This story begins with Euphiletos trying to defend himself in court. He has a man named Lysias write his defense speech. In this speech the events of what went on in the past few weeks that led up to him killing Eratosthenes. He pretty much states that he was very gullible and his wife simply tricked him. He trusted her in every way and believed that she would act properly. Even when things happened out of the ordinary Euphiletos did not suspect anything of it. Only after he was approached by a slave woman of a former mistress of Eratosthenes. She told him that Eratosthenes “makes it a career to corrupt women” (pg. 98). After that moment Euphiletos started to question everything his wife has done in the past few weeks, and how it was out of the ordinary. So he questioned their servant slave and after some convincing she spilled the beans, and not only did she do that but she also offered to help catch the two in the act. After a few weeks Euphiletos has a plan, which in his speech he says it was totally unplanned. He goes and gathers all the man to be witnesses when he catches his wife in the act. At the end of his speech he says that he had no intention of killing Eratosthenes, it just all happened quickly and unintentionally. He …show more content…
First of all he paid someone to write his speech, so that must mean he has wealth. Being wealthy in their society meant a lot. If a person was wealthy they could get away with many things. Also, the speech he had Lysias write for him appealed to the people in the jury, which were everyday people like farmers and merchants (lecture). Euphiletos also had many witnesses that were just random people he found, at least that is what he said. Another thing is that Eratosthenes has done this to other ladies according to some, and some of the jurors could probably relate, and also thought about it happening to their
Alcibiades admired Socrates like stated above. Socrates was found to have attraction and relations to teenage boys which was a contributing factor within his conviction. Alcibiades did not help with this. It was then later found that Alcibiades did in fact feel some shame in his
Marquis Deveaux II Professor Steven Karnes HRS 10 17 October 2016 The Man of Artéte Gray clouds suddenly appear, moving swiftly, a waterfall of rain starts pouring out. Thunder fills the sky, with its loud roars, lightning flashed down upon everyone in its path. Dead bodies everywhere no one could have survived this but one man comes out with the glowing yellow skin of a god, muscles that would move elegantly with every move, and a man that looked like no other. A man Odysseus.
Later in his argument, he asks the jury to excuse his ordinary language and rather to “consecrate your attention on whether what I say is just or not, for the excellence of a judge lies in this, as that of a speaker lies in telling the truth” (Plato 18a). By demonstrating that he does not speak with eloquence or enticement, Socrates proves to speak with honesty and plainness, which shows that he considers truth a virtue. Here he also reveals why it is so important for both a speaker and a judge to focus on the truth; in a court, both are under an oath: the speaker to be honest, and the judge to be just based on the speaker’s actions. By asking the jury to ignore the eloquence of words he uses and focus on the truthfulness of what he is saying, Socrates shows that he is confident that the facts and correctness of his argument will lead the jury to see his innocence and the slander of his accuser’s claim. However, the jury do not seem to adhere to Socrates’ plea and gives its verdict of guilty, and Meletus asks for the death penalty.
As Penelope led them to believe they were meant to stay, they continued to inhabit her home. Antinous’ anecdote logically explains how Penelope’s
HUM2225 Dr. Hotchkiss September 30, 2016 Moral Insight Plato’s Euthyphro is based on a lesson between Socrates and Euthyphro outside of the Athenian court about the definition of pious or impious. Euthyphro was surprised to see Socrates there and even more curious to find out why he was there. Socrates explained that the court was persecuting him for impiety because Meletus was spreading rumors about him corrupting the Athenian youth. Euthyphro explains to Socrates that he was there to prosecute his father for murdering a farm worker named Dionysus.
What is a hero? Do you know what a hero is? Do you know what kind of characteristics a hero must have? Well do you? No?
Socrates hears of this and immediately goes to tries to explain to Euthyphro that he himself would be committing an impious action. “it is unholy for one to prosecute his father.” With that rolling through Euthyphro’s mind, Socrates ask him, “what do you think
Furies insist on the killing of Orestes because murder of his mother could not have any justification and the divine punishment was set right after the act of killing . The argumentation on the trial of Athena moves based on the old tradition which encompasses around Zeus. Furies claim that Clytemnestra’s murder of her husband was not exile-worthy because they were not blood-related . Killing of a father is not an as serious crime as killing of a mother because Zeus killed his father Kronos too . These arguments of Furies make it clear that their judgement is matriarchal biased.
In this paper I will examine why Socrates did not attempt to appease the jury in his Apology. Socrates is put on trial for corrupting the youth and believing in gods other than the gods of the city. I believe he chose not to appease the jury for three reasons: he is a man of pride, he does not fear death and additionally finds it shameful to fear death. Socrates is a man of pride.
After Telemachus and his father share a reunion, he leads his father to his house. Upon arrival, Odysseus disguises himself as a beggar and finds that the house has been taken over by sires trying to court his wife as a result of his actions. After completing Athena’s task, Odysseus reveals himself to his wife. However, Odysseus finds it very difficult to convince his wife that he has truly come back. When Odysseus reveals something no one else knows, Penelope runs to him and throws her arms around him.
The purpose behind Socrates cross-examination technique was to inquire and open a discussion based on asking and answering questions, to stimulate deeper thought and critical thinking of ideas discussed to counter the charges and make them seem invalid. The implementation of this cross-examination technique occurs when Socrates asks Meletus, “Tell me, my good sir, who improves our young men?”(Apology 24e). Meletus getting embarrassed in front of the jury by Socrates with the claims and comments like, “You see, Meletus, that you are silent and know not what to say” and simply answers, “The laws,” which was not a good enough answer to counter Socrates claims. At this point Socrates began to change the perspective of the trial with some simple intelligent questions. With the consistent questioning of Socrates, Meletus accepted that members of the assembly were all good influences on the youth, but considering the assembly admits all adult males, he mistakenly claims and admits that the entire population of Athens was a positive influence on the youth, except Socrates.
Is Euthyphro pious in prosecuting his father? According to the Euthyphro, the main characters like Socrates and Euthyphro have their own notions about piety. The way the main characters understand piety is different from each other. The first, Euthyphro examines himself and brings evidence against his father.
One of the charges brought against him was corrupting the youth of Athens. Accordingly to the words of those who complained at
“ I beg the ancient privilege of Athens: as she is mine, I may dispose of her, which shall either be with this fine gentleman (Demetrius) or to her death according to our law, immediately provided in that case” (1.1.45-48). Hermia wishes to marry her true love Lysander, who in turn loves her as well; however, even though he is as good a man as Demetrius, status-wise, Hermia’s father, Egeus, would rather kill her or turn her into a nun than let Hermia control her life. This practice was widely done by the Elizabethans. Daughters had no choice but to marry the man their father
In many people’s eyes, it is seen that fate is something that one can not escape. In Oedipus Rex, by Sophocles, Oedipus gives a speech to the citizens of Thebes, about the murder of their previous leader, Laius. And in this speech, he explains the hardship that the murderer will have to eventually face. In Oedipus’s speech from Oedipus Rex, Sophocles uses the literary device of dramatic irony to develop the central idea that fate is destined to happen, and can possibly bring more intensified consequences when avoided. If one tries to escape their fate, the conflicts that occur can be more severe than they were supposed to be. One can infer that what Oedipus is stating will eventually happen to him in the end of the play, if he is classified as the murderer.