Mahatma Gandhi once said “There is a higher court than courts of justice and that is the court of conscience. It supersedes all other courts.” One key term in Gandhi’s statement is justice, which means the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law. Another key term in Mahatma Gandhi’s statement is conscience, which means the sense of moral goodness in a person’s character that makes him or her feel an obligation to do right. Taken as a whole, Gandhi means that unlawful behavior is acceptable when a person’s actions are for a greater good. Furthermore, Gandhi implies in his statement that when the criminal justice system fails to provide righteousness, taking the unjust situation upon him or herself is valid. Finally, when looked under the Lens of William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Mahatma Gandhi’s statement can be proven true through Shakespeare’s use of conflict between Brutus and his honor.
Firstly, Shakespeare’s portrayal of conflict demonstrates that Mahatma Gandhi’s declaration is verifiable. For example, Brutus battles with his honor at his house after
…show more content…
By doing so, this helps to prove that Mahatma Gandhi’s statement is true. Similarly, in 1955, where racism was especially prominent, a courageous woman named Rosa Parks performed an illegal act. She refused to give up her seat in the colored section of the bus to a white person. As a result, she was arrested and spent a day in jail. Rosa Parks changed an immoral law in order do live in an equal world. Despite her actions being criminal during that time period, she is a role model for society. What must be taken away from this analysis is that moral duty trumps the criminal justice system because, in the end, people are the ones that have to live with their
Everyone has experienced pain, but we all deal with it differently. Some people try to avoid experiencing pain, for they are scared; while others accept their punishment and agony. Moral people tolerate their pain and trauma by making their traumatic experience meaningful and important. They learn from their punishment and try to provide insight. In the stories of Antigone and Boycott, Letter From Birmingham Jail, righteous people fought for their beliefs without violence and dealt with their suffering without hesitation.
Another example of this would be the outright discrimination Gandhi faced on his way to South Africa. As Gandhi was riding the train to South Africa, the train attendee told Gandhi that he had to move from his first-class seat and sit in third class. When Gandhi told the man that he was an attorney and always traveled first class, the attendant laughed and told him that there were no colored attorneys. Even when Gandhi was given the option to move to the third class seating, Gandhi stayed and stuck with what he believed in. As a result, Gandhi was kicked off the train.
Throughout his letters, sermons, and other writings, Martin Luther King, Jr. expresses the idea that one has a moral obligation to disobey an unjust law – most notably in his “Letter From Birmingham Jail.” King also conveys the idea that change must be demanded, and not waited for by the oppressed. Additionally, Michael Sandel describes Aristotle’s idea that justice is teleological and honorific in Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? This means that determining whether something is just requires delving into the telos, or true meaning or purpose of that thing.
Right before the start of the boycott, Rosa Parks famously refused to give her seat up to a white man on a bus (http://ow.ly/Yuqbq) .This shows how something as simple as not using public buses can help one gain
Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.
Imagine living in a society in which justice isn’t served. Being arrested for protesting, just on helping other citizens in America get the rights that they deserve. In Martin Luther King’s speech “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel, Dr. King is the most effective in motivating individuals of America to support him in his efforts against injustice or indifference. One of the many rhetorical devices Dr.King uses was parallelism, in which he organized and pointed out his ideas to the audience. In the letter, Dr. King stated “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
Both Civil Disobedience and the Gandhi article are alike based on the fact they both discuss civil disobedience, attending prison, and standing for one’s beliefs. Civil disobedience can be seen as a good thing and a bad thing depending on to what extent one is breaking the laws. Some people may break the law because they feel that it is unfair to them but others break the for the simple fact of doing what they want in order for it to benefit themselves. Laws are meant for the majority which means even if they are not pertaining to certain citizens. Thoreau targeted laws that pertained to him, Gandhi went on strike for the better of his country and people.
Intro “Freedom is never granted; it is won. Justice is never given; it is exacted.” This quote by A.Philip Randolph is brought to life by and applies greatly to Mahatma Gandhi, an Indian man who dedicated his life to obtaining his country's independence from British rule. He fought for his country’s freedom and in acquiring it, obtained justice.
In this essay, two prominent voices are Socrates and Martin Luther King Jr. Socrates presents the law as a universal truth. King argues in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail" that we have a moral duty to disobey unjust laws occasionally. This essay will delve into
Her conviction to the just and fair alone made her career possible, for if she had not been so concerned with morality she would have given up far sooner. What made her so headstrong? Her past, like everyone’s, shaped her significantly.
Therefore this explains the importance of challenging unjust laws to keep government on a small scale by civilians acting as the counter force to balance authority and prevent corruption. Dr. King also supports this when he describes two types of laws that determine when civil disobedience is needed and a responsibility. He advocates, “one has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws” and “a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (King 2). Similar to Antigone she tells Creon about her defying acts, her moral duty and how the “final justice that rules the world below makes no such law” against morals that need to be refuted (Antigone 10). Dr. King and Sophocles both advocate the moral responsibility of
Mohandas Gandhi was a “key figure in the Indian struggle for independence.” He worked to use nonviolent ways to fight for equality and change in India. Gandhi was able to unite many groups and “inspired the common people of India to work for change.” In addition, Gandhi advocated using a more traditional approach (Wadley 202). Although Mohandas Gandhi 's satyagraha campaign caused violence, his advocacy for those who were discriminated against in Indian society led to the initial unification of India to gain independence from Great Britain.
In-Class Essay Practice Rosa Parks once said, “I would like to be remembered as a person who wanted to be free.. So other people would be also free”. Rosa Parks was the Civil Rights Activist , who refused to surrender her bus seat to a white passenger, spurring the Montgomery boycott and other efforts to end segregation. The author of this speech, Oprah Winfrey, shows how thankful she is, and how Rosa Parks change the world through her eulogy. To remember her life to change our world, Oprah Winfrey delivers eulogy for Rosa Parks.
Political activists and philosophers alike have a challenging task of determining the conditions under which citizens are morally entitled to go against the law. Socrates and Martin Luther King, Jr. had different opinions on the obligation of the citizens in a society to obey the law. Although they were willing to accept the legal punishment, King believed that there are clear and definable circumstances where it would be appropriate, and sometimes mandatory, to purposely disobey unjust laws. Socrates did not. Socrates obeyed what he considered to be an unjust verdict because he believed that it was his obligation, as a citizen of Athens, to persuade or obey its Laws, no matter how dire the consequences.
Mohandas Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869, in what is now the Indian state of Gujarat. Also known as Mahatma, a title of respect which means “Great Soul” in Sanskrit – the language of Hinduism and Buddhism, he was the child of a minister; his mother was a devoted practitioner of Vaishnavism – an ascetic religion governed by the tenets of self-discipline and nonviolence. According to Gandhi, to act out against a law that was unjust or immoral was an act of civil disobedience. In order for resistance to be civil, Gandhi set forth certain criteria that had to be met including (1)