Loss Of Innocence In Forensics
It is quite normal for someone for someone to get in trouble at least once in their life, but was it their fault? That is a great question to ask oneself, the answer to that question sadly varies depending on the person. It is quite the norm for someone to experience a situation where they are falsely accused of doing something they had no a part of. It is painful to be suspected of something that one did not do. In fact, in many cases it may even ruin one’s life. However, in the game where it is the suspect 's word against the witness, it is hard to prove one’s own innocence. The chance of you winning any sort of favor from the neutral party is little, as everyone wants to place a blame on someone, so why not put it on the person everyone suspects. …show more content…
But in the shoes of the convicted, this matter means years of their life gone, these convictions on their permanent record and the constant judgement that follows. This is where the world of forensics is supposed to help out, an infallible titan in the world of uncertainty, but does it really? In fact, in my eyes forensics in most cases forensics makes most cases worse, ranging from unreliable testimonies, evidence that is incorrectly used to convict a person, and more. Of course people do believe this is fake because they sit down and turn on their t.v’s or open a book and dwell in the world of imagination where forensic is perfect. In a great world it would be, but there are various faults to it and there needs to be change in the way people gather and present evidence. Though many people may say it would be simpler to just change the jury system, it is
Case Brief Of R V Gudgeon
902 Words | 4 PagesThe appellant and various other members of the conspiracy were then arrested. As the trial was conducted, the appellant’s conviction was inevitable. There was overwhelming prosecution evidence of his guilt, to which the appellant added admissions on oath in the course of giving evidence at his trial. However, he would not have done so but for the prosecution evidence; a perusal of the material portion of the trial record reveals that the appellant’s purpose in giving evidence was to demonstrate how his involvement was connected to the activities of law enforcement officials and their agents.
Larry Youngblood Incident
964 Words | 4 PagesWhen evidence is collected it should be preserved so that it may be used if needed in the future. Also if a witness feels that the sketch is not exactly what the witness sees in their mind they should tell the sketch artist to fix it so that it does look like the person they have in mind. Larry Youngblood was one of the lucky ones and was exonerated with advanced technology allowing them to test the semen samples found in the clothing of David (Innocence Project
Trumps Science: The Case Of Picking Cotton
1247 Words | 5 PagesIn the studies conducted by Appleby and Kassin, it was reported that conviction rate went up by 20-30% with a confession, exculpatory DNA, and theory that might seem plausible was told by prosecutors (Appleby & Kassin, 2016). So far there are 19 cases known of innocent defendants that were still convicted with the exculpatory DNA because of their confessions to the authorities (Appleby & Kassin, 2016). The purpose of the article was to demonstrate the degree to which a confession, and not DNA, may be
Csi Effect Essay
760 Words | 4 PagesThe CSI Effect has been caused by the popular television show "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" and has given viewers an unrealistic view regarding forensic scientists, the use of forensics, and the criminal investigation itself. Forensics has become a rapidly growing field and has only been applied to criminal investigations since the latter part of the nineteenth century. The earliest use of forensics can be traced back to the Bertillion System created by Alphonse Bertillion of the Paris Police Department. He believed that certain skeletal features and physical traits could help identify individuals. Bertillion would use several photographs of individuals to help aid the identification process.
Jury System DBQ Essay
515 Words | 3 PagesThe Founding Fathers wanted the people of the United States to be in a democracy or self-government and established the jury system into the constitution. It is expensive and is a long process to start a jury trial. Also, jurors are not as professional as judges and can not determine a fair verdict. The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) effect might also affect the verdict of the jury. The American jury system should not be used because of it not being cost-effective, the lack of experience of the jury, which leads to justice not being served, and the CSI effect impacting the
To Kill A Mockingbird Ethos Pathos Logos
752 Words | 4 PagesWithout facts and evidence to prove someone's guilt it's impossible to convict them of the
Jury System Dbq Essay
1122 Words | 5 PagesOver the years, a plethora of court cases have caused Americans to wonder: is our jury system indeed as wondrous as it is conceived to be? To explain, the jury system is the concept of giving the defendant in a trial the option of either having a bench trial, one where a judge alone reaches a verdict, or a trial by jury, one where a group of twelve ordinary citizens is chosen to reach a verdict on the case. One may wonder why a dozen everyday denizens are being endowed with the absolute power over a possibly life or death decision in the life of a neighbor that is unknown to them, but the framers of the United States Constitution believed that this was the most democratic option in making sure that justice is properly served. Explaining further,
Jury Duty Dbq Essay
1285 Words | 6 PagesLike the Electoral College, several of the plans made by the Founding Fathers have lost some of their practicality. What worked in the past does not always work in the future, and this is the case for the jury system. The sole reason it was created was to ensure that each citizen was guaranteed a fair trial, which was a main concern due to Britain’s monarchy. In modern times, however, the judicial branch of the United States could easily give every citizen a fair trial with only a judge presiding over the case. It is clear that bench trials are superior to trials by jury because the citizens on juries are unqualified or biased, its benefits do not outweigh its burdens, and its claim to encourage civic duty is false.
Examples Of Mishandling The FBI
818 Words | 4 PagesIn Randall’s article, she gives a few examples of individuals who have been wrongly convicted, in the first example she says “Kirk L. Odom was wrongfully imprisoned for more than 22 years for a 1981 rape and murder. He completed his prison term in 2003, but it was not until July 2012 that DNA evidence exonerated him of the crimes.” (Randall 1) Randall states the fact that Odom even finished his sentence before the FBI figured out he was innocent, but what good is that if 22 years of his life were taken from him. And a similar case happened, in 1978 Santae A. Tribble was convicted for murder and was not exonerated until 2012.
DNA Exoneration Case Study
547 Words | 3 PagesStatement of the Problem DNA has become a vital part of criminal investigations. DNA can include and exclude suspects of criminal investigations. During a criminal investigation, all DNA should be collected, properly preserved and tested, but at times this does not occur or the technology was not available for this process to occur. In addition, DNA has become an imperative portion of exoneration cases.
Forensic Science Case Study
665 Words | 3 PagesScience has come a long way over the years. It has helped countless every day struggles and cure diseases most commonly found. What you don’t hear about however is the advancement of forensic science. Forensic science has helped solve countless cases of murder, rape, and sexual assault. In the case of John Joubert, it helped solve the murders of three young boys with one small piece of evidence that linked him directly to the crime.
Convicting The Innocent Summary
955 Words | 4 PagesThese wrongful convictions occur because the criminal justice system had many flaws. It was not only the system that had flaws but also the people on the board. The prosecutors "opposed testing, arguing that it would make no difference" whether or not those being convicted got DNA tested (Garrett 1). Confessions was one of the causes that often led to the downfall of those innocently convicted. In the case of Jeffrey Deskovic, the police officer was supposed to conduct the polygraph examination.
The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Conviction
949 Words | 4 PagesWith millions of criminal convictions a year, more than two million people may end up behind bars(Gross). According to Samuel Gross reporter for The Washington Post, writes that also “even one percent amounts to tens of thousands of tragic [wrongful conviction] errors”(Gross). Citizens who are wrongfully convicted are incarcerated for a crime he or she did not commit. Many police officers, prosecutors, and judges are responsible for the verdict that puts innocents into prison. To be able to get exonerated many wait over a decade just to get there case looked at, not many are able to have the opportunity of getting out.
Wrongful Convictions In Criminal Justice
539 Words | 3 PagesLuckily, it is known what causes wrongful convictions and how to fix them. Many wrongful convictions are due to mistaken eyewitnesses, jailhouse snitches, or false evidence. I think many of the wrongful convictions could be solved with harder evidence, more information. A case should not rely on a single eye witness but multiple.
Essay On Wrongful Convictions
1225 Words | 5 PagesFurthermore, there can be several factors at play when a wrongful conviction occurs and each case is unique. Three of the more common and detrimental factors that will be explored in this essay are eyewitness error, the use of jailhouse informants and professional and institutional misconduct. Firstly, eyewitness testimony can be a major contributor to a conviction and is an important factor in wrongful conviction (Campbell & Denov, 2016, p. 227). Witness recall and, frankly, the human emory are not as reliable as previously thought. In fact there has been much research showing the problems with eyewitness testimony such as suggestive police interviewing, unconscious transference, and malleability of confidence (Campbell & Denov, 2016, p.227).
More about Loss Of Innocence In Forensics
Case Brief Of R V Gudgeon
902 Words | 4 PagesLarry Youngblood Incident
964 Words | 4 PagesTrumps Science: The Case Of Picking Cotton
1247 Words | 5 PagesCsi Effect Essay
760 Words | 4 PagesJury System DBQ Essay
515 Words | 3 PagesTo Kill A Mockingbird Ethos Pathos Logos
752 Words | 4 PagesJury System Dbq Essay
1122 Words | 5 PagesJury Duty Dbq Essay
1285 Words | 6 PagesExamples Of Mishandling The FBI
818 Words | 4 PagesDNA Exoneration Case Study
547 Words | 3 PagesForensic Science Case Study
665 Words | 3 PagesConvicting The Innocent Summary
955 Words | 4 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Conviction
949 Words | 4 PagesWrongful Convictions In Criminal Justice
539 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Wrongful Convictions
1225 Words | 5 Pages