For years the Little League World Series (LLWS) has been played the same way with the same rules. However, starting in 2018 the rules will be changed. No longer will there be any thirteen year olds allowed to play in the series. Currently, the age cutoff for the LLWS is set on April 30th, but once the rule changes, the cutoff will be August 31st. The cutoff date means that any player that turns the age of thirteen before that date will not be eligible to represent their county in trying to go to the LLWS. Now if this rule had been enforced for the 2015 LLWS then sixty-seven out of 209 people would not have been eligible to play (Wire 1). That statistic is outrageous. The LLWS officiators are trying to basically remove one-third of the competition. …show more content…
The officiator’s argument is that the thirteen year olds simply are too developed and stand out too much. The number of hits, homeruns, and no-hitters being thrown by the thirteen year olds was outrageous. There was more no-hitters thrown in this past LLWS then there has been total by kids twelve and under. This past year also set a record for the most homeruns hit in the tournament. Now there is still some good that can come out of this rule change. The change as a whole is a bad idea, but there are some good effects that the change can cause. The change will align kids with the peers that they will eventually find themselves playing high school baseball with (Eaton-Robb 1). The change will allow the players to build better chemistry with their peers and ultimately have fun with their friends. Little League puts the players first, but they think more of the fun aspect of the game and don’t really think about the extremely competitive players in the league. Now during the twelve and thirteen year old age, kids do most of their growing. For some kids a few months of growing and developing can make a very big difference. Saying this, there are a few kids that just turned thirteen in the tournament that are clearly way more developed than other players, but outliers like this are going to pop up every once in a while. Just because there are a few kids that have developed …show more content…
Even though there are some good things that can arise from this change, there are just too many bad things that are caused from it. The Little League officiators should see that the good doesn’t outweigh the bad. They should see that the younger they try to make the league, the less people there are going to be actually competing and watching the LLWS. The LLWS is supposed to be a big deal that kids look forward to playing in and watching every year, and if they go through with this change then there will be less kids watching and playing. I hope that the officiators know what they are doing, and hopefully they will come to their senses and keep the current age rule that is currently being
The Little league president and the Dominican officials even backed up the team saying they were all of age. At that time the rules were strict due to a team in 1992 had overage players and they had their titles taken. Sports Illustrated reporters however, went to the record building in Moca and had found a birth ledger showing the actual age of Danny. They reported it on Sports Illustrated website before it was published which in turn caused the Little League to start a huge investigation. Even with the proof of his age, Danny's parents both said he was of age to play and that the documents were false.
Little League World Series The Little League World Series is a baseball tournament for kids of the age of eleven to thirteen. This tournament has been going on since 1947 in South Williamsport. The tournament has been broadcasted since 1982. There are two halves of the tournament, one half is in the United States and the other half is in the other countries all over the world.
Enforcing the “C rule” could also cause more scholarships for Webb City Students. If students are getting good grades and raising their grade point average then colleges would be more willing to give out scholarships. This also brings up the point that some people get scholarships just for the sports they play. If the “C rule” was enforced that would mean that any student who was playing sports would have good grades which would benefit them greatly when they go to college on the athletic scholarships. Most people will not end up in a professional athletic career , that is why education is so
There just supposed to be equality, but my question is that if it is supposed to be equality then how come there are kids out there that can't play a sport because they can't afford it. Some schools are heavy on charges for sports. I’ve seen them charge up to $200 and $300 that's
For example, better protective head gear and rules against head butting would allow less permanent damage and head-on-head contact. These changes could make the sport much safer for players, including young children that are being put in danger by playing football. The dangers of football concealed by the NFL were detrimental to the lives of many players, young and old, and their loved ones.
High school coaches should not be required to give equal playing time to all players who make the team. Kids in society have been handed things their entire life. There has been little to no sense of accomplishment after earning a spot or position on a team. Spots should be earned by being the best at what someone does, not for pitty and for moral victories to make them feel good. “In high school, kids should understand playing time is earned.
The one thing most young children love to be a part of when growing up. Plus, when you have a fun; supportive coach on your side that makes it a lot easier on them! “A complete team is having everybody on one accord, including the coaches!” (Smith) Most coaches are seen as role models to their young athletes growing up, but what happens behind closed doors that might lead people to think otherwise? This essay is going to stress three major points : How Little League/High School Coaching can ruin a young athlete’s spirit or dreams; different times when coaches throughout history have been in controversial
I know that my parents don't like the aim of the game. Some of the parents want their child to have more physical games than video games that destroy your brain, and parents don’t want their kids to be eliminated from the game. My opinion on the whole banning dodge ball thing is great. I myself want them to ban dodge ball from personal experience. Parents don’t agree with it.
Have you ever wanted to live an active and healthy life, as well as an improvement in grades? I believe youth sports will help all of those problems and many more. Most sports are team sports that also teach your child teamwork. Playing youth sports is a terrific experience for you or your child. There are many reasons why I feel that children should play youth sports.
Babe Ruth was really young when he first got signed to play professional baseball he was at the age of nineteen. Tons of people all over the world asked why babe their was all kinds of questions like is it because he is so young when he signed to play professional baseball. Babe was required to have legal guardianship and was then adopted by one of the monks. Other people across the united states of America say it was just because he was merely a babe. Babe Ruth played for three different teams when he played baseball.
However, some minor changes in the MLB aren’t so bad. For example, adding instant replay in 2014 only made the game more accurate (Hagen).That being said, the MLB should not implement automated strike zones because adding it would take away from originality of the game, take umpires out of business, and would
Youths should not be banned from participating in sports such as dodgeball, cheerleading, and football. To begin with, dodgeball teaches physical and mental education. According to the text, ”Rick Hanetho, founder of National Amatuer Dodgeball Association said,” It teaches hand-eye coordination, concentration, and to draw quick conclusions” (171). This proves that youths shouldn’t be banned from dodgeball since it teaches them at a young age and it teaches mental and physical lessons. As for cheerleading, youths shouldn’t be banned because the coaches are trained and certified.
The No Pass, No Play rule requires students to acquire excellent grades to play sports. Children in the same situation as Frances could be discouraged to try in school or even drop out of school. Sports may seem alarming at first glance, but digging deeper, it is present that sports aid children in their present and future endeavors. Not everyone lives the same lives.
Because of this, banning contact sports won’t mean no physical activity; other sports are still available to them and children most likely will go pick a different sport to play. Therefore contact sports should be banned for children under 18. In conclusion, contact sports are a dangerous sport because of the high chance of injury and the risk of brain damage so children under 18 should not be able to play it. Although obesity could become a problem, it most likely won’t because more children are getting active and playing other sports.
Children being vulnerable to harmful situations, such as the ones listed above, is one of the main reasons that the total number of children participating in competitive sports has been diminishing over the last few