Camren Smith Ms. Secker May 1, 2023 Style Analysis Essay Revision In the passage from chapter 9 of Lord of the Flies, Golding uses detail and figurative language to illustrate the growth of savage behavior demonstrated by the boys, just moments before Simon’s death. First, Golding uses detail in order to portray the boy’s growing savagery before the shocking and brutal moments of Simon’s death. In this passage, Golding had set an eerie mood by the addition of an intimidating storm and the reactions of the boys: “A wave of restlessness set the boys swaying and moving aim-lessly”. By using the words restlessness and aim-lessly, Golding suggests that the boys were anxious and unable to remain still. This was in response to a wave of madness brought by the storm. The diction Golding uses helps …show more content…
Conclusively, this allows the reader to better understand the tension building up in the air, as well as the growing savagery of the boys and the events leading up to the brutal moments of Simon’s death. Furthermore, the detail Golding utilizes portrays the message that the moments leading up to Simon’s death grew more and more savage. Throughout the storm, the boys had become so wild it had driven them mad. Just moments before their interactions with the beast, they had become so reckless they could no longer contain themselves. Detail was expressed when Golding said that the boys were very eager to participate in the horrific events before Simon’s death: “...Under the threat of the sky, [they] found themselves eager to take a place in this demented…society”. To behave wildly and irrationally on account of anger, distress, or excitement is what it means to be demeted. The detail that is used to portray the growth of savage behavior leading up to the moments before Simon’s death, gives the reader a better understanding by building this crazed outlook on the society and mindset the boys have created for
Simon is explaining how he thinks that the boys are becoming more eivil no whats around them and at this part of the book simon started to disappear more. Showing simon was holding them toghter. When they killed simon they weren’t even phased showing they didn’t care anymore and are becoming more evil. “Comming in the dark-he had no bissness crawling like that out of thr dark.
On page 154 of Lord of the Flies, as the body of the supposed ‘beast’ is revealed to be Simon, the collapse of the boys’ innocence and civilization is conveyed through William Golding’s carefully selected words. Right after an especially violent scene, in which the boys become the most violent they have been throughout the whole novel, Golding makes a drastic transition to a scene that is described beautifully and calmly. This moment of peace and tranquility, despite the immensely devastating incident of Simon’s death, makes for heavy contrast with the rest of the chapter, as well as the rest of the novel. Details in the form of words that are typically associated with a positive connotation, such as “pearls”, “clearness”, “smoothed”,
To elaborate on motif, there is a chant that keeps repeating among the group of little boys “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!” (Golding 152). In this excerpt from the book the boys chant leads up to Simon a side characters death.
Simon’s role in Lord of the Flies is to resemble a Christ-like figure, when he eventually dies, the buried savagery in the boys is revealed. Simon is killed in a gruesome matter, which at the time the boys had “leapt on to beast, screamed, bit, struck, tore” (Golding 153). A group of children had decided to take it upon themselves to have a wonderful time tearing up another boy in the name of fun. The way in which the boys had killed Simon shows that they did not care whether or not they had weapons, the group had shown no mercy to the exhausted Simon. After Simon’s demise, two of the most innocent boys have a conversation of the previous night, that “‘It was an accident…
As the fire began to spread faster and faster, causing the island to burn, it is noted that “One patch [of flames] touched a tree trunk and scrambled up like a bright squirrel,” (44). Golding uses the simile of “scrambl[ing] up like a bright squirrel” to demonstrate how quickly the fire was spreading. The words “bright squirrel” serve to further emphasize how intense the fire is. Because the fire is moving so quickly, it would be hard for young boys to put it out on their own. By making this point, Golding is saying that the boys are unable to handle such chaos on their own, and need the help of adults to
In the allegory Lord of the Flies, author William Golding employs a pure and innocent young boy, Simon, as an allusion and symbol of Jesus Christ to substantially convey the message that innocence, mortality, and truth are devoured at the hands of humankind’s innate savagery and evil. Freed from the constraints of society and civilization, the boys relish in their freedom in the isolated tropical island and eventually descend into instinctual madness and sin, the lines between democracy and anarchy blurring. Determined to save his friends,
The beast was on its knees in the center, its arms folded over its face. It was crying out against the abominable noise something about a body on the hill. The beast struggled forward, broke the ring and fell over the steep edge of the rock to the sand by the water. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (152) demonstrates that the fear of the beast controlled the boys, and influenced them to kill Simon.
In life kids are known to be naive and innocent to the ways of the world. They think everything is fun and games up until they experience a phenomenon that makes them grow up. At times those experiences can be traumatizing and extremely tense. In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the main character Ralph experiences first hand what a human with a dark heart can do. William Golding uses diction, imagery and detail to set an intense tone for the story.
William Golding's Lord of the Flies is an interesting work of ideas abundant with meaningful symbolism and affirmations that coincide with the thinking of multiple theorists; however, the novel best illustrates the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes. As Hobbes believes, humans will become increasingly disobedient and violent with the absence of laws (Hobbes). Eventually, they will become entirely combative and chaotic. It is through the boys' actions and behaviors that the validity of Hobbes' thoughts are proven: the spiral of one into full ruthlessness is inevitable as soon as a system of law and order has been removed. Golding's portrayal of Jack Merridew's increasing hostility and belligerence as the story progresses exemplifies Hobbes's thoughts
Then, once the beast is brought up, Jack humiliates Simon for his belief that there is no beast. This is because if Simon sways the other boys to his side, savageness will lose control, a partial reason for why Jack killed Simon. Jack gathered all of the boys together, riled them up, and caused them to have a savage mindset. As a result, when Simon runs out of the woods to tell the boys about his discovery, the boys are unable to control themselves, and Simon is an unfortunate casualty.
Everyone will face evil at some point in their lives, but the way the evil is embraced or deflected will differ among every man. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, symbolism is used to communicate the theme of Understanding the Inhumanity/Inherent Evil of Man as represented through the double ended spear, the fire, and the Lord of the Flies. The spear represents the evil inside of humankind and the perception that killing and hurting each other out of anger is acceptable. Fire symbolizes the evil act of stealing to achieve a human wants. Lastly, the Lord of the Flies symbolizes the Inherent Evil of Man through demonstrating that a boy understood that the evil is within them instead of around them, and is not something that could be killed
This shows a use of dramatic and situational irony. It’s dramatic because the reader knows that the “beast” is Simon, but the boys do not because of their fear-induced savagery. It’s situational because when he was attacked, Simon was on his way to tell the others his discovery about the “beast” on the mountain, but they thought he was the beast and killed him. This connects to the theme because it shows how the author uses figurative language to illustrate the causes of the boys’ fear, how they respond to it, and how they feel in the heat of the
We was scared!” (156) Simon knew the truth about the beast, he had the potential to rescue the boys from themselves yet they escalated the situation and killed him for trying to spread the good news. The death of Simon was a real turning point in the novel. When the once pure, almost Godly boy is furiously executed is when the decline of the conch truly
The collective fear of the unknown leads to the untimely and accidental death of Simon. The distress present in the boys causes their impulsive action, of Simon’s horrific murder. Fear of “the beast” an imaginary creature causes the boys to act irrational, and provokes survival instincts as a result of life threatening terror. The fear of the boys in this moment is epitomized when they chant, “Kill the beast!, Cut his throat, Spill his blood!” (168).
During Simon’s encounter with the Lord of the Flies, Golding reveals the central issue concerning human nature. Simon reaches the realization that they fear the beast because it exists within each of them. The Lord of the Flies tells Simon that the beast is inside each boy and cannot be killed. The boys go from behaving like civilized young men to brutal savages. “What I mean is…maybe it’s only us.”