A ruler may want to be favorable among his subjects and be considered a good ruler, but at maintaining power and peace in the kingdom is top priority. When no leadership in a nation is present, men 's natural inclinations rears its ugly head, resulting in more
It also describes the characters of the Duke because he is obsessed with being in control. The Duke reveals his manipulative characteristics through the poem. The poem is composed of several terms and phrases that describe the Dukes personality, and his views about officiousness. He is obviously overly confident, and believes that his Duchess should worship his every move. According to him, the Duchess did not treat the Duke with the respect that he wished, and, consequently, he gave orders to kill her.
He argues that a good and strong princedom is one that can sufficiently battle out with any military power in the battle fields without relaying to allies. A good prince is one with a good war plan and who understands the war terrains. More so, he should not be over generous to his subjects as this may cause greed which may lead to exhaustion of resources. A prince should exhibit a love-fear kind of attributes, as it is better to be feared than loved but should exhibit caution with interfering with his subject 's properties. A prince should keep his words and avoid contradicting aspects in his reign so as to have respect among his subjects.
Watchful: Important to keep an eye on who is trying to overthrow you or take advantage of you. 7. I think a state might be a disastrous if it was ruled under a Machiavellian Ruler. A Machiavellian Ruler is selfish and what I think is narcissistic, so that is why I think it would bad to have rulers like that. Maybe some of the advice Machiavelli gives is true but in the end it 's all had.
Yes, it is nice to be nice, even Machiavelli believes in this point, yet in the world of The Prince, it suffices just to be seen as nice. He defines traditional virtues as the general qualities usually praised by others as good, and these include attributes such as generosity, piety, and compassion. Machiavelli believes that a leader must always appear to be virtuous, but that acting virtuously for just virtue’s sake can even be more detrimental to his state than being stark cold. A prince should not just avoid vices like deceit, cruelty or greed too blatantly, especially if using them will help him benefit his state. He is also quick to point out that these vices should also not only be followed just for the vice in them, and virtue just for the sake of virtue, but must be conceived as means to the desired
In Chapter 17 of The Prince, by Niccolo Machiavelli, his claim is that it is better to be feared than loved. I strongly agree with Machiavelli’s claim because people are generally bad and will have the sense to take over your thrown if they are not feared by you. Additionally, if people are feared by you than they will not have the courage to fight back. In Chapter 17 Machiavelli writes, “…This arose from nothing else than his inhuman cruelty, which, with his boundless valour, made him revered and terrible in the sight of his soldiers, but without that cruelty, his other virtues were not sufficient to produce this effect.” This quote refers back to Machiavelli’s claim that in order to be successful you must endure cruelty in your city and
A moment examination may be made amongst criminal and sacred method for accomplishing power. Here, the primary purpose of contrast is not the expertise and experience of the ruler but rather well known demeanors toward the sovereign. A sovereign who comes to control through wrongdoing runs the most serious hazard since he might be compelled to confer some brutality toward his subjects, jeopardizing himself by reproducing contempt and disdain among the masses. A sacred sovereign, be that as it may, comes to control with the support of either the nobles or ordinary citizens, and his employment comprises basically of keeping the unsupportive gathering happy with his run the show. To entirety up, ability is to be favored over fortune since ability prompts to a more viable ruler who is probably going to gather enduring transcendence.
As portrayed in the Shakespeare’s tetralogy being a king is a sacrificial commitment in which one must be willing to face the obstacles of making only wise decisions, being robbed of at any moment, and losing friendships. Having the ability to make good decisions is imperative to being an effective king. It is expected by his subjects that the king will never make the wrong decision. If the king makes even one unfavorable decisions, he must face the public scrutiny of all of his followers. The king is expected to make
Sir William, on the other hand tries to be friendly with Edgar so that he can extricate political benefit in case the Marquis and his fellow Tories win their struggle for power. Edgar also enters a political partnership with the Marquis thinking that he would be able to offer Lucy something better than a life of poverty and an outcast lord. His fortune takes a good turn when the Tories, guided by the Marquis come to power. Although Edgar does not get involved in party politics like Ashton or the Marquis, yet he becomes intricately involved in their nasty world of political scheming. Throughout the novel, it appears that Edgar is