In the article, “Lost in America,” Douglas McGray effectively attracts attentions to the issue of how American schools are more concerned with learning math and science than foreign subjects like language or foreign cultures. Ironically, McGray asserts that more schools in America are becoming less concerned with teaching language and cultures despite the growing globalization. McGray advocates that learning multiple languages will be beneficial for those working overseas as well as other careers. The article’s target audience is aimed at those concerned with changing school’s curriculum to include various language education. A well-known writer for multiple magazines, McGray published this article in Foreign Policy magazine intending for the …show more content…
McGray uses statistics to bring the issue into focus for the audience, so they can see how drastically foreign education changed in a short period of time. The article discusses the change from how in the late 1940s, “more than 90% of kids who studied a foreign language learned French, Spanish, or Latin” (). Then later describes how “two thirds of American students never studied a second language by the year 2000” (). This brings into focus of how things have changed in the American school system. In between these quotes, McGray discusses how a 13,000 high school students learned Chinese, thinking that China would be the next world power (). The statistics demonstrated by the quotes are used to inspire the audience to get back to a place where learning another language is encouraged. The quotes demonstrate the beginning of the decline and ignorance of languages in America. McGray uses the statistic of 13,000 children learning Chinese to show the influence outside countries have on American education. The author also uses this to show how this influence inspires students to learn and how just learning about a countries culture will incite students to learn its language. Statistics speak for themselves in McGray’s article to communicate the difference that time and experience has on foreign …show more content…
His audience consists to those who have the power to change education: education policymakers, parents, and educators. McGray reminds the audience that the lack of students learning another language is a problem and isn’t going away anytime soon. McGray starts his argument by holding a mirror up to the audience in the form of the anecdote of the clueless Christina, then builds his argument by using expert opinions to build the support for his issue. Finally, statistics are used to offer a comparison between time periods. McGray engages the audience by cleverly demonstrating the issue and proceeding to explain why things need to change. The audience is the key to this change, teachers can incorporate unconventional subjects in lesson plans as McGray shows with the example of Eugene Astilla (). According to McGray, America needs more students to learn about multiple cultures and languages as it will be vital to their future. It will be help in careers overseas and in making or breaking deals in government. It would be beneficial to learn from other countries to better our own. McGray successfully demonstrates that even though the problem of lack of languages spoken in America has been presented many times before in the past, doesn’t mean it has to stay a current issue of
Ehrenreich discusses poverty in the United States and more specifically the “culture of poverty”. Ehrenreich shows the effect of Michael Harringtons’s book “The Other America” and how it shaped the conservative view of poverty. After Harrington’s book, poverty was seen as personal issue not a social issue. The book gave reasoning for sepperating us from them, poor from rich, or educated from non-educated. Many governing politicians used this book to form there view of poverty and to see it as a problem with the person, not a problem with economics or wealth distribution.
Abraham and Mary Todd Lincoln walked into the presidential booth late at Ford’s Theatre in Washington, D.C. on Good Friday, April 14, 1865. They sat next to two of their friends, Henry Rathbone and his fiancé, Clara Harris. The four of them and the audience watched “Our American Cousin” in the theatre. Oh, how unaware they all were of their unknown companion as they laughed at the humour in the performance!
Rocio describes her classes being very basic and taught in Spanish which made her feel very comfortable. But after realized that she wished the system would have challenged her in English so she could be prepared for further education instead of simple catering her language. She hopes they challenge other students because, in the long run, it’s worth
In his article “Lost in America,” Douglas McGray highlights the isolationism of the American educational system Through his article, McGray expresses his concerns about the lack of focus of the American education system on the learning of foreign culture. The article was issued by Foreign Policy magazine in 2006. McGray’s target audiences are the ones that can make changes in the educational curriculum, which signifies that his intended audience includes American legislators involved in American curriculum policies. McGray, who is co-creator and editor-in-chief of Pop-Up Magazine claims that the American education has an isolationist curriculum.
The author of American Wasteland, Jonathan Bloom, uses many techniques to steer readers in his direction. Bloom talks about a big issue concerning American in 2010 and is still an issue today in 2016, six years after he wrote this book. As a result of broad research, the main issue today is expiration dates and how state regulations and laws promote food waste (Linnekin). As other books, articles, and documentaries explain this issue they use evidence, positive and negative connotations, and bias to connect with a general audience or supporters.
The Other Education Rhetorical Analysis David Brooks is a well-refined journalist for the New York Times News Paper Company. He writes many different controversial articles, that tends to focus around arguments of education. Within Brooks’ arguments he uses effective techniques to persuade the audience. In this specific column, he addresses society as a whole, but with special emphasis on students. David Brooks successfully persuades his audience through his presentation of his claim, his persuasive writing style, and his usage of emotional appeals.
“My classmates reacted as though I’d attributed the delivery to the Antichrist. They were mortified” (Ibid, 464). He quickly discovers that he is not on one side of the cultural divide but two sides. He neither understands nor is understood. This series of events leads to him questioning the reason for learning a new language and inferring that he would rather be ignorant because he doubts his ability to learn.
The first time one is able to comprehend the meaning of a word is a momentous childhood moment that is forever engraved in one’s memory. Books and reading are significantly impactful to people’s lives; Mark Twain said that, “books are for people who wish they were somewhere else.” This statement is apropo for Sherman Alexie, who was a Native American living on a reservation during the time he learned to read. Sherman Alexie convinces his audience that an education is crucial to being successful by using personal anecdotes to captivate and create a connection with his audience and repetition to reiterate the importance of having an education. Alexie's use of personal anecdotes fortifies the impact he has on his audience.
The parent’s perspective towards bilingual education was like the student’s opinions because both individuals felt immersion classrooms benefit the students and the parents. The father of Jason was proud his son was the first in his family to read, write, and speak in English. Jason’s father knew his son would have many career opportunities by learning English at school. Learning the English academic language was not the only proud language Jason’s father encouraged for Jason to learn but also the Spanish language as well. Jason’s father only speaks Spanish so if his son was to lose his home language, a language barrier would form between father and son.
“Teachers of English and literature have either submitted, or are expected to submit, along with teachers of the more "practical" disciplines, to the doctrine that the purpose of education is the mass production of producers and consumers” (Berry). Berry uses the word practical to describe the way in which we produce students as though they were massed produced. School systems today demonstrate specialization, and with that follows oversimplification. “In our society, which exists in an atmosphere of prepared, public language-language that is either written or being read illiteracy is both a personal and a public danger” (Berry). While schools relax their education standards and primarily focus on profitability, we become vulnerable to loss of literacy through
According to Jarmel and Schneider (2010), by the year 2025, one-third of students attending public schools will not know English when they start Kindergarten. How will schools adapt to this? Will teachers and/or students be limited on what they can teach/learn throughout the school year because of time restraints? In a documentary Speaking in Tongues, directed by Jarmel & Schneider (2010), four students who range from Kindergarten to eighth grade, showcase their experiences about attending public school around the San Francisco area to become bilingual. The four students Durrell, Jason, Julian, and Kelly are taught in English and also in a second language such as Mandarin, Spanish, Chinese, and Cantonese.
For Chin community’s children, many people came to the United States at a young age that they barely know anything about their culture. It was hard for them to live in a mix-cultures because they are comfortable with the American culture, yet they also acquire to live with their parents’ culture. However, inside of their household, their parents taught them their culture’s tradition and show them certain part of the tradition. Those lessons make kids know about their own culture and be able to understand in many ways including language barrier that they have. Thous, a few children who did not learn their native culture also bear a hard time dealing with all these native-new-cultures things.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than the genuine ignorance. Back in my high school, my school had a certain curriculum where students were made into four different groups. The tactical rule was that each group should ensure that its member must not speak any language other than English, else it would cost them a point. The objective was to learn proficiency in the language and attain personal development. But what could have been a potential impact on us, soon turned out to a bitter experience.
Questions of abandoning or maintaining one’s home language affects education policy in all immigrant receiving nations. Because of the consequences of colonisation, migration, nation-formation, traditions of exogamy, and modernisation, some degree of bilingualism is typical of most people in the world.” Today the most advanced nations realise that they can no longer be ignorant of the languages and cultures of other people on this planet. This is why bilingual-multicultural education was initiated. It was believed that this approach will build closer ties between the students’ community, their language background, and the educational plan of the school.
Therefore, teachers must accommodate students who do not necessarily speak the same languages (Moodley, 2013:74 -75). To ensure that student’s education is not compromised, a target language needs to be implemented to ensure that the subject being taught is acknowledged by the learners. However the “language barrier” would also create an opportunity to code-switch, which will benefit learners to a great extent. It will not only eliminate the isolated feelings of students but accommodate their language and cultural backgrounds. Furthermore, a teacher will be able to teach their class to the extent where they will be motivated to learn.