Intro “Freedom is never granted; it is won. Justice is never given; it is exacted.” This quote by A.Philip Randolph is brought to life by and applies greatly to Mahatma Gandhi, an Indian man who dedicated his life to obtaining his country's independence from British rule. He fought for his country’s freedom and in acquiring it, obtained justice. Ghandi used many methods to achieve this, including leading nonviolent protests, civil disobedience and negotiation with British authorities. This article provides evidence of the strong relationship between Randolph’s quote and Gandhi's actions Body Gandhi believed that he would not be granted freedom by the British authorities, instead, freedom would have to be won through collective efforts of the …show more content…
This is true in relation to Gandhi. He suffered personally such as being imprisoned. Some followers paid the ultimate sacrifice for their devotion to their country’s independence and their allegiance to Gandhi. During one of Gandhi’s protests in Amritsar, British soldiers were ordered to open fire on the group of 20,000 in the crowd. More than 400 people were killed and over 1,000 …show more content…
Gandhi proved this through his efforts and struggles. He was a master of negotiation and used this skill to achieve independence. He believed that negotiation was an essential part of any conflict resolution strategy and that it could be used to reach mutually beneficial agreements between conflicting parties. One of Gandhi's most significant negotiations with the British was the Gandhi-Irwin Pact of 1931. This agreement was the result of several rounds of talks between Gandhi and the Viceroy of India, Lord Irwin. The pact provided for the release of political prisoners, the suspension of the salt tax, and the recognition of the Indian National Congress as a political organisation. Ghandi’s talks were not limited to formal meetings with British officials. He also used his influence to mobilise public opinion and pressure the British to make compromises. In addition to his negotiations with the British, Gandhi also negotiated with leaders of other political and religious groups in India. He believed that a united society was essential for the success of the independence movement and worked tirelessly to build coalitions with leaders from diverse
Starting in the 1870s, countries in Africa such as Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and India, Vietnam, in Asia were being colonized by the British. In order to gain their independence back they took non-violent and militant actions. Though both strategies were successful one was more successful that the other. Non-violent actions were successful in peacefully getting the countries independence. In document 1, a letter written by Mahatma Gandhi to lord Irwin in 1930 before marching to the sea and breaking the British Salt Tax he states, “Even the salt the peasants must use to live is so taxed as to make the burden fall heaviest on him…
Mahatma Gandhi also wanted Indian independence from the British. He wanted everyone to treat each other like brothers and sisters no matter what religion they had. All in all, he wanted equality, freedom, peace, and love. • WHAT was his vision?
In 1922, Gandhi was sentenced to 6 years in prison for sedition. When the court allowed Gandhi to plea, he did not defend himself and he said that he is guilty as charged and will take the most severe punishment. This shows that Gandhi stood up for what he believed in and was able to accept his consequences.
He led a giant protest which consisted of marching near the ocean and picking up salt, due to the British banning of domestic salt, even though India had a surplus. He is considered a major individual in the independence movement for India. He also strived for peace between Muslims and Hindus. Document 9 tells us Gandhi’s impact on global history. His ideas of civil disobedience were used in areas like the Philippians, Eastern Europe, Ghana, and China.
Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.
It is out of the selfless act of heroes and heroines of civil disobedience such as Mahatma Gandhi that the society is enjoying the fruits today. This speech is going to demonstrate how civil disobedience has played roles in social reforms, containing unjust rulings
Consequently, those protesting an issue must work to bring about change earnestly through truly believing in their cause. Henry David Thoreau shared this sentiment in his “Civil Disobedience”, writing that one person who maintains their beliefs can change the world “For it matters not how small the beginning may seem to be: what is once done well is done forever.” Though while not all peaceful protests are successful enough to inspire true change, many of today’s free societies were inspired by those that did. Mohandas K. Gandhi was able to coerce the South African Boer government to “end the most objectionable parts of the registration law” and convince the British to grant India its independence from Britain”(Gandhi and Civil DIsobedience”). Therefore, it only takes one individual to inspire a change in the world because “Without their courage those injustices would never have received the attention required to compel national action” (“Civil Discourse and Petitioning”).
He established a religious retreat where people could join him and purified his life. Gandhi felt that India’s self respect was tied to independence. Gandhi achieved his goal of gaining independence by civil disobedience, going to jail, and not seeing the British as the
Gandhi convinced the Indians that he could get them their independence. They would get their independence long as they didn't cooperate. Gandhi used a couple of lines from the Declaration of Independence that in other words meant, “if a law is unjust, then it is not a law.” Gandhi also told his people that in order to pretext they had to be willing to get jail time. Gandhi's methods worked because both his people and him were uncooperative.
When the British began taxing salt and not allowing Indians to manufacture and collect their own salt, Gandhi stepped in and wrote a letter to the British governor of India. He was determined to show the British what wrongs they have done to India and to convert them through nonviolence (Doc 1.) Even when Gandhi was in jail, he inspired his followers to march without the use violence. None of his followers fought back even when they were beaten (Doc 4.) Being in jail for a total of 2,338 days, he “never felt the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box.”
Gandhi helped the government in a variety of different ways to gain status for Indians and have promises the prime minister promised to India to be granted, but nothing was fulfilled, and promises were not made. To speak this, lie the minister and government have delivered to India, he stated, “I fought for cooperation and working with the Montag Chelmsford reforms, hoping the prime minister would redeem his promise…the Khilafat promise was not redeemed” (Gandhi 30-31). Out of his good nature, he helped the prime minister so he could fulfill the promise that he made to India, but it was deemed useless because the promise was never redeemed which shows the major discrimination against Indians. Exposing this problem would fuel people in India to initiate change. Gandhi has always wanted to have change within the government.
Could anyone be freed from the mighty British Empire? In the early 1900s, a new movement was starting in India which wanted to do just this, however through non-violence. Although non-violence was unheard of in the Western World this belief in India attracted everyone regardless of sex or religion. At the center of this movement, Mohandas Gandhi, a British educated lawyer, campaigned for non-violence through passive resistance. Passive Resistance was a means of disobedience through non-violence.
Gandhi's determination was seen when he did not stop protesting even after he was sent jail for it . “Gandi would spend 2338 days in jail” (Document C) from this quote we can see that nothing would stop Gandhi from getting India its independence. Every time Gandhi got out of jail he continued to break laws he viewed as unfair as well continue to protest. Gandhi showed the most determination to free India when he went on the salt march. “Before embarking on civil disobedience and taking a risk I have dreaded to take all these years… I do not intend to harm a single englishmen… even though they might do the greatest wrong to me and mine”(Document A).
Through Gandhi’s “desire” (line 63) to avoid “unnecessary embarrassment” (line 63), he demonstrates his compassion for the English which is best exemplified by his “equal love” (line 21) for the British and Indians. Beyond compassion, Gandi desires friendships between the two nations with “independence” (line 35) for India and “friendly negotiations” (line 32) once independence is reached. However, his tone also shows clear disgust for the “cruel monopoly” (line 56) from the British. Gandhi’s message of independence for India through non-violence was prevalent through both his tone of compassion and
Gandhi always made sure that they kept the movement nonviolent. They had meetings on how they were going to approach the movement, they were organized and had a plan. Gandhi got many of his ideas and principles through reading the bible, reading the Bhagavad Gita, and writers like Henry David Thoreau. Gandhi and the Indian people created some dilemmas to throw the British government off balance. Gandhi told the Indian people to boycott all British goods and only buy Indian goods.