(MIP) There is 2 choices you can make while driving, one choice is driving fast and killing a person or animal, or other driving slow and getting arrested. (SIP-A) One choice you have while driving is driving fast and killing people or animals. (STEWE-1) Clarisse and Montag were having a conversation about people hurting themselves and each other nowadays. “Six of my friends have been shot in the last year alone. Ten of them died in car wrecks”(27). Clarisse's friends have died in car wrecks because people don't pay attention because they are driving so fast. Even when one of her friends are walking to or home from school, or anywhere, or even driving too fast or too slow, they have died because people around them are not paying attention to …show more content…
(SIP-A) I choose to use the logical fallacy, either/or; also called false dilemma. (STEWE-1) The logical fallacy either/or;also called false dilemma is when only two options are given when many choices exist. Also, a false Dilemma is a fallacy based on an "either-or" type of argument. I choose this logical fallacy because in the book “Fahrenheit 451, By Ray Bradbury”, the society doesn't allow people to think about the world around them by making then drive fast. (STEWE-2) There is two choices you can choose from, you can either follow societies rule, and drive fast and not be able to think about the world around them and think, or you can drive slow and get arrested, like Clarisse's uncle, and be able to think about the world around you. (SIP-B) Both pathos and logos are used in my meme. (STEWE-1) Pathos is a politician attempts to instill fear, anxiety, trust, hope, optimism, pessimism or any other positive or negative feeling in people. In my meme pathos is used by trying to get an emotional feeling across to the reader. It is also trying to get a positive (not killing a person or animal), and a negative (killing a person or animal) feeling across to the reader. (STEWE-2) Logos consists of evidence and arguments. Logos is used in my meme because my whole meme is basically an argument. There's 2 sides that people believe in. They are, driving fast and killing a person or animal, or driving slow and getting arrested. (CS) The logical fallacy either/or; also called false dilemma, and pathos and logos are all used in my meme to get the message across to the reader to do the right
Society chooses to believe a fake reality rather than facing the real problems going on. This false reality prevents society from being aware of the government's choices and intentions. The story Fahrenheit 451 is a perfect example of this because in the story it portrays the loss of human connection, censorship, and emotion. For example, in the story Montag loved his wife Millie but, after she was gone he realized he did not love her, even though they were married for ten years. In the society Montag lives in, everyone is “happy” and no one ever knows why they, they just know it is the right thing.
Logos is the appeal to the audience’s logic or thinking of constructing a well-reasoned argument. It includes: facts, research, and statistics. For instance, "And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Have we anything new to offer on the subject?
(MIP-1) This meme showcases a central theme from the novel; the fact that books are feared and most of the people and government perceive books as horrible, evil things. (SIP-1) This meme shows one of the reasons that books are feared, because they make people actually have feelings. (STEWE-1)
1. Summary: In this section of Fahrenheit 451, many interesting things happened. Montag kept bringing up Clarisse and what made her special. Mildred did not want to talk about Clarisse because she was dead and wanted to talk about someone who was alive. Montag wanted to learn why he was reading books and the purpose of them.
“There are too many of us... There are billions of us and that’s too many. Nobody knows anyone” (pg. 14). After Mildred tries to commit suicide, Montag begins to question his life. Even though the world is overpopulated, the government won't let anyone die, even if they choose to.
In a future totalitarian society, all books have been outlawed by the government, fearing an independent-thinking public. Fahrenheit 451 is a futuristic novel, telling the story of a time where books and independent thinking are outlawed. In a time so unenlightened, where those who want to better themselves by thinking, are outlawed and killed. Guy Montag is a senior firefighter who is much respected by his superiors and is in line for a promotion. He does not question what he does or why he does it until he meets Clarisse.
A. The word that describes the first third of Fahrenheit 451 is ‘fear’. The people in this society are afraid of the government, and the government is afraid of the people. In an attempt to stay in power, the government banned free thought – à la mode of Syria, Libya, the USSR and other countries. Because books bring intellectualism, books are thus banned and replaced with mass media.
Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United States claims, “We are as happy as we make our minds to be”. In Ray Bradbury’s science fiction novel, Fahrenheit 451, Mildred and Montag, a married couple live in a technologically advanced society where books along with any other items or activities that provoke thought are not allowed. Drowning in technology, the society absorbs in distractions such as television and earbuds that isolate themselves. Though Mildred claims she lives her life satisfied, she proves she rejects her unhappiness by escaping society with meaningless relationships, drowning in technology, and attempting to commit suicide.
“Don’t judge a book by its cover” (Bradbury 155). This is a traditional quote that is most relevant to a story and modern day society. In the beginning, Montag would burn books with much pleasure believing that books are considered “evil,” but later on in the novel he confronts Clarisse. Faber, and Granger whom guided Montag to realize how wonderful a book can be, how much meaning and depth they have to improve one’s life, and how they can make one feel “reborn.” Ray Bradbury’s compelling novel, Fahrenheit 451, tells the story of a fireman, Montag, whom is trying to seek happiness, and freedom by thinking that books function as a human being that can help him solve the problem he is currently facing.
In a society where the people don’t care and talk to each other, but spend time surrounded by TVs, we can see how they get pleasure from burning books and killing each other. In Fahrenheit 451, we see the writer Ray Bradbury criticizes the ignorant and corrupted society. He criticizes the society through the lack of communication, the lack of knowledge and the violence. Firstly, we can see how the people in this corrupted society stay away from and hardly communicate with each other.
The captivating glow, the trustworthy warmth, it is simple to fall victim to common belief in fire. So many people today are swept away with society’s general thoughts. These individuals want to fit in, so they do not attempt to break away from common belief. Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 shows this social conformity through technology, lack of thought, and characters.
Annotated Works Cited Eller, Edward E. " An overview of Fahrenheit 451. " Literature Resource Center. Detroit: Gale, 2014.
Montag sat by the blazing fire, filling every bone in his body with warmth, the same fire that he ran away from. He watched as the red and orange tails of the fire flickered upward, sending a smoke rising high above the clouds. The same fire, in which helped Montag destroy books, homes and much more, was now consoling him. He furrowed his brows, attempting to connect the book of Ecclesiastes to himself, as he did not understand how the intellectuals became a book, when a hard hand came down upon his shoulder. “Well aren’t you as scared as a bunny in a foxhole!”
Which road will the speaker take? This question sets the literal and metaphorical divergence in the woods that the speaker will have to face: both an actual path through the woods and the life decisions implied by it. The first extended metaphor of choice happens in these line: the chosen path is the chosen life choices. The speaker will have to choose a road to go down and one not to, presenting the first conflict of choice. He is faced with two different roads that each lead to a different outcome.
‘Stopping By Woods on a Snowy Evening,’ ‘Birches,’ and ‘Mowing’” (Rukhaya). The woods can also dually represent self-reliance and nonconformity. By acknowledging his choice in the woods alone, the traveler shows that he is willing to “oppose social norms” (Rukhaya) and rely on his own instinct to come to a decision. As an extended metaphor for choice, it makes sense that the roads represent the journey of life and decision. There are two roads, two choices, and two representations of decision.