This paper summarizes the article, “A Longitudinal Naturalistic Study of Patients With Dissociative Disorders Treated by Community Clinicians” (Brand, McNary, Classen, Loewenstein, Myrick, Lanius & Pain, et al., 2009). Reviewing this article revealed DID presents numerous challenges for the practitioners who perform assessments for a clinical diagnosis. Most Professionals approach this disorder with caution because of it's interrelated problems, as well as the on going controversies surrounding DID. So, in order for this study to work effectively, there would need to be a wide variety of people who deal with this disorder. Patients would include people from different countries all ethnic back grounds, and a large scale of psychological doctors. …show more content…
Between the time span of the study of diverse patients, the naturalistic study sees how well the patients function in society. It involves observing participants in their natural environment. This kind of research is often used in situations, conducting laboratory research because it is cost prohibitive, impractical, or would immensely impact the participant's behavior. The reason why this research is necessary is because there has not been a lot of research on what treatment is most effective for this disorder. Therapists and patients in a community were recruited for the existing …show more content…
However, researchers measured how frequent the patients displayed positive behavior throughout the study. As time went on they didn't see the effect they wanted when using "statistical programming environment R,"(304) so they started a new method called "PITQ,"(303) which was specifically designed for DID, it showed remarkable data improvements. The results and implication of that were measured were going out into society, doing constructive stuff, and continuing with therapy, or whether they were hospitalized or not. The odds of hospitalization were reduced each month and the likelihood of participating in social activities increased. Moreover, additional patients reported that there was a notable decrease of self-harm in the thirty-day time frame. The authors discovered that treatment done on patients with DD through the “naturalistic observational”(301) study was associated with the improvement of
The client presented in this paper is Truddi Chase, the author of the novel When Rabbit Howls. Truddi was a survivor of severe sexual, emotional, and physical abuse at the hands of her mother and step-father (Chase, 1987). Truddi suffered daily horrors that triggered her to ‘split’ into different personalities that helped her compartmentalize her trauma and face daily life (Chase, 1987). It was not until she sought therapy in her forties that she was diagnosed with dissociative identify disorder (Chase, 1987). Truddi refused to integrate her personalities, choosing instead to tackle life as a team dubbed ‘the Troops’, and by her death she had discovered 92 separate personalities (Chase, 1987).
DSM I and II were not cared about much in society, but DSM III saved psychiatry. It had both positive and negative effects. It created a reliance on empathy and creative intuition to understand patient’s issues. It also created a system for diagnosis and
Famed psychologist, Sigmund Freud, is perhaps one of the most iconic and influential figures in the sphere of faulty scientific reasoning to date. Though his theories and ideas remain to be integral parts of psychological culture, a large number of them have been wildly disproven by modern scientists, who cite Freud’s misuse of evidence (more specifically, case studies) as a contributing factor to the erroneousness of his claims. Case study, Freud’s preferred method of investigation, extensively examines a single group, person, etc. As a result of this, one cannot use a case study as a dependable source of information, nor can one generalize a case study to a broader population, despite Freud’s multiple attempts to do just that, in a variety of studies dealing with mentally-ill patients. It is outdated and unreliable; a source of evidence that is of little to no scientific value, yet, one that still endures to be staple among discredited scientists and groundless researchers alike.
Furthermore, it was very beneficial for the researchers to evaluate the LHSV as the method to gather the required information. The survey consisted of twelve questions that were descriptive and direct; which, offered “Yes” or “No” answers and multiple choice questions (option of three responses). I feel the design of the survey was carefully created to help the veterans fully understand the questions and answer them to the best of their ability. Although I admired these dynamics in the study, the external validity I feel was below average. Since this was one of the first studies to compare health behaviors with mental illness among the veterans, the study is based on one type of population; which, results do not represent the entire community of individuals that have BPD.
This study will be correlational and longitudinal. Selecting a correlational and longitudinal design will allow us to collect a large sample, representative of the population, ensuring the external validity of the research. Research findings will provide valuable insights and open up avenues of further research on maternal religiosity and children/adolescents at risk of depression. In addition, correlational and longitudinal design will allow determining the strength and direction of the relationship between variables, which can be used in future research as a starting point and, if possible, determining causation experimentally. One limitation of conducting longitudinal study is that it can be time consuming.
This study really supported the idea that is a home based program is a great option and the clinical impact really supported the idea. It allowed the participants flexibility and they could also practice in their own judgment free zone which is really important in
Dialectical behavior therapy is a comprehensive treatment combining “individual psychotherapy, group skills training, telephone coaching, and a therapist consultation team” (Lineham & Wilks, 2015) which was originally developed by Dr. Marsha Linehan for clients who were highly suicidal. Based on empirical studies, this paper will review the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy treatment within various disorders; borderline personality disorder and suicidal and self-harming behaviors, posttraumatic stress disorder, eating disorders, as well as a brief study of using dialectical behavior therapy to treat adolescents with substance use disorder. Review of Empirical Studies Borderline Personality Disorder The majority of available research
Case Conceptualization Nathaniel decided to seek outpatient psychotherapy because of his concerns regarding hearing voices, distress, and sadness. Symptoms onset was identified when he was thirteen-years-old before Nathaniel entered high school. Nathaniel and his family have noticed something was
1. Which methods of research are appropriate for the study of different behaviors? There are multiple methods of research in psychology. But two that are most appropriate to study behavior is naturalistic observation and longitudinal studies. Naturalistic behavior is a research method in which psychologist study and observe the subject in a normal environment without interfering with the subject.
Other specified dissociative disorders, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorders, PTSD, psychotic disorders, substance/medication-induced disorder, personality disorder, conversion disorder (function neurological symptoms disorder), seizure disorder, and Factitious disorder and malingering. Aaron Stampler could not be diagnose with any of these differential diagnosis because dissociative Identity disorder is the only disorder in the DSM-5 where we see disruption of identity characterized by two or more distinct personality states. (American Psychiatric Association & American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p.
In some cases two out of these personalities are often in charge of the individual’s behavior, mind, and body causing short and long period of memory loss. The American Psychiatric Association also relates to dissociative disorder to anxiety, suicidal, and depression. The most at risk individuals from developing any form of dissociative disorder are individuals that had suffered trauma in their life specially child abuse or any other type of child trauma. In the movie “Split” Kevin Wendell Crumbs displayed the extreme behavior for a person diagnosed with multiple
Dissociative Identity Disorder Dissociative Identity Disorder is a diagnosis first featured in the DSM IV in 1994. Prior to this, the disorder was referred to as multiple personality disorder. According to Michelson & Ray, dissociation is a human experience that dates back to prehistoric times with the shaman peoples and appears to be a “fundamental and universal component of human psychology” (History, para. 1). It is important to recognize that dissociation is normal to an extent. “The first case of multiple personality disorder, now known as dissociative identity disorder (DID), was described by Paracelsus in 1646”
The authors’ understood the importance of facts and provide over 100 years background history. Instability, intense interpersonal relationships, anger and paranoia are among some of the common patterns portrayed by those with BPD (4). Another example, “[O]bservations are the result of a career of seeing sufferers…” emphasizes the authors’ use authority providing formidable substance to the
DISCUSSION From the beginning, the therapist had to deal with own doubts and anxiety. The therapist had heard a lot about the psychodynamic psychotherapy but this was the first time he conduct the sessions by himself. Unlike pharmacotherapy, there is no standard clinical practice guideline or recommendation for the therapist to refer to or follow. The therapist was worried that he was unable to conduct the therapy effectively and his patient would not benefit from the therapy.
Having the questionnaire of the perspective of the patients is needed. The questionnaire gives people the chance to talk about their experiences resulting from the therapy. It gives prospective patients a chance to gain knowledge about someone that has experienced the therapy. Future patients have to keep in mind that everyone is different so therefore results will vary. The therapy did work for some people.