On other hand, the most places in university reserved for service-class children. Service - class has much more privileges. 'Diversion thesis ' which was suggested by Muller and Pollak and extended by Hillmer and Jacob, approves written above. In most cases working-class children less likely have prospective success in University education, so most of them refrain from it. The main problem of this research is: Social inequality, people from lower-class cannot afford good education for their children, while people from upper-class can get best education for their children.
This means less time is spent with their children thus cognitive implications may arise. Working mothers are more often to drop their children at day care centres than stay-at-home mothers. There are a lot of day care centres in the world, some can be of low quality. Under-qualified, over strained staff and poor service (Secure Teen 2013) might lead to sexual mistreat, neglect and lack of concern (Newsweek 1990) that can heavily affect a child’s physical and psychological health. A study by the Institute for Social and Economic Research (Carvel 2003) also associated lower educational development in children of working mothers.
Some of them could be well in maths, while the majority is struggling with counting and so on (Lusardi et al. 2010, 23). Money flow controlling should be taught by school teachers, not parents. First of all, financial knowledge that is gained from parents or via the interaction with others can be not only beneficial, but also disadvantageous for the young learner. For instance, according to the results of the scientific research conducted by the Center for Financial Studies on the topic of financial literacy amongst young, respondents whose parents and close friends have no college degree in finances were 16 percentage points less likely to be aware of risk diversification, which is very crucial for saving and investment decisions (Lusardi et al.
Recently schools lunches have played a big factor in obesity with children. Every year the ratings go up due to school lunches many schools don’t take the time to actually make the lunch’s right. One of the main problems is that schools don’t provide enough fruit and vegetables (WhatsForLunch.com). Ann cooper and Lisa m. Holmes made it clear that the only reason why French fries are allowed in the school cafeteria’s is because they are baked. (WhatsForlunchNyc.com, 1) Researchers have found that another reason why school lunches effect children is because the school lunches don’t provide enough nutrients.
According to Hart and Risley’s (1995) study, children from poverty backgrounds have a smaller vocabulary than children who are from more affluent families. Most of the learners living in these conditions do not have access to books or libraries and their parents were not educated to help them with their language skills. Poverty contributes to poor circumstances in the homes of the learners, they do not have electricity, enough food or somewhere to do their homework and these factors may impact
Single parents are earning less because there is only one source of income. They need to work double time in order to support their living. Given that, many single parents are spending more time working than bonding with his/her children. Their time was divided unequally with their work and their children. Because of lack of attention, children may become a rebel, do bad things, and in worst cases, use drugs.
An average student would spend hours on schoolwork a day, which can be very stressful. A high school student will use half of their day around school relation. Almost all elementary to high school students will likely to agree that homework should not be assigned. The majority of students complain about homework yet teachers don’t usually understand why. While homework gives benefits to students, unnecessary homework should not be assigned due to the fact that there are enough school hours, it consumes time, and the development of poor health is encouraged.
In Suskind's book "Thirty Million Words:Building a Child's Brain", she talked about a study done over 30 years ago that stated that children who thrive better in life are children who heard a lot more words. The study stated that overall language is dependent on socioeconomic status because they hypothesized that children who come from more affluent familiys are more likely to do better in school. This idea is more of a reverse casuality situation because who is to say that being in poverty causes a language defecit or if having a language defecit causes poverty. This theory also puts the pressure on minority families by blaming them for not talking to their children enough, when in reality a childs language should be measured more on the quality of words they are using rather than the quantity. Knowing 30 million words can not gurantee you a life with no scrutinty and by these reasearches stating that this is what makes or breaks a child is detrimental to the pubic school education.
Homework is done by every student in school, starting in kindergarten, but the question is - is it a useful learning tool? Homework basically forces students to go home after a stressful day of school to do pointleskas assignments. These ideas should be taught and worked on in class. Students should not have to learn by themselves. Homework prevents children from leading balanced lives.
Ultimately, this sets an unfair advantage to those who can afford it, while those who cannot are left in a cycle of underperformance that they did not choose. It can be argued that being in an undesirable situation like this does not completely diminishes the ability to perform well in school and that there are success stories from students in poverty, but it is still a lot more difficult than those who are born into a privileged family. Schools in more poverty dense areas do not have as good an education as those in more upper class neighbourhoods, even for public schools. This lowers the possibility for these students to get into post-secondary