Did Lizzie Borden Take an Axe
“Lizzie Borden took an axe and gave her father forty whacks. When she saw what she had done she gave her father forty-one.” This nursery rhyme is just one of the ways the murder of Andrew and Abby Borden has infiltrated popular culture. From movies, plays, and books to large national conferences, podcasts, and school papers, the murders have taken on a life of their own. Maybe one of the reasons is that despite the amount of time, money, and resources spent on the mystery, it remains that: a mystery. The perpetrators of the murders of Andrew and Abby can be summed by two theories: Lizzie Borden took an axe and that one of Andrew’s many enemies did the deed.
The famous who-done-it has intrigued millions for almost
…show more content…
In 1845, Andrew Borden married Sarah Morse who died in March of 1863 leaving two young daughters. Andrew remarried Abby Gray in 1865 with no objection from his two daughters, Lizzie and Emma. The two were civil with Abby in the beginning but as time went on, the openly quarreled with her and each other (Newton 25). This shows the degradation of their familial bond and their relationships in the days leading up to the couples untimely death. Later, on June 24, 1891, jewelry and money disappeared from the Borden house. Andrew and Abby thought that it was Lizzie who had been accused of shoplifting before. They made sure to lock all doors behind them after that (26). A week and a half later, on August 4, 1892, Andrew Borden came home from work around 10:30 AM for a nap. Lizzie greeted him at the door, as she usually did. Then, at 11:10 AM, Lizzie would call to …show more content…
At the time of their death, the family was not the most tight-knit group. Weeks before the fateful day, Lizzie and her sister, Emma, had found out of a plan to put a new farm in Abby’s name. The sisters saw this as a plot to rob them of their rightful inheritance (WASP Look). Then, in the days leading up to the murder, Andrew and Abby fell ill. Abby suspected poison and went to the doctor. Andrew, being the stingy man he was, reprimanded her for wasting money. A few days earlier, Lizzie was seen trying to buy a large amount of prussic acid, a known poison. She was denied access because of her lack of prescription (WASP Look). Without her having a lethal poison at her disposal, she may have experimented with less deadly poisons. Then, seeing her home-grade concoctions didn’t work, she graduated to a much quicker way of death, beating their heads in with a hatchet. Three days after the murder, Lizzie was seen burning a dress because she had gotten paint on it. Anyone who knew that family knew that they would never burn a dress because of a stain. It doesn’t help that the “paint” was the color of dried blood (Borden Took an Axe). Finally, at the trial, despite her many glaring contradictions in her testimony, she was declared innocent. One may ask why when she had such obvious motive and trouble keeping her story straight. The answer is sexism or chivalry as many would like to
Lizzie Borden is guilty of homicide of Andrew and Abby Borden because Lizzie’s investigations were never done correctly, Lizzie was doing peculiar things days before the murders, and Lizzie and her stepmother had bad blood. Lizzie Bordens investigation was never done correctly. Lizzie's room was never searched for any evidence. According to Bio.com, back then during
Further into the trial, there was a day dedicated strictly to the forensic discoveries. During this time Dr. Dolan, the examiner, was called to the stand to testify. The skulls of Abby and Andrew Borden accompanied Dr. Dolan and his testimony. He provided evidence that criminalized Lizzie, but that was not what the jury or media cared about. Specifically, the Author of the article “Dr. Dolan on the Stand”, wrote about the atmosphere in the courtroom that morning.
The Accused Lizzie Borden Lizzie Andrew Borden is suspected for the murder of her father and stepmother. In my opinion, she DID kill them. The 32-year-old had a motive, which would likely be gaining her father’s inheritance of money and property. She felt was owed to her, since she was his daughter.
For 4 hours, Lizzie gave very confused and contradictory answers to the questions that she answer. After 2 days later, Police Chief Hilliard arrested Lizzie Borden. The next day, Lizzie entered a plea of "Not Guilty" to the charges of murder and was transported by railcar to the jail in Taunton. In August 22, Lizzie returned to a Fall River courtroom for her preliminary hearing, at the end of which Judge Josiah Blaisdell pronounced her "probably guilty" and ordered her to face a grand jury and possible charges for the murder of her parents. The trial of Lizzie Borden opened in June 5, 1893 in the New Bedford Courthouse before a panel of three judges.
There are theories and speculations, but no real murder The murders of Andrew and Abby Borden still haven’t been uncovered. I personally think she is innocent. She is innocent because, she had no physical evidence against her in the trial , she loved her father deeply, and her father had an argument with a man just before that morning. These are the three reasons why I think Lizzie Borden is not the murderess of Mr. and Mrs. Borden. First, she had no real physical or forensic against her during the murder case.
How would you all react if you had just walked into the family room and you saw that your blood father had a big whole in his head and he was covered in blood. According to, ‘Lizzie Borden: Murderess or Media Sensation?,’ “Lizzie’s actions in the days after the murders also raised eyebrows: She gave contradictory answers to questions.” During the trial, Lizzie was medicated so heavily she most likely wasn’t totally aware so she couldn’t give the clearest answers. Most likely, she was very angry about the situation so she was not able to express all of her beliefs or describe the whole situation without telling all of her emotions. Even if people are a little mentally unstable, they don’t kill their parents, it would have to be somebody
Lizzie had possible motives that could’ve led to the killings. For instance, many have concluded Lizzie’s father could’ve been a possible rapist towards Lizzie. No evidence or proof was ever found to prove this statement. No one actually knows if Andrew Borden was a rapist or not, they based this statement on the room and door style. Next, Lizzie could’ve been angered at the actions of her dad.
They also found no footprints in the loft that could confirm Lizzie’s story. Though no forensic evidence was ever found to tie Lizzie to the crimes the clean, handle-free hatchet was found in the basement, which was the only reason it was suggested as a murder weapon. All they really had against her was her inconsistent stories, but there was no solid lead to tie her to the murders. She never testified, and like the prussic acid story, her earlier conflicting statements were judged inadmissible, partially because it was revealed she’d been on morphine, prescribed to calm her nerves, while giving them.
Also, Bridget and Lizzie killing Andrew and Abby Borden makes sense when they say that both had no emotions when they found the bodies but they were also angry with Andrew and Abby Borden. When Lizzie and Bridget found the bodies, Lizzie burned a white dress claim it was stained with red paint. She burned the dress in the kitchen, on the stove. However, Despite the rapidity of Herald News’s claim about how Lizzie Borden killed her parents they miss the mark when it comes to Bridget being there when the death of Andrew and Abby Borden because she was there when they were murdered. Bridget has been there for the family for a while.
When blood dries… it turns brown. For sure this sounds a little queasy that she would burn the dress with brown stains on them and not throw it away. As can be seen she for sure wanted all evidence to be permanently gone. Another example of evidence about Lizzie being guilty is two days prior to the murder she was found buying prussic acid (Gustafson, [45]). If you are not familiar in what that is, it is a deadly poison.
A family friend of the Borden’s, Alice Russell, who went to Borden’s house to live with Lizzie and Emma a couple of days after the murder (Johnson 1: 165). Alice testified that Lizzie visited her the day before the murders, and told her that she thinks something terrible was going to take place with her parents (Hartselle and Myers paragraph 10; Johnson 1:165). When Lizzie talked to Alice, which shows that she knew that her parents were going to be murdered. But, she was pretending to be worried for them to mislead people for any possible doubt on her after the murders. Alice Russell also mentioned that a few days after the murders, “Lizzie burned the blue dress in front of her and Lizzie told…
I read through all the witness testimonies and Lizzie Borden is guilty let me tell you why. All these testimonies mentioned something that made her look guilty. here’s why, she changed the story way too much, Lizzie Borden burned a really big piece of evidence, she also could have been jealous of her stepmother because her father bought her stepmother Abby Borden a house. Lizzie Borden seems to change her answers a lot in the very last document. Let me explain to you why she is guilty.
In Fall River a girl that goes by Lizzie Borden killed her parents out of anger and rage. This was a planned murder due to family friction and the relationship in the family. It seems apparent that Lizzie Borden killed her parents due to a bad relationship and friction between the three. Lizzie Borden killed her parents over a fit of range and an insecure mindset to be thinking. For example, she had a bad home life and relationship with her family members.
Ultimately, the answer to that question is unknown, and we can only speculate based on the evidence that is available. However, it is clear that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to secure a conviction, and Lizzie was ultimately acquitted of the murders. Despite this, many people continue to believe that Lizzie was guilty of the crimes. Some theories suggest that she may have used a poison or other method to kill her parents, while others argue that she may have had an accomplice who helped her commit the murders. However, without any concrete evidence, these theories remain nothing more than
There were lots of loose ends and unsolved questions. I am here to convince you that Lizzie did not do it and, that she is innocent. Firstly, imagine being accused of killing your parents. How would that make you feel?