ipl-logo

Machiavelli Vs Hobbes Research Paper

624 Words3 Pages

Philosophers have shaped the way in which we look at how societies function to better understand the universe. Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes are considered to be two of the most influential philosophers in history that have guided the way of thinking about human nature. Machiavelli is most famous for “The prince,” which praised and hoped to persuade rulers to enforce a republican government. Hobbes is best known for his work “leviathan,” which outlines the needs for a sovereign to rule and a social contract to be made. Both philosophers are realists and both identify the need for a ruler. Throughout the examination of the philosophers, both Machiavelli and Hobbes have identified similar theories about political power, however have different views on how the sovereign should behave, methods on becoming and staying in power, as well as his duties when it comes to the people. I personally believe that Hobbes approach and motive behind his theories is more beneficial as the main purpose is to protect society while Machiavelli’s approach motivated by self-interest and creates a corrupt ruler.
Machiavelli and Hobbes both support the idea of a sovereign however have very different views on how the sovereign should behave. The …show more content…

Hobbes believed that natural state of humans was violent and therefore needed order and control to ensure a just and equal society (Robinson 2016, 4). However Hobbes believed that a sovereign could maintain power without deceit and manipulation. Hobbes believed in the social contract which is when people could have a moral understanding about right and wrong to avoid the chaotic violent human nature. Hobbes believed in the idea of utilitarianism which would “maximize the most good and minimize the pain” (Robinson 201, 4). This would ensure that the sovereign was doing things for the right reasons and not to better himself but to better society as a

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast John Locke And Thomas Jefferson

    1306 Words  | 6 Pages

    Achieving Change In Obama’s Inauguration even he stated that “Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek. ”(Obama)

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Aristotle And Hobbes

    995 Words  | 4 Pages

    Anyone can claim that their doctrines stand quite different, but let’s do not judge so at first sight. “Hence, it is evident that a city is a natural production, and that man is naturally a political and social animal.” (Aristotle, Politics, 125a3.) According to Aristotle, man naturally is a social and, consequently, he considers man as an animal in the Politics and says that man is ordered toward the community. On the other hand, Hobbes claims that man is naturally ordered toward the individual, and this individual is himself.

    Read More

  • How Did Thomas Hobbes Influence The Constitution

    1425 Words  | 6 Pages

    Hobbes’ depiction of the role of the sovereign presented a subtle but distinct understanding in the formation

    Read More

  • The Prince And Niccolò Machiavelli And Thomas Hobbes

    1536 Words  | 7 Pages

    Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher during the Renaissance that wrote The Prince as a guide to the Governor of Florence, Lorenzo De Medici who needed to regain control and power. Thomas Hobbes, a British philosopher, wrote the famous Leviathan during the English Civil war. The current political state of England is reflected in his work and his seen through the way Hobbes perceives humans. These philosophers have taken the earliest ideas of Socrates and transformed them into their own works about achieving and sustaining power, constructing political authority and natural human behavior. Socrates would respond with his own positive and negatives about each of the theorists ideas.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Influence On Thomas Jefferson's Declaration Of Enlightenment

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    One his theories, stated in his book called Leviathan said that people are not able rule themselves because of how selfish mankind is and they need to be ruled by an iron fist. His political theory was that was also stated in Leviathan was that we should respect government authority under all circumstances to avoid violence. Hobbes was scared of the outcome of the social contract which meant people could get rid of the government if they were unhappy with what they were getting. In order to make well with the social contract he states in Leviathan that people should be completely obedient to the government. His reasoning was that if there was no government, there would be chaos.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Hobbes And Rousseau

    1351 Words  | 6 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes, two titans of the Enlightenment, work within similar intellectual frameworks in their seminal writings. Hobbes, in Leviathan, postulates a “state of nature” before society developed, using it as a tool to analyze the emergence of governing institutions. Rousseau borrows this conceit in Discourse on Inequality, tracing the development of man from a primitive state to modern society. Hobbes contends that man is equal in conflict during the state of nature and then remains equal under government due to the ruler’s monopoly on authority. Rousseau, meanwhile, believes that man is equal in harmony in the state of nature and then unequal in developed society.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli Research Paper

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    To evaluate Machiavelli in terms of political philosophy we don’t need to look very further since he goes by the name ‘thinker who founded the modern political philosophy’. When I look at him through political theories I see a true realist. He clearly denies morality in political action. This thought opposes another thinker’s ideas. Kant believed that the intentions were more important than the results where Machiavelli basically says end justifies the means.

    Read More

  • How Does Hobbes Perspective Reflect Today

    167 Words  | 1 Pages

    After analyzing the varying social contract theories, my paper explains why Hobbes’s perspective reflect today’s society more than the other two theories. The very first point Hobbes bring up in his theory is that all men are naturally self interested. He states, “Given that men are naturally self-interested, yet they are rational, they will choose to submit to the authority of a Sovereign in order to be able to live in a civil society, which is conducive to their own interest”(3). This statement mirror today’s society because most people are motivated to do things that’ll benefit them in a long run.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    1740 Words  | 7 Pages

    Hobbes was an English philosopher, known through out the world as the author of “Leviathan” which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of the social contract theory. His writings were greatly influenced by the

    Read More

  • Hobbes Separation Of Power

    234 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hobbes’ philosophy can be found within the novel in many points of the story. He believed that the best kind of government was one in which society is organized under one authority, “Where there is no common power, there is no law; where no law, no justice.” In this society all individuals give up some rights for the sake of protection. There is no doctrine of separation of powers in Hobbes’ discussion. Although Hobbes philosophy about human nature is logical and compatible with human rationale, his political theories involving leadership; though sensible in part are illogical.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Hobbes

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    Hello Thomas, good question. While I do not believe that an absolute monarchy or some other totalitarian government is necessary for the running of the state. I do believe that both Hobbes and Machiavelli had a point to promoting a more centralized state, in an effort to be able to field national armies. If you look at the medieval ages, power was extremely decentralized.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    410 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the four philosophers you will catch that many have slight similarities but if you pay close attention you’ll catch that one detail they seem to focus on that brings their whole way of thinking and building a new system back down to nothing, and would cause an arguement or even a riot on how they saw things and wanted them to stand without a consequence or someone to stand up against it . For example Hobbes had some real good ideas and had a good point in his way of making a government work but all in all he decided to focus on theories other than the natural rights he had brought up before such as, life, liberty, and property which in reality they were just some valued thinkers giving valued reason like science, religion, and tolerance.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli And Hobbes Political Power Essay

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kimberley Moran 150722990 BF190 Dr. Charles Wells October 11th, 2015 Machiavelli and Hobbes: A Critical Analysis of Political Power Throughout this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes’ views and approaches to human nature, through analyzing their opinion on political power; how one should rule their state, and enlightenment. Although Machiavelli and Hobbes both wanted someone to be in political power, their approaches to this objective along with their views on morality, human nature and enlightenment were vastly different. When discussion political power, Hobbes argues that without somebody in power, we as people will return to our state of nature and go on to behave horribly to each other to ensure our own survival. “If any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Research Paper

    1622 Words  | 7 Pages

    The State – is a great and mighty power, a kind of “Mortal God” reigns supreme over people and towering above them. Naturally, creating his philosophy, Hobbes did not assume that the components of his theory will have a big socio-political impact on our society and for instance will be used for the purpose of US global domination. It is quite obvious that the ideologists of absolutism in the US, deriving their knowledge, including the doctrine of Hobbes, distribute power and interest “of American sovereign” in many regions of the world. Such rights are

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Absolute Monarchy

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes proposed that the ideal government should be an absolute monarchy as a direct result of experiencing the English Civil War, in which there was internal conflict between the parliamentarians and the royalists. Hobbes made this claim under the assumption that an absolute monarchy would produce consistent policies, reduce conflicts and lower the risk of civil wars due to the singular nature of this ruling system. On another hand, John Locke counters this proposal with the view that absolute monarchies are not legitimate as they are inconsistent with the state of nature. These two diametrically opposed views stem from Hobbes’ and Locke’s different understandings of human nature, namely with regard to power relationships, punishment, and equality in the state of nature. Hobbes’ belief that human beings are selfish and appetitive is antithetical with Locke’s contention that human beings are intrinsically moral even in the state of nature, which results in Locke’s strong disagreement with Hobbes’ proposed absolute monarchy.

    Read More

More about Machiavelli Vs Hobbes Research Paper

Open Document