Literature Review Of Capital Punishment In The Philippines

Review of Related Literature

Capital punishment which is otherwise called "death penalty" is a lawful procedure where the state sends a passing column detainee to execution as their discipline for a genuine offense submitted. The idea of punishment, its definition, application and justification in the previous century is connected on the reorganizations coming about to nullifying of capital punishments in numerous societies of the world; offenders are turned beneficiaries of rehabilitation in support of reprisal and imprisonment. On Plato’s theory, execution benefits the criminal. Dissimilar to the contradicting backers of capital punishment, death penalty is a relinquishment of the criminal’s renewal and recovery. Instead he drew a similarity

In the Philippines, the act of the death penalty originates before written history, and only the rise of Mrs. Corazon Aquino to the presidency and making a new constitution was the capital punishment abolished in 1987. In 1993, the Ramos administration reinstated capital punishment through Republic Act 7659. On last 2006, Capital punishment in the Philippines has been suspended. During the Ferdinand Marcos regime, capital punishment or also known as the death penalty was legalized after independence and also during the Marcos regime the use of death penalty increased in use. During 1987-1999, the capital punishment in the Philippines had a moratorium or had been postponed. Not long enough, during 1999- 2006 the capital punishment or the death penalty in the Philippines continued in executions, followed by a law ending the practice. On current events there is a huge possibility that the death penalty law is more likely to return in the Philippines under the Rodrigo Duterte regime. Many are opposing it on religious and humanitarian grounds, while others advocates see it

By his past action the criminal has shown himself to be wicked and dangerous. Anybody deprived enough to murder or assault one is probably going to act in socially harmful ways once more. The only way to keep a person from going to murder or assault later on is to execute him. Detainment is a far less effective method for protecting society from such dangerous criminals. Most detainees are freed after a period frequently become most risky than when they entered jail by parole, pardon or the expiration of their sentences. Regardless, escape is constantly conceivable. And even inside prison, a condemned criminal may murder or assault a jail guard, a fellow inmate or even a guest. Execution is the only way to keep him from perpetrating additional acts of crime. Since it is the only right to ensure safety to the innocent people in the society from the most genuine crimes, capital punishment is sometimes right. Granted that society would be unjustified in taking a man’s life in discipline for any trivial wrongdoing, capital punishment is only reprisal for the greatest crimes. For an instance a person has killed another person, it is just fair that he give his own particular life consequently. Kidnapping and assault are likewise wrong that the individual who commits these acts deserves the best punishment, death. Justice requests that each individual be treated with