According to Machiavelli, “One morning he assembled the people and senate of Syracuse, as if he had to discuss with them things relating to the Republic, and at a given signal the soldiers killed all the senators and the richest of the people; these dead, he seized and held the princedom of that city without any civil commotion” (Machiavelli, 1515, p. 38). In other words, this shows that intelligence and skill are important to be a leader; however, it is not necessary to be cruel just because fortune was not the reason why the person became a prince. My idea is that if a prince is intelligence he will not rush during difficult times, and he will decide what to do for his state and citizens carefully. In addition, the skills that he has will help him with the army during wars. Therefore, he will be able to end up the disorder that surrounded his
Machiavelli emphasises the importance of being armed, which is a stark contrast to Lao Tzu’s idea of an effective ruler abandoning all arms and violence. According to Machiavelli, familiarising oneself with military matters keeps not only the ruler and his power safe, but also his country. A ruler should constantly be alert and anticipate attack so that he may be well prepared for when an enemy should strike. Will this then guarantee the safety and stability of a country? As controversial as Machiavelli’s rhetoric may be, this is undoubtedly the more practical method, and it is clear that it is one that is still applied today.
Machiavelli influences the modern political science we still use today, and continue to pathe his paths. His book, The Prince uses Renaissance values and applies them to politics, intriguing most everyone. His book targets powerful men, teaching them how to gain and maintain power. “It is not al all necessary for a prince to have all the good qualities which I have named, but it is necessary to seem to have them” (Machiavelli). Although Machiavelli gained his power, not every man can, so Machiavelli is saying that in order to become an idol, you just have to project the idea of power.
Consequently, Machiavelli gathered, the ruler needs to get a decent notoriety while really doing whatever wrong appears vital in the circumstances. Along these lines, rulers must appear to be liberal while using their cash shrewdly, seem, by all accounts, to be empathetic while managing their armed forces cold-bloodedly, and act with incredible clever while developing a notoriety for integrity. Despite the fact that it is alluring to be both adored and dreaded by one's subjects, it is hard to accomplish both, and of the two, Machiavelli pronounced, it is far more secure for the ruler to be
Machiavelli influences the modern political science we still use today, and continue to pave his paths. His book, The Prince uses Renaissance values and applies them to politics, intriguing most everyone. His book targets powerful men, teaching them how to gain and maintain power. “It is not al all necessary for a prince to have all the good qualities which I have named, but it is necessary to seem to have them” (Machiavelli). Although Machiavelli gained his power, not every man can, so Machiavelli is saying that in order to become an idol, you just have to project the idea of power.
Machiavelli Machiavelli was and continues to be one of the most influential figure in politics. His most famous and widely studied book was The Prince. The Prince depicted Machiavelli’s thoughts on how one obtains and sustains authority, as well as inspiring excellence in future leaders. The problem for some readers is that his methods are perceived to be unorthodox and evil; Machiavelli is a realist and sees the world not as it should be, but how it is. He also believes that the world doesn 't reward those who follow rules, and that political actions should not be limited by morality: basically, humans inherently value nationalism and security which rely on moral flexibility.
“The Prince,” explains the political struggles of being ruled by callous leaders and power battles. “The Prince was written to show leaders how to gain and keep the power in government.” In his book, Machiavelli insists that leaders use any means needed to hold their political power. Even if it meant that the leader had to be cruel,
In contrast, Machiavellian traits seem to be contradictory to what Caesar values as a quality of a good leader. In Machiavelli’s masterpiece, The Prince, claims that a leader must be a miser rather than being an indulgent leader. (Machiavelli 8). Caesar was never a miser through out the play; he was very compassionate to the poor. Moreover, Caesar’s lavish attitude accelerated the feeling of detestation among the senators, including the members of the conspirators.
In addition, Machiavelli didn 't take the traditional route for supporting his argument of advice. He didn 't bother using any ethical or philosophical principles as the base for his advice he was trying to give. Instead, he used his own political program on real-life examples as his foundation to his treatise. Which is probably one of the reasons why "The Prince" got so much negative criticism. Machiavelli is practically stepping out of line by explaining what a prince should or should not do in pursuit of his
Machiavelli upholds that fear of a ruler is essential for the successful maintenance of a political order and that a prince should actively seek to cultivate an image of fear to maintain his power. According to Machiavelli, “when the prince is with his armies and has a multitude of soldiers under his government, then it is above all necessary not to care about a name for cruelty because without this name he never holds his army united or disposed to any action" (Machiavelli 67). Machiavelli promotes rulers practicing cruelty because it inspires fear in a ruler. Essentially, This fear makes his subjects easier to control because they fear the retribution the ruler may bring down upon them for disobeying one of his laws or