People care what others think about them. People are taught by society about what is supposedly right and wrong and how to live life “correctly”. Societal expectations write a rule book for life that cannot help but create a rocky development for every individual within any culture. Therefore, these expectations cause more harm than good for individual’s development. One can look at any society or culture around the world and see expectations put forth from an invisible, omniscient character. The invisible character of society creates rules and guidelines to live by. For example, in American culture, a general guideline of life is to receive a higher education, pursue a career, marry, have children, raise them to live successfully, then die. …show more content…
Those who view the world through an imaginative lense see guidelines as obsolete. They believe they should be able to live their lives the way that they want, without someone pressuring them to be a certain way, dress a certain way, or speak a certain way. This pressure is damaging to the individual because it stifles creativity. In the article “Living Like Weasels”, Annie Dillard suggest that we have choices in life, and therefore can live any way we want, so we should live the way we are meant to (148). People are given so many opportunities in life, and it is fruitless to limit oneself and the knowledge one can gain just to fit in. Furthermore, the pressure to fit in encourages people to group themselves, and live within their group where they are comfortable. In the academic article, “The Complexity of Identity: ‘Who Am I?”, Beverly Daniel Tatum explains in detail how humanity would be much more peaceful and would be changed for the better if people were more aware of the complexities of their own identity and embraced everyone’s identities (349). Furthermore, she spoke about the oppression of subordinate groups of people based on identity, and the way dominant groups affect and are not knowledgeable of subordinate groups and the lack of the opposite (347-348). People are encouraged to accept the oppression they …show more content…
As aforementioned, pressure goes hand in hand with expectations, and this pressure can cause some to break. When one steps outside the comfort zone of their group and attempts to chase after the goals of their true self, there is added insecurity and lack of confidence within the self and pushed on the self from outside sources simply because it is an unconventional decision. In “Living Like Weasels”, Dillard talks about how one should live their lives like the weasel, a vicious creature who is persevering and holds on to things so tight that in death it is still hanging on(146-148). With lack of confidence, individuals struggle to stay perseverant and hang on. Furthermore, the article points toward looking at one’s own life and actions to find deeper meaning in small moments of life, and to look at the lives of others to see the richness life has to offer (148). However, when one is self conscious and concerned about the indecision of future, they are limiting their ability to see how much looking around them has to offer. In addition, some of the pressures that society puts forth may be false in their justification. According to society, lying is bad; when one lies, they are committing a morally unjust act. However, according to David Livingstone-Smith in his article titled “Natural-born Liars”, lying is an instinctual, biological act that all organisms, plants included, commit in
Every type of person struggles with a thing we call, identity. Personal identity come from multiple factors from our race to our own personal beliefs. Some people say we have the choice to choose our own identity, but is that always true? No, in fact other people can affect how we look and essentially identity our self’s. In the article called.
Pulitzer prize-winning nature writer Annie Dillard, in her essay “Living Like Weasels”, claims that humans should adopt the weasels’ way of life, living purely from necessity. Dillard’s purpose is to advise people to live happy lives by focusing on their true passions. She adopts a didactic tone to explain to her readers that living out of instinct is the best way to live. To begin her essay, Dillard describes the wild weasels’ habits by posing a question to herself and her readers, “who knows what he thinks?” (1).
In Annie Dillard “Living like the Weasel” she portrays the weasel as a cute little critter. But in reality, they are a murderous little critter. The weasels are a creature that she describes “can kill more bodies than he can eat warm.” (Dillard, Par. 1). The weasel are predators to their own set of preys like the rabbits, mice and birds.
This new conformity of those who once opposed the unspoken rules of society, places humanity one step closer to a bland and ordinary human
This can create an atmosphere in which can tear communities apart and destroy relationships. Judging due to preconceived notions results only in destruction and chaos, and fails to lead to anything positive. In modern society, it is so easy to judge and be judged due to what is seen initially, but ultimately, “You never truly understand a person until you walk a mile in their shoes”
They must find their true selves, and not be pressured by their parents or society to conform to the ‘norm’. Each individual is born to do something or be someone, and they have to find it within themselves. Finding this inner self most often comes after experiencing a sort of hardship in which the individual comes to realize their purpose. The individual will also experience callings towards its destiny, or signs that will try to lead the individual to its ultimate purpose. Hillman includes specific examples of this theory in The Soul’s Code.
As humans, we tend to set ourselves apart from other animals. As we see it, animals are mindless and base their choices on instinct or survival. However, humans are superior because we have developed intellect that influences our actions. Despite this thought, Annie Dillard has rejected these ideas in her essay “Living Like Weasels,” suggesting that we should all become more attuned with nature. She believes that nature has powerful messages to teach us.
Introduction Social identification is a very important source of both one’s pride and self-esteem. Because groups give us a sense of social identity and belongingness to the social world, intergroup relations have a huge impact on the actions we engage ourselves in. “We are not born with senses of self. Rather, self arises from interaction with others” (Griffin, 2012). In this paper I will first give a summary of Tajfel and Turner’s Social Identity Theory.
Euripides, a famous writer of tragedies in Ancient Greece, stated, “Nothing has more strength than dire necessity” (“Euripides”). Annie Dillard, Pulitzer Prize recipient, shares this theme in her non-fiction narrative “Living Like Weasels.” Through the production of non-fiction narrative essays, paintings, poetry, and books, she influences her audiences to think about life and the environment. In fact, she appreciates nature and its splendor. In “Living Like Weasels,” she contrasts the behavior of humans and animals while evaluating the meaning of life, and she establishes that living by necessity leads to a more fulfilling journey than striving to achieve the American Dream.
Any person of any identity can be prejudice to any person of any other identity. But that doesn’t make it oppression. It doesn’t even make it racism. This interpersonal interaction are reflections of and support structures for the larger problems of systematic inequality and oppression.
In “Living Like Weasels” by Annie Dillard, the author explores an encounter with a weasel and how this weasel inspired her to not only hunger for a change, but also in the way she lives her own life. Additionally, she says that she and a weasel had a connection when their eyes locked. When Dillard explains that one should live a life of their own choice, it is rather true. However, it is an absurd notion to believe the author and a weasel had an emotional connection considering an animal usually acts on instinct and not with emotion and thought patterns. Moreover, Dillard’s argument that people should live in the same manner as weasels, in that they should live by necessity, is compelling by virtue of the evidence she uses and the words in particular she uses.
“Rebel children, I urge you, fight the turgid slick of conformity with which they seek to smother your glory.” –Russell Brand Today’s society remains a complex paradox within itself, growing more and more ambiguous as people desire to simultaneously fit in and stand out. Conforming to today’s society also provides confusion because although it is human nature, the idea of conformity has grown hazy due to new ideas, expectations and acceptance from the new generation. The primary root of it adapts from people’s interpretations of “what if” rather than “what do I want,” which is an issue because the most important characteristic of a person has become not what others what, but what we ourselves want. Lately, even I, a teenager desperate for acceptance, have wondered what conformism truly means in this rapidly changing world, and why so many people fall ill to it.