Machiavelli's Goodness Of The State

1146 Words5 Pages
There are several vital aspects to Machiavelli's regard he's one among the foremost important political theorists of his and our time, particularly looking back to the growth of realistic political approach. the primary factor one has to recognize so as to understand Machiavelli's thought is that he lived in turbulent political times at the start of the Renaissance time.

He believes that the well-being of the state is that the responsibility of the ruler and will be achieved by any means possible, even by deceptions, treacheries, and intrigues. The ruler's personal morality is of way less importance than the goodness of the state because the ruler judged by the results of his reign instead of the means that he used. He magnificently declared that sensible rulers generally ought
…show more content…
Machiavelli argued that the most victorious kings were not those who acted in line with dictates of law, or justice, or conscience, however those willing to try to do anything that was necessary to preserve their own control--and therefore indirectly preserve the goodness of the state. Machiavelli tells us that the sovereign should take any action that is important to keep up the order in society. In time this may result in the most compassionate decision too. Machiavelli explains that, Cesare Borgia, by by making use of cruelty was able to accomplish order, goodness and obedience in Romagna. On the other hand, due to the inaction of the Florentines, allowed internal conflict to develop in Pistoia, leading to devastation of the town. Therefore, variety of extremely visible executions can be effective means of controlling the individuals and in preventing a serious happening of violence and murder. Machiavelli additional concludes that it's hard to be loved and feared at the same time. Hence, one should choose to be feared than to be loved .…show more content…
In fact, it did, however Japan would never conform to surrender even after the first bomb was dropped. Thus, a choice was given to Japan, surrender or, USA will need to drop another bomb. Ultimately after the second bomb, with Tokyo probably being next. Japan gave up and surrendered. Now that is my example of how the ends justifies the means. The President of the USA, and perhaps high officers had to weigh the ends so as to justify the means of how to bring an end to war with Japan. Japan started it by bombing Pearl Harbor on December 7th 1941. I am certain no sane Americans wished to kill thousands of Japanese people, as well as innocent kids. However, the war may have continued on for years. Thousands of young American men would have died horrifying deaths or would have been prisoners of war. perhaps even some more death marches just like the Baton Death March. the Japanese were fanatical Fighters, Willing to die for their Emperor. to maintain the world peace and save their own individuals, USA had to finish the
Open Document