Little Albert Ethical Theory
In 1920, Watson and Rayner used infant Albert B. “Little Albert” in an unprecedented experiment of conditioned fear (Watson & Rayner, 1920). Little Albert was discharged from the experiment as an infant and his real identity and welfare remained a mystery until Beck, Levinson & Irons published their identity findings in 2009 (Beck, Levinson, & Irons, 2009). According to Beck et al. (2009), Little Albert (Douglas Merritte), had developed hydrocephalus after the study and died. In addition to Beck et al. (2009) work, Fridlund, Goldie and Irons (2012) stated the hydrocephalus was diagnosed shortly after birth. Furthermore, they allege that Watson and Rayner (1920) unethically chose to perform the study despite Douglas being neurologically impaired. …show more content…
(2009) and Fridlund et al. (2012) respectively. However, these hypotheses have gained much traction in the wider psychological community despite Powell, Digdon, Harris and Smithson (in press) theorizing a much more compelling candidate, Albert Barger. Ethics in psychology is a contemporary consideration and this fresh perspective has dictated a popular practice of re-examining the ethics of historical experiments with superfluous criticism. It is plausible that the outrage over possible unethical practice has distracted from the more parsimonious option presented by Powell et al. (in press). Perhaps Little Albert was the healthy and well-developed infant Watson and Rayner (Watson & Rayner, 1920) had described and was treated ethically as was appropriate at the time. Furthermore, his developmental welfare is still
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1007 Words | 5 PagesThere was so much that happened here that was so, so wrong, all because of power. In this paper, I will be explaining why this experiment could not, and should not, be conducted today. The first major point in the ethical rules of experimentation
Opening Skinner's Box Analysis
426 Words | 2 PagesSo, while there is and always will be controversy surrounding Skinner and his experiments, Skinner contributed a great quantity to the field of psychology. `Opening Skinner’s Box by, Lauren Slater tells of may different events, one of those being an experiment by David Rosenhan trying to determine how well psychiatrists can tell apart sane and insane people. David Rosenhan called up a group of eight of his friends to ask an outrageous question. David Rosenhan asked his friends, “Are you busy next month? Would you have time to fake your way into a mental hospital and see what happens, see if they can tell you’re really sane?”
Pavlov Classical Conditioning Experiment
796 Words | 4 PagesAlbert was noted to be a healthy baby who reacted negatively to almost nothing and rarely cried. Watson presented Albert with a white rat and followed with a loud banging noise. After repeating this several times, Albert was conditioned into being afraid of the rat on its own, and had a similar reaction to other furry, white animals, and even Santa Claus! Watson therefore concluded that despite the fact that human brains were far more complex than a dog’s, the same ideas could be
Nazis Medical Experiments During World War II
2216 Words | 9 PagesWithout the subjects' knowledge or agreement, these tests were conducted with utter disregard for their welfare. The protection of human life and dignity cannot be compromised in the name of scientific progress. They serve as a sobering reminder of the value of sustaining moral standards in all scientific study and the ethical ramifications of these experiments, which are still being argued today. The legacy of the Nazi medical experiments serves as a sobering reminder of the atrocities that may be perpetrated in the name of a belief system and the repercussions of disrespecting human
Little Albert Experiment: A Case Study Of The Little Albert Experiment
2094 Words | 9 PagesThe Little Albert experiment was a case study showing empirical evidence of classical conditioning in humans. The study also provides an example of stimulus generalization. It was carried out by John B. Watson and his graduate student, Rosalie Rayner, at Johns Hopkins University. The results were first published in the February 1920 issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology. After observing children in the field, Watson hypothesized that the fearful response of children to loud noises is an innate unconditioned response.
Unethical Human Experimentation
886 Words | 4 PagesHuman experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.
Ethical Principles Of Milgram's Study Of Obedience
1103 Words | 5 PagesEthical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical, or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience, which investigated participants ' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram 's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.
History Of Psychology: The Stanford Prison Experiment
284 Words | 2 PagesOne of the most infamous experiments conducted in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. The main objective of this experiment was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I read through the material provided, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that it was a complete failure as a scientific research project. However, his findings did provide us with something much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.
Essay On The Stanford Prison Experiment
921 Words | 4 PagesIn the case of Little Albert, the two stimuli were a white rat and a loud bang. Prior to conditioning Albert demonstrated fear in response to a loud bang but reacted positively to the white rat, (Prytula, Oster, & Davis, 1977, p. 44). However “on seven occasions, the experimenters presented the rat, followed by a sudden loud noise. They then found that Albert reacted fearfully to the rat alone,” (Hobbs, 2010, p.
Milgram Experiment
967 Words | 4 PagesThe Milgram Study is one of the most controversial of psychology experiments. Stanley Milgram, a social psychologist at Yale University, desired to test the obedience to authority. The experiment was setup with “teachers” who were the actual participants and a “learner”. Both the teacher and the learner were told that the study was about memory and learning. The Milgram study was conducted in 1961-1962.
Flowers For Algernon Ethical Analysis
491 Words | 2 PagesThey based their study around their egos and advancing science in unnecessary terms, rather than helping those who needed
Beecher's Argument Essay: The Ethics Of Human Experimentation
1027 Words | 5 PagesIntroduction: Human experimentation has been a contentious issue for a long time, and philosophers have been engaged in a debate on its moral permissibility. Some argue that it can be morally right if appropriate changes can be made, while others claim that it is inherently wrong and, therefore, will always be morally impermissible. This paper aims to explore the debate between two philosophers, Beecher and Hellman, who hold different views on human experimentation. Beecher's Argument Beecher's argument is that human experimentation can be morally right if it is carried out in a way that minimizes harm to participants. He argues that experiments should be designed to benefit humanity, and the risks involved should be outweighed by the potential
Summary Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
654 Words | 3 PagesDelving into the ethics behind the Stanford Prison Experiment done by Philip Zimbardo, it has come to the public’s attention the questionability as to whether or not the experiment had followed traditional scientific manner. If the research does not follow ethical guidelines, then there is reason to believe the Stanford Prison Experiment was corrupt due to the lack information to participants, and absence of human morals Mr. Zimbardo portrayed during the time of his findings. Ethical rules provide the guidelines used to identify what is wrong and right. These decisions occur with the daily lives of average people, influencing the way they interact with the world. In the Prison Experiment, participants were not fully disclosed information about the study, resulting in stressful measures and ultimately traumatizing those who took part.
Einstein's Theory Of Ethical Egoism
757 Words | 4 PagesEthical egoism is a normative theory that states an individual 's actions must be done from the perspective to maximize one’s self-interest. Ethical egoism requires that people give special treatment to themselves, and that they have a duty to serve their self-interest. Ethical egoism holds that a person should act only when the action benefits them, and they should therefore refrain from actions when the act provides no benefits for them. When one action is wrong the opposite of the action would seem to be one that is correct. If helping a person would prevent your own self-interest, this would seem to make it morally permissible for a person to perform harm to others in situations where their self-interest would benefit from the action.
Stanford Prison Experiment Case Study
779 Words | 4 PagesIt showed how normal civilians acted when they were given authority over others. Even the most cordial, intelligent people can take on an evil, machiavellianistic nature when introduced to a dominant role in an individualized setting. This experiment taught psychologists so many things about human behavior and the prison system. It is an event that is taught in classrooms all over the world. While some people question the ethics of the experiment, it paved the way for more understanding as well as the reform of psychological practices
More about Little Albert Ethical Theory
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1007 Words | 5 PagesOpening Skinner's Box Analysis
426 Words | 2 PagesPavlov Classical Conditioning Experiment
796 Words | 4 PagesNazis Medical Experiments During World War II
2216 Words | 9 PagesLittle Albert Experiment: A Case Study Of The Little Albert Experiment
2094 Words | 9 PagesUnethical Human Experimentation
886 Words | 4 PagesEthical Principles Of Milgram's Study Of Obedience
1103 Words | 5 PagesHistory Of Psychology: The Stanford Prison Experiment
284 Words | 2 PagesEssay On The Stanford Prison Experiment
921 Words | 4 PagesMilgram Experiment
967 Words | 4 PagesFlowers For Algernon Ethical Analysis
491 Words | 2 PagesBeecher's Argument Essay: The Ethics Of Human Experimentation
1027 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
654 Words | 3 PagesEinstein's Theory Of Ethical Egoism
757 Words | 4 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Case Study
779 Words | 4 Pages