Before all school districts think about mainstreaming students, they need to consider all the factors. If a child is not placed correctly, then the child will not succeed. Not only the child, but the teacher needs to be properly trained and adapted to a more individualized curriculum. Throughout this paper, you will see how special education still needs to be a factor in mainstreamed schools. We will see how mainstreaming can be beneficial and how it is not just the setting that encourages socialization. Taking into consideration the 14 disabilities under the
IDEA act (Individuals with disabilities education act), we see that there is a lot to consider with inclusion. Socialization is important in all student’s lives and mainstreaming can be
…show more content…
Introduction
Mainstreaming: The need to Improve
There have been many studies throughout education systems in our world that suggest that mainstreaming is beneficial as it provides alternative avenues for children with disabilities to
MainstreamingMAINSTREAMING 3
Since the early sixties, mainstreaming has been sparking an interest within the community. The Civil Rights movements helped by focusing on the right of the individual and helped progress individual rights forward. In 1975, the government passed “Education for All
Handicapped Children Act”, which stated that all handicapped children are entitled to a "free and appropriate" education in the "least restrictive environment . . .” (Mainstreaming, 2007).
Throughout dictionaries and encyclopedias, one can see the word disabled as meaning weak, or helpless. (Insert chart)
Mainstreaming is the practice of teaching disabled children in regular classrooms with non-intellectually impaired students to the fullest possible extent. (Mainstreaming, 2007) This is also called Inclusion, and it has worked well for special education students who are able to be within a classroom setting which can help them be better prepared socially for the
…show more content…
Certain children with more severe disabilities are more than likely better off within a special education classroom as their needs will be met more accurately.
Special Education
The role of Special Education is to ensure that students with disabilities are successful within schools like their peers and ready for life after school. “Special education is specially designed instruction, support, and services provided to students with an identified disability MAINSTREAMING 4 requiring an individually designed instructional program to meet their unique learning needs”
(DoDEA, 2014), This ensures that the student will meet their fullest potential. Special Education is not always necessary as some students with disabilities can be integrated into the normal classroom if it is evaluated by the parents and a school representative as possible and more than likely an aid would be within the classroom as well.
Special education was started after World War II when parents began to organize groups to support the American Association on Mental Deficiency whose first convention was in 1947.
As the support began to expand, new acts within legislation helped improve the education
1. What is the issue that the author(s) of this chapter has presented? The issue the author presents in chapter nine focuses on who should receive special education services and how should educators identify which students are to receive special education services. 2.
Some people argue special education segregates the students. Having access to educational services isn’t enough. There are different views on the implication of special education, but emphasizing individual educational benefits for all students is a worthy
Knowing their needs is important to adapt the practices and to respect them as individuals. According to the author (Raymond, 2012), the perception of the students about the services they receive determine the outcome of the education efforts. For that, the teachers ' role is to guarantee that the student does not feel inferior, unequal, wich would be the negative conotation of the special education placement (Raymond, 2012). Instead of focusing on their difficulties, teachers should focus on reducing the gaps with more inclusive
Bryant thinks inclusion is a wonderful idea for both students and teachers. Students with disabilities have the opportunity to learn from their non-disable peers. They learn proper social skills such as how to conduct themselves in the classroom environment. Furthermore, regular education students learn to work with and understand that students with disabilities are people too.
Also, other students would not have opportunity to have a friendships different from those that they already have. Special needs students should be working towards the same academic standards as social goals students of their same age yet with instructional supports and accommodations and modifications as needed (p. 1 IRIS). Excluding them from the general education classrooms could also make it so the students is less likely to perform well on assessments because they have had significantly less exposure to its
The inclusive practice enables all of the students (with or without disabilities) to indulge in same class and learn together in the same class and context. Inclusive practices may refer to the idea of amalgamation of individuals with disabilities with the individuals without disabilities and having no pity for them or any other feeling that make them feels their disability. This is quite an ethical, social and educational question whether it should be done and if yes then how and why it is to be carried out (Lindon,
Still, special education is one responsibility that we cannot afford to get wrong. Instruction can play a significant part in their prospective outcomes. Therefore we need to develop a well-defined philosophy regarding special education that considers the laws, your beliefs, and feelings related to working with students with exceptionalities. To become a better educator, I have developed my own personal philosophy with those considerations
“The term “inclusion” replaced all previous terminologies, i.e., integrated special education; reverse mainstreaming, previous to the early 1990s in hopes that the word would mean more than placing children with special needs in the regular educational classroom, including a sense of belonging, social relationships, and academic development and learning.” (Odom, Buysse, & Soukakou,
Special education is a discipline marked by a lot of controversy and which elicits a heated debate among education administrators, parents, and teachers. Full inclusion, which is the belief that disabled students should be incorporated into regular classrooms, regardless of whether they meet conventional curricular standards or not, is the major point of controversy. Full inclusion embraces the idea that disabled students should undertake regular education and only be excluded in a class when important services cannot be offered to them (Nelson, Palonsky, & McCarthy, 2010). This paper seeks to delve into the arguments surrounding full inclusion and establish their validity. It will achieve this by highlighting the arguments for and against
The transition from primary to post-primary education is one of the most drastic of those changes, and schools need to be equipped to accommodate that transition. For special educational needs, many steps need to be taken in order to familiarize both parties with the conditions they live with and how success can be met. In order for students to feel comfortable and make the transition as smooth as possible, there are many things that schools can do to ensure this success. In order for special education pupils to succeed, schools need to create inclusion in the classrooms and with peers, so that SEN pupils can interact with other students and experience real world classroom time. For students with disabilities, schools need to take some necessary steps in order for a beneficial transition to take place.
Now, I realize that a student needing special education does not automatically mean that they will need help with everything and have an extremely difficult time learning. Most of the students I observed did not seem any different than the students not in special education. They just needed extra help in certain subjects. They picked up on the material much more quickly than I had thought they would and were able to do more on their own than I had originally thought. Before this class and project, I also did not think about the fact that students with special needs often stay in the general education classroom as well as working in the special education
Conclusion After spending some time in both the general and special educational classrooms, I found there were similarities and differences between the two for example special needs students received more personalised care than their counterparts in both classrooms. A difference was that the special educational classroom was perhaps more effective at the students developing to their full potential whereas the general classroom would teach them better social and communication skills. In short, they are both great environments for the students to be in despite the differences.
Thus, they will achieve higher grades. Moreover, they will be greatly engaged in the society as they are building bridges with their peers from several backgrounds. On the long run, teachers, parents, and the society as a whole would develop. Students with learning disabilities should be included in the “normal” classroom because it improves their academic performance, social behavior, and communication language. One reason why students with learning disabilities should be in the normal classroom is that inclusion improves their academic performance.
According to UNESCO, inclusive education is a process of addressing and responding to the diverse needs of all children by increasing participation in learning and reducing exclusion within and from education (Nguyet and Ha 2010). Inclusive education is a process of increasing the presence, participation and achievement of all learners (Booth and Ainscow 2002). The process involves mainstreaming children with special educational needs into regular classroom settings, allowing them to learn side by side with their peers without disabilities. Inclusive education implies that children with special educational needs have to attend mainstream schools they would have attended if they did not have a disability. Mainstreaming children with special needs education has a positive impact on both social and academic learning for children with and without special needs (Farrell 2000).
In short, children with disabilities enable the regular teachers to keep always abreast of new development in