Loretta Saunders was last seen on February 13, 2014 entering her Cowie Hill Road apartment building in Halifax to collect rent money from couple Blake Leggette and Victoria Henneberry subletting her apartment. Saunders’ murder was discussed two weeks prior her visit. Leggette recorded a fight in which they spoke of their financial issues and their inability to pay the rent. In this footage, Henneberry accused Leggette of wanting to kill Loretta and called him a liar as he repeatedly asked her “when did I say that?” and does not admit his longing to continue with the murder he previously spoke about. (Rhode, 2015)
In the police interrogation of Victoria Henneberry, she explains she did not have the money and had told Saunders she lost her bank card. She expressed she did not want her murder to take place and did not witness it occur but heard her screaming for help. Leggette killed Saunders’ by asphyxia and Henneberry claimed to be horrified and in disbelief and decided to leave certain clues. Saunders’ body was placed in a hockey bag and put in the trunk of the car. She also mentioned she was afraid her boyfriend will kill her as well. (Halifax police interrogation, 2015)
…show more content…
A comparative analysis was conducted between the portion of twigs found on Saunders’ hair and the wooden floor of the apartment rented to Leggette and Henneberry. The portion of twigs fit in the wooden floor of the dining room in a perfect re-alignment. (Leggette, 2014) Although comparative analysis clued the suspects related to the crime, the most effective evidence used in this crime was fingerprinting, an individual characteristic that attains an extreme high probability of associating the evidence found and gathered to the person or persons who committed the
#2 Name of case: 1977 Cold Case Murder Solved by a Hair Victim: James Anagnos Suspect: Frank Wright Impact of hair: A hair was found in the victim's hand and was tested and matched to the hair of Frank Wright. However, Wright passed away in 2002 which was before they ruled him as the murderer. #3 Name of Case: DA says fiber evidence
The overall problem the prosecution had when making the connection was linking the fingerprints to a parish of the crime. The conclusion was that "The finding of
but unlike blood the fingerprint is unique to a single person. The fingerprints that were recovered show the they belonged to anna. After analyzing the patterns of the fingerprint found and comparing them to and all of the suspects. They belonged to Anna. hair was recovered on the scene.
Hairs: Name of the case: The murder of James Anagnos Victim: James Anagnos Suspect: Frank Wright How the hair made a connection for the case: James Anagnos was found dead in her restaurant with a handful hair. DNA analysis, later, found the hair was Frank Wright but detectives only were able to create him a suspect after they found put him and the victim had an argument before closing that night- along with the hair. Name of the case: The murder a cab driver Victim: A unknown cab driver Suspect: Santae Tribble How the hair made a connection for the case: A case from 1978 involved a murder in Washington D.C.
In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent.
The perpetrator left a fingerprint on the doorknob of one of the victim’s bedroom doors and a herringbone pattern tennis shoe print in one of the victim’s front yard near the front door. The police questioned about thirty to forty men in the area and focused on one main suspect, Hayes. The police went to Hayes home and requested a fingerprint, and Hayes
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen, and welcome back to CTV News at 9:00 PM. I am Lisa LaFlamme. Tonight we are looking at the trial that is causing interest all over the country. The trial for the murder of Candy Kane. Mine Mean is the accused and he is presumed to be the killer of Kane.
On August 31, 1888, at about 3:40 am, Charles Cross and Robert Paul were walking down Bucksrow in London, England on a cool Friday morning. At the end of the alleyway, they noticed a bundle of blankets. When the two men kept walking, they noticed that bundle was not just blankets, but the body of Maryann Nichols, a prostitute that worked the Whitechapel area. She had her throat slashed and had been disemboweled. She seemed to have been only dead about a half hour, meaning that her killer was probably still in the area.
In the lab report three students are tested along with one suspect. Student number two’s DNA matched the suspects DNA. The student’s DNA’s are cut with five different enzymes as well as the suspects DNA. Student two’s DNA matched exactly with the suspects DNA; the other two student’s DNA did not resemble the suspects DNA at all. (Choi, et al, 2008) DNA fingerprinting is used a lot in determining who committed a crime.
Queenie Valupides is a young lady that is a suspect in the killing of her husband. Queenie Valupides is guilty for murdering her husband because of the fact that she was home alone for ten minutes, they have had a fight just a few hours ago, and there is a pan cooking on the stove and nobody has been at the house for a few hours. There is no evidence to a person being in the house while she was away. Although mr. Volupides dead body gave evidence that he had been drunk. The police can look at the fact that she had been at the house before her friends.
Crime Myths Most crimes are solved by fingerprints and DNA. This is a prime example of a crime myth. The truth is less than 1 percent of all serious crimes are solved by DNA, and fingerprints do only slightly better. As mentioned in USA Today titled "Crime and the media: Myths and reality", it discusses some of the important insight to crime in the media causing myths. Another source that covers this topic is in an Irish Times article by O’ Toole, Fintan entitled “Myths that conceal the truth about roots of crime: [CITY EDITION]” it goes over the many aspects that relate to myths that are contributing to the truth about roots of crime.
On December 23, 1981, Thomas Sophonow, a Canadian man, was wrongfully accused of murder. 16 year old Barbara Stoppel was ruthlessly killed at the washroom of her workplace. Unfortunately, eyewitnesses mistakenly chose Mr. Sophonow as being the murderer. Eye witnesses stated that a man, whose appearance was very similar to that of Thomas Sophonow, locked the door and made his way to the back of the shop where he was presumed to have strangled Barbara Stoppel to death. Furthermore, while Thomas Sophonow was in custody, he showed an undercover officer a door locking technique.
One of the pieces of evidence at the crime scene was hair that was caught around a hair tie. The hair tie was found with hair caught in it and lying next to Anna Garcia’s body. A microscope was used to compare the hair that was found at the scene to Anna’s hair and other suspects. After looking at and comparing each suspect’s hair, I was easily able to conclude that the hair belonged to Anna Garcia. The hair that was found at the crime scene perfectly matched Anna Garcia’s
The Richard Ramirez "Night Stalker" case was one of the first major cases to use automated fingerprinting technology (Frese, 2011). Today, the fingerprinting database gives various probable identifications, then a trained fingerprint expert must compare the prints to find a likely identification. Considering that Ramirez's prints were found on the mirror of a stolen vehicle we can conclude that his fingerprints were two-dimensional, therefore the prints are termed as latent or residue prints. The authorities at the crime scene power-dusted his prints considering that is the best physical method for collecting fingerprints. Once analyzed using the ACE-V (analysis, comparison, evaluation and verification) method, the fingerprint expert was able to identify them as belonging to Ramirez.
Although the Diane Downs case involved a murder many mothers have chosen their romantic interest over their children. Many women who choose to neglect their children for men usually live in poor conditions such as when a single mother can’t provide for her family she will find a man who can take care of business within the household, usually when single mothers find men to take care of their families the men tend to be abusive and sometimes sexual to children. A mother’s neglect and unwilling to put the needs of her children before her own can turn into a vicious cycle of abuse and substance abuse to forget what the last family line did to them in the past. Male and female children handle neglect and violence in different ways, female children