Post Thirty Years war left France looking for a new leadership style that would give plenty of stability. What France received was Louis XIV, who would reign under the new absolute monarchy government. During Louis’ reign, divine rights controlled rank in society. This left many confused on why they were picked to be at the bottom of society, and why the king was given his power. Jean Domat, a royally appointed juror by king Louis helped explain a better understanding of the new system of governance to the people of France in his writings.
He ruled by divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from god and was therefore responsible e to god alone (doc 1). During this time King Louis XVI became too powerful. King Louis XVI way of ruling is by divine right . Which led to a lot of despair in his country. One of the causes of the French Revolution is the unfair treatment of the third estate
He raised taxes on the lower people. During that time the American Revolution influenced them to rebel and also the philosophers of the enlightenment. These three examples became the result of the French revolution. King Louis xvi had many powers. He made and enforced the laws.
Louis XIV of France, who dominated Europe with his strength and army, was the most successful absolute king. He had a different perspective on how to rule France. With this different mindset came big dreams from Louis that he was determined to achieve. France ruled Europe in a similar manner to how Spain ruled previously. It was eventually not long before France surpassed Spain in power, and in the end, France became the most powerful nation in Europe because of Louis's dedication to his ambitions.
When most people think about France and Kings I believe the first French King that comes to mind is King Louis XIV. King Louis XIV ruled France from 1643 to o1715 he was the son of King Louis VII, but he did not rule personally over France himself until he was 23 years old after Marzain died. King Louis XIV inherited the crown at just four years old which at the time he wasn’t able to rule over a country so it was left up to Cardinal Jules Mazarin and King Louis’s mother Anne of Austria until he was able to do so. Once Louis came to the throne he was then referred to as The Sun King because he believed that he was appointed by God to be the King was made to believe that he was appointed by God himself to be a deputy for France. Nobody challenged
That is why absolute monarchy is a negative system, as the government begins to care more about power and not their fellow ones. As said before, absolute monarchy is a bad way to rule a country, and Charles I can give us an example why. His reign was made of only his decisions, and no one could say the contrary. He could raise taxes, and imprison
Oliver Cromwell Oliver Cromwell opposed of the Long Parliament of 1640. He was a Puritan and fought for the Parliament during the Civil War. Later on, he ruled over Parliament and took away some of its power. Oliver thought that specifically the Parliamentary leaders did not try hard enough to defeat Charles Cromwell. Then he later became the greatest leader and man of England at the time, over the “New Model Army” that contained mostly progressive, Puritan soldiers, but he normally argued with others.
Louis XIV was born on September 5, 1638, in Saint-Germaine-en-Laye, France. He became king in 1643. In 1661, he started to improve France. Louis was always in a war with someone. By the 1680s, Louis XIV generated public hostility or conflicts.
King/Saint Louis IX has been improving our government since he first stepped onto the throne. He is the most generous, devoted, and honorable king France has ever seen! King Louis always puts his people first and does all he can to pursue his religious goals. I truly do believe that he fully lives up to his ‘Saint’ name. King Louis has done many things to improve his kingdom.
GOLD: I think historians were right to think of Louis XIV as the perfect example of an absolute monarch. Louis XIV had a very dominant personality and he demanded to be in control of everything. If he was denied the right have control over something Louis XIV would then fight to have it. Louis XIV ruled in such a way that he gave people no choice but to agree with him and let him do his
English parliament and Absolute French Monarchy had two divergent political styles, however both bringing success and prosperity. These two political styles differentiated from each other, while also sharing similarities. The French governed with a tactic called absolute monarchy, where the king exerted complete control over his people and weld unrestricted political power over everybody. In this political system the king handpicked his own nobles, secretaries, and ministers.
In 1789, France was precariously balanced on the edge of chaos. King Louis XVI was ruling monarch of France. King Louis’ youth depicted him as reckless, thoughtless, and unwise. A series of bad financial and political decisions, lead to his unpopularity among the people of France. King Louis was young, distracted and misguided.
By weakening his nobility, Louis XIV had to ability to make sure anything that happened in France was under his control. These nobles did not even have to ability employ someone without specifically asking their king for his permission. An example of his authority over French nobles is shown in a meeting he once prevented from occurring
One of the most prominent examples of resistance to absolute monarchy came, in England, where King and Parliament struggled to determine the roles each should play in governing England (Duiker 2013). After the death of Queen Elizabeth I in 1603, the Stuart line of rulers was inaugurated with the accession to the throne of Elizabeth’s cousin, King James VI of Scotland. James I (1603-1625) espoused the divine right of kings, a viewpoint that alienated Parliament, which had grown accustomed under previous rulers to act on the premise that monarch and Parliament together ruled England as balanced polity (Duiker 2013). The Puritans were alienated by the king as well, which wasn’t a wise decision. The Puritans were the Protestants within the Anglican
They began the French Revolution, which wouldn’t have been possible if Louis’ actions hadn’t been as drastic as they were. To a greater extent, King Louis XVI can be held accountable for the main causes of the French Revolution due to the wars that he refused to drop because of his stubborn personality and the National
