Claim: Madame Defarge’s view on the aristocrats causes the rage built up inside her to snap and create a storm with intentions to harm those who are wealthy rather than act justifiably. Evidence #1 & Rationale: “It would be easier for the weakest poltroon that lives, to erase himself from existence, than to erase one letter of his name or crimes from the knitted register of Madame Defarge” (132). Madame Defarge’s main job in the Revolution is to knit a list of names of aristocrats she wants the resistant to kill. In this quote Defarge is talking about how Madame Defarge’s knitting controls those people’s lives. They talk about how it would be easier for all the aristocrats to commit suicide rather than take them out one letter at a time after knitting their names. This shows Madame Defarge’s rage because she is angry at the fact that she is stuck knitting names of people she can’t wait to kill and she wants to carry out her plan already. Evidence #2 & Rationale: “But when [an earthquake] is ready, it takes place, and grinds to pieces everything before it” (137). …show more content…
However, Madame Defarge also understands that if the storm is prepare just the right way then it can do the most damage. All this tension is building up inside Madame Defarge just waiting to snap and destroy everything in it’s path. Although Madame is referring to making the storm, she actually is the storm waiting for a trigger to set her off. She is the storm because like a storm she has to be built up over time, and she cannot be created by a single person. Plus, like a storm, once she starts, she can’t stop until she is all out of “fuel” or in her case,
The Secret French War Michael Gregory The affairs of the French over the 18th and early 19th centuries varied widely. However, one theme of international policy remained: secure New France in America. In The French War Against America: How a Trusted Ally Betrayed Washington and the Founding Fathers, Harlow Giles Unger depicts a story of French influence in American politics to obtain their lost lands in America.
In a plot that involved even Governor Tryon, an arrest warrant was issued for Husbands’ because of him being a “principle mover and promotor of the late Riots” (Kars, pg. 188). Furthermore, the wealthy elite used cunning ways to discourage farmers from bringing up petitions. One way that people were persuaded not to bring their grievances to court was because, “officials promised to countersue for “malicious prosecution”” (Kars, pg. 169).
In 1941, Robert Roswell Palmer, a revisionist, was another French Revolutionary historian who wrote about the Terror during the Revolution. Unlike Kerr, Palmer focuses on the individual leaders of the Committee of Public Safety instead of the conflict between the different classes. Besides focusing solely on Robespierre, like Mathiez, he focuses on all twelve leaders. By focusing on the revolutionary leaders, Palmer’s book, The Twelve Who Ruled is a political and top-down interpretation of the terror during the French Revolution. Palmer’s interpretation is a continuation of Mathiez’s as he also views terror as an instrument of justice that is used to repress and control its citizens.
(chapter 3, page 267). Characterization/ Attitude: This is interesting for it reveals Madame Defarge’s motives have shifted from the aristocracy itself, to killing the entire bloodline of the Evermonde family. Madame Defarge makes it very clear when she confesses to Lucie that she is hungry for obtaining revenge for the unbearable crime committed. Madame Defarge is looking to justify and punish the responsible by taking matters into her own hands in her attempt to right the wrongs. 6.
In the second part of the novel All the Light We Cannot See, a prominent theme is rebellion because of what Madame Manec and some of her close friends that live in Saint-Malo have planned to do against the German soldiers and have found other ways to communicate what has been happening in France with perhaps other countries. Madame Manec, before her death, asked Marie-Laure and Etienne “Do you know what happens, Etienne”… “when you drop a frog in a pot of boiling water?” … “It jumps out. But do you know what happens when you put the frog in a pot of cool water and then slowly bring it to a boil? You know what happens then?...
Seventeenth-century France’s justice system takes into account both financial and religious influences. The rules of the Catholic Church affect the character of the people, imploring them to tell the truth. This directly impacts Bertrande and her marriage. The action of forging one’s identity also causes legal ramifications. Society charges that Bertrande actually has a realization that Arnaud were, in fact, an impostor from the very beginning.
The way it was used by the anti-Dreyfusards made it a central social factor in the Affair.5 For example, the anti-Dreyfusards were largely anti-Semitic and realised that as an ideology, it infiltrated almost every layer in French society, they thus saw a chance to rally a collective consciousness towards their cause and strengthen themselves against their Dreyfusard opposition.6 This surge of anti-Semitism also presented a foundation upon which nationalists, of whom many were anti-Dreyfusards, could create a new mass movement to the Right or demonstrate their refusal to accept the social and political values of the Republic.7 Similarly, the Affair gave anti-Semitic intellectuals like Éduoard Drumont the opportunity to thrive and consequently we see the importance of anti-Semitism on a social level. In embedding within La Libre Parole anti-Semitic ideologies, Drumont ensured a large anti-Semitic presence in the popular press. In exposing France to these feelings, people were more likely to adopt this mentality.
In Candide, Voltaire discusses Cunegonde, Paquette, and the Old Woman and the exploitation the women faces during the 18th century. They were raped and was sexually exploited regardless of being from a well to do family or from a royal home. These female characters have very little importance in Candide. With the way Voltaire characterized Cunegonde, Paquette, and the Old Woman, Voltaire draws our attention to gender roles and the incompetence of women in the 1800s. These women were all natural survivors in my view.
In the novel “A Tale of Two Cities” written by Charles Dickens, we find that several characters have strong ideals and are driven to take the path that they do. Dickens gives credible motivation to each of his characters to explain why the characters are doing the thing that they are. Two characters with exceptionally strong drive throughout the story are Miss Pross and Madame Defarge. Miss Pross is a symbol of love in the story and we find that all of her love and dedication is driven by Lucie. On the contrary, Madame Defarge is a symbol of hate and that is derived from the horrendous things that the Evrémonde brothers had committed to her family.
In her 1975 article, “Feminism in the French Revolution,” Jane Abray provides a dismissive view of women’s movements during the Revolution. In the article, Abray emphasizes the failures of revolutionary feminism. In her opinion, the most compelling reason for revolutionary feminism’s failure was that it was a minority interest that remained inaccessible to the majority of French women who accepted their inferior status to men. Abray suggests additional reasons for the movement’s “abject failure,” including its inability to garner support from the male leaders of the Revolution, the disreputable characters of the feminist leaders, the strategic errors made by the movement’s leaders, and a “spirit of the times” that emphasized the nuclear family
Because Madame Defarge fails to follow this theme, she ends up dying after she gets into a fight with Miss Pross, who is Lucie’s governess. Madame Defarge fails to “cleave no faith, where faith brings blood”,
(Dickens, p.276) It was a symbol of a freedom, a symbol of captivity, a sign of hope, a sign of despair, a representation of a revolution, a representation of demoralization, a shift towards the light, a plunge towards the utter darkness. It was the Guillotine, brought to the spotlight by thousands of starving, desperate, hopeless people. Openly, it claimed to be the avenue for absolute freedom for France, but in honesty this machine touted the fall of morality. The French peasants took the power over the upper classes in order to break free from their starvation and mistreatment. Through the workings of Madame Guillotine, the peasants eliminated their offenders:
Lizabeth is full of regret and anger after attacking Miss Lottie that she decides to take it out on hard work, “ I had indeed lost my mind, for all the smoldering emotions of that summer swelled in me and burst-the great need for my mother who was never there, the hopelessness of our poverty and degradation, the bewilderment of being neither child nor woman and yet both at once, the fear unleashed by my father's tears. And these feelings combined in one great impulse toward destruction. I leaped furiously into the mounds of marigolds and pulled madly, trampling and pulling and destroying the perfect yellow blooms (286).” Lizabeth’s anger towards the world and herself finally boiled over and she decided to take her anger out
" In this quote, the author is saying that a storm, real or emotional, can 't be controlled even if it can be predicted. Both the meanings relate to the title in that storm warnings are
John Fowles’s The French Lieutenant’s Woman came to light in June 1969. It is clear that the novel tackles motifs such as love and intrigue, prototypical themes of the Victorian Novel. However, Fowles’s ultimate motive was not that of writing a conventional Victorian story but that of revealing an experimental narrative in which Victorian elements are explored from a perspective of the late sixties. Fowles presents us with a new reading of 1867, incorporating references of many of the events that took place during that gap of time.