Overlooked and often forgotten, wilderness is surrounding the envionments humans live in. Wilderness does not have to be a untarnished and completely protected. Just as families have a place to call home, wilderness provides a home and a place of refuge for animals and plants and other non human living organizims. They make up the balance needed to sustance the wilderness. How humans and wilderness intact is what will cause florecment or produce neglect. Neglect will lead to long term negative consequences that would impact both humans and the wilderness. On the surface in most wilderness areas in may seem that life in the wilderness in well and with continues protection will go on. Although, an area of wilderness has been forgotten and is being abused. Thoughforgotten that wilderness needs a home just has much has humans. This envasion happens every summer up and down …show more content…
One gum wrapper may not significantly harm a habitat, but with the amount of visitors beaches have those gum wrappers pile up. It is not just wrappers. There are lost shovels, forgotten water bottles, left behind towels and shoes. And even if you had volenteers who truly understood the imporatnce of taking acre of this enviornment, it would be a battle that would be non stop. The problems do not stop here. Research has shown that sunscreen is having a negeative impact on the health of coral reefs. Trash is dumped and left on beaches daily. Oil spills and boat use disrupt fish and marine life. Erosion has become a big consern for the stability of beaches. Without people realizing the need to take resposibility and take a moment to leave no trace, the place called the perfect vacation spot will lose it 's significance and true purpose. solutions: limits to amount of houses on coast and how close they can be: every certain milage have beach that cannot be traspassed upon and is managed to protect the animal life and plant
In his essay, “First Wilderness: America’s Wonderland and Indian Removal from Yellowstone National Park,” Mark David Spence argues that the creation of Yellowstone National Park is an early illustration of removing native peoples as a way to “preserve” nature. The idea of Yellowstone being a pristine and untouched wilderness, is challenged by Spence as he brings to light the presence of Indigenous peoples and communities who had occupied the land prior to the national park being established. He advocates for a better understanding of Yellowstone National Park’s history, encompassing the dispossession of the Indigenous peoples within the area. Spence explains how the wilderness preservation of Yellowstone ignores and dismisses any connection
I disagree with Cronon’s notion that people’s idea of wilderness was historically powerful. Undoubtedly, the wilderness notion played a role in forming American identity. Cronon states the consequences of this role when he writes “Thus in the myth of the vanishing for if wild land had been so crucial in the making of the nation,”(Pg 76). But these consequences aren’t particularly profound. Even though the wilderness notion resulted in establishing national parks and preservations, it did not prevent the further development of industry, consumption of forests and mining of natural resources.
The algae washes up on shores and destroy the beautiful of the beaches. This also has a side effect on the economy. A nuclear power plant had to be shut down from the algae problem which has cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars per day.
I disagree with Cronon’s notion that people’s idea of wilderness was historically powerful. Undoubtedly, the wilderness notion played a role in forming American identity. Cronon states the consequences of this role when he writes “Thus in the myth of the vanishing frontier lay the seeds of wilderness preservation in the United States, for if wild land had been so crucial in the making of the nation”(Pg 76). But these consequences aren’t particularly profound. Even though the wilderness notion resulted in establishing national parks and preservations, it did not prevent the further development of industry, consumption of forests and mining of natural resources.
Zombies love to eat human brains. Know how to survive while being in a zombie apocalypse. “Expert Advice: 9 Essentials for Wilderness Survival” by Suzie Hockmeyer and “Survival Essentials: What matters Most” by Filip Tkaczyk, outline what is needed for survival outside of normal life. These skills could be applied to a Zombie Apocalypse. In order to survive a Zombie Apocalypse one may need a food, a knife, and a first aid kit.
Cormac McCarthy’s All the Pretty Horses, written in 1992, depicts the concept of the “new west” verses the “old west” in a coming-of-age story centering on the protagonist, John Grady. McCarthy’s rough, plain, yet captivating style of writing romanticizes western landscape. The landscape, which is vividly described, is for the most part, glorified, and raises the question: is the west purely an idealized conception? The western landscape in All the Pretty Horses is romanticized and this is significant because the themes of isolation, nostalgia, and freedom are viewed pastorally as well.
Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac proposes different perspectives on human interactions with the environment. The known father of wildlife conservation, Aldo Leopold, articulates an unprecedented idea called “land ethic” which upholds the right of the soils, waters, animals, and plants to a life in a natural state. The book itself is a series of discrete essays as Leopold seeks the ecology of his farm in the sand country of Wisconsin, a poor part of the country with infertile soil. In short pieces, he writes of each month of the year, talking of hunting, fishing, watching wildlife, understanding the land, migrating birds, and trees. The finishing pieces consist of excellent essays about different parts of the country, the wilderness ethic,
Surviving the wilderness is no easy task, especially when a wig maker is left with no choice but to construct a cabin that can withstand months of bitter winter. back in the years of 1607 to 1611 several English colonists had settled along the Chesapeake coast of the North American continent and inaugurated numerous bastions that beleaguer one settlement, called Jamestown, Virginia. These settlers, mostly poor, had hoped of the land to bring great influence into the lives of themselves and their families, such as debt abatement, land ownership, or even the spread of Jesus Christ. Despite their hopes, the settles in turn faced adversity in order to reach their dream, which by 1611, arrived at an 80% death rate in Jamestown. There were some reasons
The American preservationist movement is arguably the oldest and longest running movement in America. Although wilderness was the bane to the existence of early settlers, it quickly became an important cornerstone of American culture, even as its vast expanses began to dwindle and become unreachable to every day Americans. American was carved by hand by hard working frontiersmen out of rough cut untouched forest making wilderness the foundation of American culture. Though historically, the only natural things man had a tolerance for were those that served his needs, good lumber, tame animals with meat milk or wool, and soil easy to plow. But through a drastic shift in public view in around the turn of the 19th century, suddenly America broke thousands of years of western cultural precedent when it declared that untouched wilderness deserved to be preserved and protected.
Mountains Made Alive: Native American Relationships with Sacred Land is an analytical article written by Emily Cousins. As the title suggests, the article discusses the relationship between Native Americans and the land, but it also delves into the relationship that non-Native Americans have with the land. The article begins with a story that is essentially about an American woman who camped on a sacred land for superficial reasons. She didn’t fully understand the significance of the spot she had chosen until she spoke to her Native American friend. The article continues to point out that non-Natives view the land simply as property, while Native Americans view the land as a living, breathing counterpart.
Cronon does not have a problem with protecting wild places; he has a problem with the way that we use this place as modern society. Instead of viewing wilderness as remote and massive, we need to focus on the wilderness and nature as our own backyard. Our current idea of wilderness “teaches us to be dismissive, or even contemptuous of such humble places and experiences.” (Cronon Pg 23) There is nothing different between the backyard tree, a mountaintop and the tree next door except the way we look at them.
Do we as humans have any right to lay claim to land that has been the home of other animals for centuries? In Rena Korb’s critical essay on “The Interlopers,” she argues that land ownership is just an illusion, and the wilderness is a cold place in which only the strongest are fit to survive. Written in 2002 in Detroit, Michigan, Korb’s critical essay was published in the magazine Short Stories for Students. The essay provides an illuminating analysis on the role of the wolves in the story, as well as additional insight into what exactly the author was trying to convey through his story. I chose this essay for my rhetorical analysis because Rena Korb provided a unique perspective on Saki’s short story “The Interlopers” by focusing on the wolves
Due to beach erosion, the beach becomes lower in elevation with less land and a retreat if the shoreline. Beach Erosion affects all aspects of life amongst the people and wildlife of the Southern Shore of Long Island, it especially affects those who rely on the
It is only in hindsight that many tourists regret their decisions in vacationing to these Southern California “paradise” beaches. Although the Southern California beaches are more well-known, they are also the most populous. Southern California beaches often times frequented by turbulent college students from
Angela, Your post was very informative. I would have never thought that just by wearing sunscreen and going to the beach it would lead to the destruction of coral reefs! I will keep that in mind the next time I go to the beach. In addition, would you have any suggestions for substitutes that may not have such a harmful effect on the environment? Also, for those who have sensitive skin but love the beach, would you think that their tradeoff for personal pleasure is greater than the preservation of coral reefs?