Literature review leadership and change management
In recent years, the tons of literatures on leadership but there is a gray area when it comes to it definition. Reason been it understanding, differs from one individual to another. However, for the purpose of attaining a common ground of understanding one need to define leadership. In addition, if each defines leadership differently one need to know the weak and strong definition of leadership. In Bass and Stogdill (1990) research, were the investigated the concept and definition of leadership were made. The stated, form weak and strong definitions “evidence should suggest that while both may be incomplete, both are in some measure correct” (Bass and Stogdill, 1990 p. 8). These means, from
…show more content…
Which bring one to the new era of leadership, by comparing to the traditional definition of leadership where leadership is theorize as individual characteristics, traits and how are leaders formed. That is, are leaders made or born. As presented by Rost (1991), there are few study on leadership that are focus on the approaches of leadership, and how leaders and followers relate in archiving a set goal. Rost argued further, change in an individual or an organisation can attain through collaboration, cultural difference, open platform where individuals are free in expressing their opinion, and concerns for other in the globe (Eddy, …show more content…
Just like leadership, change management as no agreed upon definition however researcher have all tried establishing connection between each definition from a holistic approach. Burnes (2002), stated there are different approaches to the concept of change management is due to the cross-matrixes characteristics of the topic. There are change management theories that suggest managers can make a change to the structure of an organisation, by the way, the work known as voluntarism. While some authors have confronted, the fact manager can make any change at all to an organisation structure. Because, managers are said to be limited in skills that enable them manage change. Toffler (1977), analyze the need for organizational change management. Moreover, change management came about, due to constant change in environment and needed new ways in addressing change. Especially, how the need for change are interlinked between organizations and worlds economy. However, the author concept argued by other authors on how survival and adaptation are used during the change management. Rather than, focusing on the economic model one focuses on organizational
Some of the changing management models include – Lewin’s change management model, McKinsey 7 – S Model, Nudge Theory, the ADKAR change management model, Kubler – ross change curve, Bridges transition model, Satir change model, Kotter's theory, Maurer 3
In current business environment, change is a common element that is continuously occurring irrespective of an organisations size, industry and age. As the world is changing, organisations must also change quickly to stay competitive. According Kotter (1996), organisations that handle change well thrive whilst those that do not either fail or struggle to survive. In this literature, the change that organisation XYZ underwent will be linked to Kurt Lewins 3-step model of change namely unfreeze, change and refreeze. In addition, will be the discussion of other key change management models such as Kotters 8 step model and Procsi model.
Winston and Patterson (2006) integrative definition of leadership is an excellent definition of leadership. Thus, Hitler also fits the definition only the most important ingredient is missing from Hitler leadership, which would be the presence of the Lord. There as been an enormous amount of information on the definition of leadership however, Bass (1990) argues that Leadership has been the focus of group processes, as a personality attribute, as the art of inducing compliance, as an exercise of influence, as a kind of act, as a form of persuasion, as a power relation, as an instrument in the attainment of goals, as an effect of nitration, as a differentiated role, and as the initiation of structure (20).
Leadership is a process of interactions between leader and other staff, where a leader is as a guidance that inspires other staff with vision (Marquis & Houston, 2012). A well known type of leadership theory are transformational leadership which were said has a positive
Personal Leadership Philosophy According to me, Leadership is where a person can motivate and influence people around him to accomplish a vision without any coercion. When a person is able to move and evolve people’s life towards a transformational change with their support, he is an effective leader. Someone who can connect people to see his vision and make them work towards his mission with the core values he laid down is a sign of a great leader. A great leader should be a visionary leader and able to motivate his employees / followers to do tasks willingly rather than using his power influence as a boss.
Leadership has been defined in a variety of ways, there are multiple authors and theorists who have tried to define and understand leadership, all leading to varying theories and conclusions, but one thing that is universally understood is the importance of effective leadership and how someone with good leadership skills can impact so many people around them. (Kakabadse and Kakabadse, 1999; Yukl, 2002; Northouse,2013) The main components that have been identified to play a role in leadership are relations between leader and subordinates, interaction form between leader and followers, the influence that the leader has, the way in which the leader behaves and finally a leader’s traits. (Yukl, 2002) These elements that make up a leader, are then used as building blocks to identify the way in which each specific leader deals with its followers.
Leadership literature review confirms that the concept of leadership embraces series of evolving of thought from the oldest great man and trait theories to the recent -transformational leadership. While early theories tend to focus upon the characteristics and behaviors of successful leaders, later theories begin to consider the role of followers and the contextual nature of leadership in an organization. 2.2.1. Great Man Theory of Leadership Great man theory, as the earliest approach to studying leadership, asserts that the capacity for leadership is inherent in that great leaders are born, not made. This theory often describes leaders as heroic, mythic and destined to rise to leadership when needed.
Change management should be carried out in conjunction with other management activities. Leveraging Change Leadership (vision for change), change management (enables people pursue a common goal) and project management (structure for change) would potentially create the highest value to the
Individual Reflective Paper Introduction Leadership, a controversial concept, has been studied for centuries. Scholars who study leadership have argued with the insight of leadership for many decades and finally promote a wide range of understandings of it. This course “values and leadership” introduces the basic principles and concepts about leadership, and provides us with some conceptual knowledge and practical approaches to be an outstanding leaders. I chose to take this course because I am interested in the topic about leadership.
According to our group discussion in term of “leadership” in business world, leadership is not just the person who have the job title or higher range position in an organization but leader is the person who knows the way and ability to demonstrate the possible way to
Leadership: Definition Leadership is the process of influencing the motive of the employees and so directing, guiding them to the proper completion of the short-term goals and the mission, vision of the firm. Leadership referring to achieve a specific set of goals of the business enterprise by minimizing risk and more advantage of opportunities is also called Entrepreneurial Leadership (Rao, 2015). Today leadership is such an iterative process when the leaders should have a variety of qualities and expertise in different area of management. Here, different theories will be explained which can clearly identify the scope, the responsibilities and the area of expertise required to be successful leader.
Firstly, if organisation members do not consider leadership as a mode of understanding and managing cultural change, leaders cannot find a target to lead. Hence, people who attempt to influence meaning with leadership might find his or her leadership identity at risk. Secondly, even if followers agree that leadership is the appropriate way to understand and manage cultural change, different interpretation on leadership and quality of leadership might create misfit (Alvesson, Blom & Sveningsson, 2017). In short, whether and how leadership is significant in understanding and managing organisation cultural change highly depends on
‘Organizations provide its managers with legitimate authority to lead, but there is no assurance that they will be able to lead effectively’ (Lunenburg, 2011). Organizational success usually requires a combination of both management and leadership. In today’s dynamic work environment, leaders are expected to challenge the present state of affairs, and to motivate and convince organization members. Managers are needed to assist in creating and maintaining a positive and well-functioning workplace. ‘Leadership and management are often considered practically overlapping concepts’ (Bohoris and Vorria, 2007, p. 1).