In my opinion the president should be allowed certain powers in order to run the country properly, he is also the leader of the country which grants him the right to have certain powers according to the constitution. With that being said our modern presidents have been given more power than they need and more than they know what to do with causing issues throughout the country and the world. Modern presidents have the power of total destruction, they have the power to manipulate, and their power affects everyone and is not formally given to them. Presidents today have the informal
That's the President we need and also a President who can give out warnings to us. Like when there is a big emergency and nobody knows it we aren't just going to stand there and pretend like nothing bad is going to happen. Our next President Will give us warnings even if it's late or early or in the last minute but he/she will tell us. We also need a President who we can feel safe around that actually cares for us who wouldn't choose money over all of us. A President who can show us that we can live in peace and not have to worry about “ohh he's racist” or “he only cares about the money and not us”.Instead of that we need to say “he stood up for us” or “he's a President that wouldn't let us down even for money”.
This of course is predicated on the belief that the public’s opinion will influence the actions of their representatives in Congress since representatives want to be reelected. In modern use, particularly with television and looser campaign finance regulations, Presidents now are more sending a message to party leadership or interest groups, letting them either take up the issue in Congress or mobilize the people. Of the powers a President has, the power of influence; especially in modern, media-driven society, is paramount. Although another aspect of Presidential power is the idea of executive privilege, or being able to keep all conversations the President has private. This is perhaps one of the more controversial powers given to the President because it begs the question of how a President can be held responsible if the people don’t know what they are doing?
When Thoreau states in his opening line “that government is best which governs not at all” it sounds like the motto of the modern day Republican Party. Someone who refuses to pay taxes because of the actions of the government. For Thoreau it was the Mexican-American War and slavery. Today, it could be a Republican not wanting to pay taxes because the government will waste it on Obamacare or some welfare program. What is ironic is that Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” for much of the 19th century was ignored.
Constitution). The fabrication of this system allows for the equilibration of powers and fair governing of the people by maintaining interest in the good of the people as a whole. For instance, Richard Nixon’s veto of the War Powers Resolution allowed him to dismiss the approval of Congress to officially declare war and to send troops to participate in the Vietnam War; fortunately, Congress was able to override his veto within a few months later (Glass). Since the three branches have divided powers the government was able to prevent Nixon’s abuse of power and granted the government to successfully perform democracy by not continuing the Vietnam War for the wellbeing of the people (Glass). Through the system of checks and balances it states “The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war.
One argument made by Senator Robert M. La Follette was “I think all men recognize that in time of war the citizen must surrender some rights for the common good which he is entitled to enjoy in time of peace. But, sir, the right to control their own Government according to constitutional forms is not one of the rights that the citizens of this country are called upon to surrender in time of war.” He does not agree with taking away the right of free speech. There was a cartoon drawn that states “Swat the Fly but Use Common Sense.” This cartoon shows that we wanted to win the war, but we should not take away the important rights of the citizens. There was a Japanese citizen of the United States named Korematsu. He was born in the United States, but his parents were born in Japan.
On 1796, George Washington’s Farewell Address states to future governments of, “...They serve to organize faction… The great rule of conduct for us to regard to foreign nations… to have little political connection as possible…” (Doc D) George Washington’s Farewell Address was a speech given to advice the future of the nation. George Washington's advice two things and one of them was no separate parties only as one. As the other was that nation of America should only focus on themselves rather than having political allies with foreign countries. Leading that foreign countries would be the downfall of America due it is the reason of leading a newborn into war. Meaning that America should only focus on themselves while they are still being built into a nation.
We will talk about how the g-word birth and the development of the g-word. First let us talk about the legend of America history: Henry David Thoreau. He is the first person that raised the theory of civil disobedience. In his mind, he think that people should had their own mind and they should had their own view so everyone’s mind should not be same. But at that time government had limited their mind and force or control their thinking to vote.
Congressmen aren’t elected through a slate of people voted by citizens to vote for citizens, so why is the president? If the government is truly to be by the people, why can this happen? If the answer is, it isn’t, that’s not the way the founders intended it, then we shouldn’t use a hastily created system made by people who came from a time when the common man was illiterate. It was a system created because the founders believed that the average person couldn’t truly be trusted electing the leader, so they created a system to separate their decisions from how the president is picked. Whether or not the founders were
Edwards and Wattenberg define Federalism as, “a way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government share formal authority over the same area and people. (Edwards and Wattenburg,70)” When the United States first started to form a central government their objective was to never allow for a dominating power to take over the country again. To do so they created a division of power and made it possible for states and more so the “people” the right to have more of an impact on government. Or so were their intended thoughts when creating the constitution and the branches. In doing so their focus constrained national government but left a loose string as to what the states and their constitutions could do.
The introduction to the Declarations tone of the first paragraph is forward and direct about anger of a dispute to a major argument. The authors avoid specifying the conflict between Britain and the Americans because they wanted to announce that they wanted to separate from the British Empire, they wanted to give just that specific detail about them leaving the empire. They refer to “one People” as the Colonists and the Congress, the people who apposed the British rule. Some who were not loyalists to the king, those who were in Continental Congress and all “Americans” were considered “one People”. “They” and “them” are referring
Well, in the second paragraph in the Declaration of Independence, it states: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,” but, this doesn’t mean that we can just revolt. There has to be a logical reason, and just not agreeing with the president does not call for a revolution. Even our founding fathers knew that when they wrote this historical document. I think that although people don’t always agree with the president, it doesn’t mean that they have the right to call for revolution, and it certainly doesn’t give them the right to hurt those who support him. But, those who do support him, need to work on explaining it to those who don’t and they have to learn not to hurt those who support Clinton.
The people thought that they were all ruled by England so they didn 't have to follow the tax. When this happened a meeting was called with the 13 colonies and the British government because they weren 't being heard. The British government would shut down the Bostok Port. The colonists now thought that they didn 't have to or want to pay taxes because they thought they were not part of England. All this shows that the economics was a big part of driving the American
Knowledge is undeniably important to everyone in the world, and especially to a political leader, like James Madison. Containing knowledge of failed governments or tyrannical dictators is useful in preventing future governments that are synonymic in comparison. Madison had the knowledge that a monarchy was not to majority of the colonists’ liking, which allowed for him to make the conscious choice, backed up by knowledge, to form a government that was revolutionary and beneficial. James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and the other composers of the Declaration of Independence acquired the knowledge, from personal experiences, that the United States should have different laws and civil liberties than what was given in England. James Madison, with
Articles of Confederation Essay The Articles of Confederation was the original United States Constitution. The articles were written and agreed on by delegates of the states, but it still did not do it’s job and many people were frustrated with it. They chose this as their first system of government to keep the states together as a nation, but let the states have their own equal governments. After just ending a war against Britain, the United States knew they could not have a national government that was too strong, as the British had. This led to the Articles of Confederation which gave most of the powers traditionally held by the national government to the states.