“Lizzie Borden took an ax, and gave her mother forty whacks when she saw what she had done, She gave her father forty-one” the infamous song of Lizzie Borden allegedly accused of both the murders of her father and stepmother. But now come to think could she really have been innocent? There are many suspicious details leading to her being guilty but Lizzie was declared innocent. So now the suspicion begins. Despite the many information on the Lizzie Borden case, I believe Lizzie Borden should have been proven guilty. She had tried and unsuccessfully attempted to purchase prussic acid a highly poisonous liquid. Police found no sign of forced entries and from the evidence, Lizzie was the only person in the house during the murder of her stepmother …show more content…
August 3, 1892 a day before the murders of Andrew and Abby Borden Lizzie was witnessed an attempt to purchase prussic acid. How casual that it had been the day before. Article 1 claims, “They did however, establish that Lizzie had unsuccessfully attempted to purchase prussic acid, a highly poisonous liquid, in the day before the murders.” This shows much evidence contradicting against her. Not many people would casually go and buy such a high poisonous acid. But then again come to realize her timing on the situation. This puts suspicion on her side towards the fact of it being attempted to be bought the night before the unfortunate murders. So that is one of the many evidence that has been held against Lizzie Borden as she should have been proven guilty not …show more content…
Being downstairs during the time of the murder of her stepmother how was no noise heard. Coming to the conclusion Abby was upstairs in the guest room where she was whacked in the head 18 times by what many believe the murder weapon was a hatchet or ax. Yet Lizzie heard nothing. Article 3 claims, “Only Lizzie was known to be in the house at the time of Abby Borden’s murder.” Having Lizzie be the only one in the house during the murder of her stepmother it’s hard to believe she heard no noise. From when Abby had fallen to the floor, the wackes taken to the head and other noises that could have occurred throughout the death. Article 3 also states, “Lizzie claimed to have been in the loft of the backyard barn for 15 to 20 minutes looking for lead sinkers for a fishing excursion. Police found the loft so stiflingly hot that it was difficult to believe anyone would voluntarily remain in such a place for as much as 20 minutes.” Though police officers claimed it was too hot for a woman to stand to be in there for 15 to 20 minutes as she claimed. Then it’s not very convincing that she could have been in the loft looking for lead sinkers. Though this may be one of the few it says much about her actions throughout the day of the
During the 20th century, this was not an outrageous claim. Women would tend to their menstrual cycle by using cloths as protection. Yet, the only reason why this evidence was removed from the court and the trial was because she was a woman. Had a man who lived with women sat in Lizzie’s position, the idea most likely would never be discussed. The dismissal of the provided evidence furthered the pity Lizzie received from the media and public alike.
The Accused Lizzie Borden Lizzie Andrew Borden is suspected for the murder of her father and stepmother. In my opinion, she DID kill them. The 32-year-old had a motive, which would likely be gaining her father’s inheritance of money and property. She felt was owed to her, since she was his daughter.
Not only she refuse to provide her testimony, she faint during the hearing when the skull of Abby Borden and Andrew Borden are reveal accidently by a defendant (The Lizzie Borden Trial). Furthermore, in the court stood 12 male judges and juries who though Lizzie as like their own daughter (Lizzie Borden A Woman Accused Documentary). On the day before the court hearing, she was told to change her style of clothing, and to appeal femme to in front of court (Lizzie Borden A Woman Accused Documentary). The trial of Lizzie Borden lasted for 18 days, and it took one hour for the judge and jury to acquit Lizzie Borden. The judges did not question the suspicious of her response to the interview or
How would you all react if you had just walked into the family room and you saw that your blood father had a big whole in his head and he was covered in blood. According to, ‘Lizzie Borden: Murderess or Media Sensation?,’ “Lizzie’s actions in the days after the murders also raised eyebrows: She gave contradictory answers to questions.” During the trial, Lizzie was medicated so heavily she most likely wasn’t totally aware so she couldn’t give the clearest answers. Most likely, she was very angry about the situation so she was not able to express all of her beliefs or describe the whole situation without telling all of her emotions. Even if people are a little mentally unstable, they don’t kill their parents, it would have to be somebody
Lizzie is not guilty, and I know this from the several testimonies that i read over. Some of the testimonies prove to themselves about how she is innocent. The small testimonies mostly I see that there is more evidence, the bigger testimonies like Emma Borden’s I believe does not show as much with Lizzie. All of the hidden evidence of Lizzie’s case is not mentioned enough, they grab all the evidence that can be possibly useless and focus on it more.
I read through all the witness testimonies and Lizzie Borden is guilty let me tell you why. All these testimonies mentioned something that made her look guilty. here’s why, she changed the story way too much, Lizzie Borden burned a really big piece of evidence, she also could have been jealous of her stepmother because her father bought her stepmother Abby Borden a house. Lizzie Borden seems to change her answers a lot in the very last document. Let me explain to you why she is guilty.
Even though it is unexpected, there is a ton of evidence that goes against Lizzie Borden. First of all, when the incident happened, Lizzie provided an alibi that was unreliable and inconsistent. However, everyone else in her family was
Police and investigators believed that Lizzie Borden was the murderer because of the fact
[Posessing] the motive and the murder weapon to commit homicide Elizabeth was justly convicted. On the other hand, there were no witnesses to deny Lindy Chamberlain’s story, and when she was taken in for questioning, investigators reported that she possessed no motives to kill. [Since] Lindy, however, held no evident motive to kill her own, she was deemed innocent. Though it was unknown at the time, dingoes like mothers can
Why She Is Guilty “My door was open part of the time, and part of the time I tried to get a nap and their voices annoyed me, and I closed it. I kept it open in summer more or less, and closed in winter.” Lizzie Borden stated after the murder.(BrainyQuotes.com) The people who seem innocent are the real guilty ones. Some of them try to hide behind their shyness or the motive.
Held in New Bedford, Massachusetts, the trial of Lizzie Borden contained many suspicious, unusual, and debatable reactions and pieces of evidence, causing the jury to decide on an unlikely verdict of not guilty (Berni 34). From the start, Lizzie Borden provided many inconsistent facts about the murders (Hazell). One example of Lizzie Borden’s changing story relates to the note her stepmother allegedly received prior to her murder. When asked for proof of the letter, Lizzie concluded that she had disposed of it. Ms. Borden’s suspicious stories also included the burning of a dress “stained by paint” and the eating of pears in a barn outside the home on the hottest summer day (Stuart).
Three days after the murder, Lizzie was seen burning a dress because she had gotten paint on it. Anyone who knew that family knew that they would never burn a dress because of a stain. It doesn’t help that the “paint” was the color of dried blood (Borden Took an Axe). Finally, at the trial, despite her many glaring contradictions in her testimony, she was declared innocent. One may ask why when she had such obvious motive and trouble keeping her story straight.
She couldn’t be in the barn because Bridget Sullivan would have seen her whilst running between the windows and the barn to refill her pail. The same goes for if Lizzie was outside. All of theses defenses that seem to have all happened at the same time are proof that Lizzie is guilty for murdering her parents. Even if they were made up due to Morphine, the very first one she gave, being in the barn getting a piece of iron was definitely a white lie, because neighbors and the maid have seen
Lizzie Borden took an ax, And gave her mother forty whacks; When she saw what she had done, She gave her father forty-one. The famous rhyme of Lizzie Borden giving her mother 40 whacks and then her father 41. Most people assume she committed the crime, of killing her parents, and that she planned the whole thing though there are some holes in the case. Everybody thinks she committed the crime though no one is sure, one thing is certain there are holes in the case and these holes make me believe that Lizzie did not do the crime. There are so many holes that no one is certain who did the crime.
For the duration of her trial Lizzie Borden was seen as a bane, a murderer, and would be treated like one for the rest of her life. Sarah Miller recognized the wrong in this and aspired to give Lizzie another chance to clear her name by giving nothing but the facts about the case since, during her trial, evidence was left out or overlooked. In her book “The Borden Murders: Lizzie Borden and the