Lucky´s speech is probably the most spectacular part of “Waiting for Godot”, since it presents a complete dissolution of language. But this does not mean that Beckett wrote this piece without any sense, this piece was written with intention, with structure, but it is hidden. The presence of Repetition gives a particular rhythmic sonority, with a lot of unconnected phrases that create a well-planned net to be discovered. When analyzing tge structure, the first thin that catches the attention is that it must be a challenge for the actor to perform the speech because of its length ( over 700 words), the lack of punctuation, and the apparent randomness of utterances. This monologue in particular is an attempt to reflect a “parody of scientific discource”, and this is shown by the use of expressions such as “given”, “ a result of research”, which are proper to scientific talk. (significance?) This attempt of scientific discourse establishes a …show more content…
Wee uses the phrase “wastes and pines” to suggest that ther is not only a physical atrophy, but a mental one as well. This notion is reingorced by specific examples “in spite of…the practice of sports…penicillin and succedanea…”. The word in this discourse has no value. Nihilism is the essence, mixed with the allusion of our contemporary lives, our concerns of God, Science and its studies, Health and Nutrition, and Sports; are all stated in order to appear insignificant. Beckett even makes fun of language and shows us how useless it can be. He invents words in this monologue like “athambia” and “quaquaquaqua”. He even tries to use some words that can sound vulgar, like the name “Fartov”, that sounds like the word “Fart”, and the word “Testew”, which souds like “Testes”. He also uses sentences of our culture that gives a fake certainty, such as “Acacacacademy of Anthropopopometry”, because they are given by science “without any doubt” and then finishing with “for reasons
In her text, “Cognition, Convention and Certainty,” Patricia Bizzell describes the writing process through both inner-directed and outer-directed theories in order to illustrate that the writing process is infirmed by both student’s natural thought processes and their discourse community She uses her text to explain both theories, and to argue for the implementation of a new pedagogy focused on discourse analysis. First, Bizzell introduces the inner –directed theory, which seeks to discover the writing processes through the universal and fundamental structure of language. Conversely, she explains that the outer-directed theory instead argues that the individual’s discourse community does not teach a generalized form of language but rather the
John M. Barry addresses his feelings about scientists and their research through the piece from, “The Great Influenza,” an account of the 1918 flu epidemic. He adopts a speculative tone and utilizes rhetorical strategies such as fallacies, metaphors, and word choice to characterize scientists research. Barry describes the positive mind set and the requirements to be a scientists. The requirements of being a scientist would not only be, “intelligence and curiosity,”but to also to be open minded and to have courage.
In conclusion, the characteristics of the scientific method are far from few. Most distinctly, science deals with the uncertainty of the unknown, attempting to make it known. Though complicated, Barry explains his beliefs on the scientific method with strong diction to show the formality of science, rhetorical questions to show the uncertainty, and logos to show the intellect of science. His rhetorical strategies help the audience understand the plethora of characteristics in the realm of
In an excerpt from The Great Influenza by John M. Barry, many rhetorical devices are used to fully represent the process of a scientist. Some of the most commonly used devices are metaphors, anaphoras, and imagery, these three devices help the reader understand the main ideas of the story. The metaphors allow the reader to perceive the process of a scientist in more simplistic ideas such as science being an undiscovered wilderness. The anaphora used in the beginning of the passage emphasises that the world of science is full of uncertainty and is constantly changing, this drives the idea into the mind of the reader. The imagery is used alongside the metaphors to assist the reader in grasping the foreign ideas.
By capturing the emotions, Goodman is able to draw the reader into the context of the book and find a deeper understanding of the issues that arise by relating to the emotions that are associated with it. Goodman’s use of descriptive text, character relations and emotions creates a compelling argument that fiction is able to add value to explore issues raised in the world of science. By allowing the audience of Intuition to understand issues raised in science, Goodman can effectively communicate complicated science
The first of three questions Grant-Davie asks about exigence is what is the discourse about? This question addresses fact and definition. This can be answered with the obvious topic or in an abstract way with fundamental issues. Grant-Davie noted that
Windsor: Black Moss, 2004. Shaw, Caitlin. The Power of Discourse. N.p., 10 Apr. 2005. Web.
A discourse community is a group of people that share a set of values and goals. Members of a discourse community have their own way of communicating within the group and with the public. Although the communities may differ in subject matter and appearance, they do share varying levels of similarities. The three-discourse communities that we will be focusing on are: art, research biology and finance: specifically, the financial service sector. Furthermore, we will be comparing the three-discourse communities on: similarities among all the groups, similarities between each group and the differences among all three.
Creations, like most things in life, are improvable. Ideas and theories are always evolving into different ideas or more sophisticated ones. Discourse communities is a term that has been debated over the years. Three of those debaters are James Paul Gee, James P. Porter, and John Swales. In this essay I will analyze what each of these writers see as the definition of a discourse community while comparing specific points that each of them have regarding their personal view on the subject.
Barry’s use of syntax to effectively state his argument, his use of diction to allow the reader to comprehend the meaning of a phrase, and the allegories to add further emphasis to his main points all are important rhetorical strategies. These strategies don’t just emphasize the important of certainty and how it can benefit the field of science, but they also describe how uncertainty can also impact discoveries and how it can prohibit discoveries from being
The macrostructure of this talk consists of Introduction, Body and Conclusion. The length of Introduction is 300 words (10.3%). Meyer chooses to make a shocking statement (with a bit of humor mixed in). She states that a person who sits to the listener’s right and to the left is a liar.
Karl Popper was a twentieth-century philosopher that had a dissatisfaction with the definition of what could be considered a “science.” The claim of falsification, being able to equally be observed false, made Popper’s argument of demarcation appealing to those with the same inquiries about the method of scientific progress. Popper said to be defined as a real science, one needs to make risky, bold predictions that could easily be refuted by observation. I will argue that the construction of Popper’s scientific progress is flawed due to the refutations of infinite hypotheses and observational unreliability.
“Imagination no longer has a function”, says Emile Zola in his essay, ‘Naturalism in the Theatre’. Many of the ideas which Zola has discussed in this essay have been taken up by modern theatre, both in theory and practice. Modern theatre, for instance, is aware of the fact that analysis and not synthesis should be the basis for theatrical production. It is with this theory at the back of his mind that Bertolt Brecht has discussed theatre’s role as an educator only if the elements associated with spectacle are removed from theatre.
There have been numerous reports of “peculiar” instances when Godot was brought to the spotlight, each adding their own flavor to the play, resulting in the belief of some that these unconventional stage shows were exactly what gave the otherwise monotonous drama its edge. Several of these productions were put on by inmates of various prisons across the globe, further defining the history of the play. Godot changed the scene in a completely unexpected manner, one that the critics who saw the debut of the drama back in 1953, in Paris could not have possibly predicted. The aim of this essay is to introduce the
This text is taken from a lecture that was given by William Morris about the importance of the arts. In this lecture he tries to convince his audience why the arts are beneficial and should be available to not only the wealthy but also ordinary people. He uses personification and imagery in order to make what he is saying more interesting, and also uses inclusive language to appeal to the whole audience. The first paragraph begins with the personification of Science; “And Science - we have loved her well, and followed her diligently, what will she do?”.