaping that people used, such as forging passes and acting as ‘sailors’ as Frederick Douglass did. Others used more primitive methods, such as simply running from the authorities.

    Read More

  • How Did Stephen Douglass Encourage The Support Of Popular Sovereignty

    667 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stephen Douglas, an advocate of popular sovereignty, and Abraham Lincoln, a Republican candidate, were both running to represent Illinois in the United States Senate. These two men met in a sequence of seven debates before they battled for office of presidency in the election of 1858. Slavery eventually became the main issue discussed repeatedly in each of the debates, due to the Mexican War adding new territories left to be assessed as free soil or not. During this time, the Compromise of 1850 was a temporary fix to the sectional issues for the states that made the decision to participate in the extension of slavery. However, the Missouri Compromise of 1854 brought the issue back up again.

    Read More

  • The Life And Accomplishments Of Stephen A. Douglas

    517 Words  | 3 Pages

    During these debates, Lincoln tried to force Douglas into being more decisive, eventually getting him to make what is now called the Freeport

    Read More

  • What Did Lincoln Say About The Problems With The Law Using Metaphors

    694 Words  | 3 Pages

    By comparing the two Lincoln is saying that the founding fathers created a solid political system. However, he is also saying that it does not work because not everyone is respecting it. By saying this Lincoln emphasizes the fact that the Founding Fathers have created a good system and that it is the people who are beginning to destroy it. Without this metaphor the way Lincoln felt about the founding fathers would not have been as clear.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln And Slavery Dbq

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    Opinions, speech, slavery, and 1858, all of these things all have one thing in common, Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was not like other politicians of his time. After leaving politics to focus on being a lawyer he reentered the world of politics to voice his opinion on the Kansas-Nebraska Act. This act was brought to motion after both Kansas and Nebraska both asked to become an official state in America. The idea was that each state would be able to choose whether or not to be a slave stare or a free state; this idea was called ‘popular sovereignty’.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Frederick Douglass

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    Perseverance is a trait that you will find in most Americans. This trait has carried throughout many great Americans such as Abraham Lincoln, when he persevered to get the nation back together as a whole and he succeeded. He worked hard as possible to help prevent the nation splitting up. Frederick Douglass was a man that struggled so greatly during his life . He was never taken seriously because he was a black male, and at the time no one took any black person seriously.

    Read More

  • Lincoln Douglass Debate Essay

    633 Words  | 3 Pages

    Douglas as a devoted Jacksonian insisted that power in communities should be held at local levels and reflect the wishes of the people. Lincoln on the other hand beleived that these kinds of decisions hsould be decided at a govenmental level and hat hte opinion of hte people mattered little as long as the county and the masses benifited (History.com Staff,

    Read More

  • Differences Between Lincoln And Frederick Douglass

    691 Words  | 3 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln, Frederic Douglass, were one of the most appealing well-known speakers, people who did believe that slavery was morally wrong and devote their lives to fight for freedom. However, there are several differences between the view of the Constitution’s position differences between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Kansas-Nebraska Act indicated that the recognition of slavery should be determined by the decision of these residents (popular or squatter sovereignty). This act itself conflicted heavily with the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, which was essentially seen as the admittance of slavery anywhere in the country. This act made a political issue of confrontation between North and South.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Lincoln And Frederick Douglass

    815 Words  | 4 Pages

    Lincoln and Douglass were self-made, self-educated, and ambitious, and each rose to success from humble backgrounds. Douglass, of course, was an escaped slave. Douglass certainly and Lincoln most likely detested slavery from his youngest days. But Lincoln from his young manhood was a consummate politician devoted to compromise, consensus-building, moderation and indirection. Douglass was a reformer who spoke and wrote eloquently and with passion for the abolition of slavery

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    Douglas, was an important election that would, and did, go down in history. Lincoln had opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, created by Stephen Douglas, which lead him into becoming a Republican. Here, nobody was able to Compromise. He ran against Stephen Douglas, and won the election with getting one hundred eighty electoral votes, and Douglas getting twelve (Southern Democrat Breckinridge seventy-two, and Constitutional Union Bell getting thirty-nine) (Doc H).

    Read More

More about Lincoln Vs Douglass Pros And Cons

Open Document