Sources of Malaysian Law
Malaysia has been practicing mixed law which includes Customary Law, Common Law and Islamic Law. Three momentous periods in Malaysian history had contributed laws towards Malaysia’s legal system which were the Malacca Sultanate, to the raise of Islam to Asia, then the indigenous culture of British colonial rule introducing a constitutional government and the common law. Most of the laws implied in Malaysia’s legal system is primarily from the common law which can be classified into two, written and unwritten law.
The most essential source of law is the written law. Written law includes the Federal and State Constitutions, Legislation and Subsidiary legislation. Malaysia has 13 states with a written constitution which
…show more content…
Besides the Federal Constitution, the State Constitution is a constitution that is owned by each states to regulate the government of the state. The State Constitutions consists of provision listed in the 8th schedule such as the Ruler, the Executive Council, the legislature and other related subjects like the Legislative Assembly, financial provisions, State employees, and amendment of the Constitution. Next on the list of written law is the Legislations which refers to law that recognized by the Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies. At the federal level, laws are legislated by parliament and by state legislative assemblies at state level. In 1946, laws enacted by Parliament are called Ordinance. After independence in 1957, the laws enacted by Parliament are called Act, while the laws enacted by State Legislative Assemblies are called Enactment and in Sarawak are called Ordinance. If the Parliament or any State Assembly makes a law which is not in its scope of authority with the constitution, the courts can declare that as null and void. Parliament and the State Legislatures are not supreme, hence they have to enact law …show more content…
Unwritten law constitutes local law that is simply that portion of Malaysian law which is not being enacted by Parliament or the State Assemblies and is not found in the written Federal and State Constitutions. It includes English Law, judicial decision and custom law. Part of Malaysian law is English law, which consists of English common law and the rules of equity. This is also a very important source of Malaysian law. Nevertheless, the application of the law is subject for two limitations where it is only applied in the absence of local statutes on particular matters and just certain part of the English law that is suited for local circumstances will be applied. Sections 3(1) and 5(1) of the Civil Law Act 1956 specifically permit the reception of English common law and equity in Malaysia subject to the limitations contained there. English Common Law is mainly made up of non-written laws, which the ones that the precedents had derived from judgments given on real cases by the judges. It can be divided into two which are the English Commercial Law and English Land Law. In section 5(1) of the Civil Law Act 1956 provides that The English Commercial Law is applicable in Peninsular Malaysia except Penang and Malacca as it stood on 7th April 1956 in the absence of local legislation. On the other hand, Section 5(2) of the same act, applies in Penang, Malacca, Sabah and Sarawak as the law
The U.S constitution and NYS constitution are similar regarding separation of powers divided among the executive, legislation and judicial and were the intention of establishing local authorities to protect people ’s right. As Bowman state, state constitution represents the fundamental laws of that state, which provide a set of rules, regulations, and procedures (Bowman 47-48). These constitutions were designed similar to the US, therefore transferring over its strengths and weakness. In NYS constitution, the legislation lies with the senate and assembly, the governor holds the executive power, but it does not specify it judicial roles, except for the court systems (Pecorella and Stonecash 106 and 113).
As seen in Document A, it compares the Articles and the Constitution. For the executive branch, (the Constitution) had president administrators that enforce federal laws while (the Articles) only takes care when the Congress is not there. For the legislative branch, (the Constitution) a bicameral legislature where each state has equal representation in the Senate and each state has proportional representation in the House of Representatives thus fixing the issue of representation for small and large states. The Articles had a unicameral legislature where each state has one vote no matter what population they had which was unfair for the small states. The Constitution had a national court system that hears different cases while the Articles didn’t have that at all.
But on the other hand, the national government does not do everything that needs to be done, states can still do many things, do them differently from other states, and the national government cannot interfere. Federalism was put into the constitution because the Articles allowed the Continental Congress the power to sign treaties and declare war, but failed to
There are many Constitutions in the U.S., all the state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution. I will be writing about both the Maryland and U.S. Constitution, which have many differences and similarities. This essay is about the three similarities and differences of the Maryland and U.S. Constitution that I found. The three differences and similarities are the state constitution is reserved for state government, whereas the U.S. Constitution is reserved for the national government, “They both embody the principles of representative democratic government”, and they are different in length and structure.
The U.S. Constitution fixed the imbalance between the state and national government. It established Congress, which was made up of the U.S. Senate with two representatives
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America. The Constitution is the outline our founding fathers created to describe the nature and functions of government. Its first three articles consist of a doctrine of the separation of powers, which divides the federal government into three branches: the legislative, consisting of Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. The constitution is meant to govern the federal government while the bill of rights is meant to govern the
Madison, the Constitution called for the creation of a federal government with the following three branches which include the legislative, executive, and judiciary. Article I created Congress, the legislative, lawmaking, body. Article II created the office of the President, who executes, or carries out, the laws. Article III created the federal court system that consist of one Supreme Court and other lower courts.
These authorities that the national government should have, were all up to the states to decide under the Articles. With the taking away some of the states rights in the Constitution, Anti-federalists feared that this would leave the states too weak, resulting in more problems. Under the new Constitution, many powers that were now in the government 's hands are: the power to levy and collect taxes, the power to regulate interstate commerce, the government set up a national court system consisting of district, circuit, and a supreme court, the government could enforce laws, there was now a house based on population, and a senate based on equal representation (two votes per state), to amend the Constitution, a ⅔ vote of Congress was needed, and a ¾ vote of the states were needed, and a majority rule was needed to pass bills. These new powers and abilities of the national government helped to create a strong, new
The Constitution is rules for the president and all of the United States politicians to govern by. In the constitution the first part is called the preamble. It states “ we the people in order to form a more perfect union. established justice ensure domestic tranquility. Provide for the common defense ,promote the general welfare and secure the blessings to ourselves and our posterity.
It describes the rights and responsibilities of the government and of all the states as a federal government. A system whereby several states form a unity but remain independent in internal affairs. Since the Constitution came into force in 1789, it has been amended twenty-seven times to meet the changing needs of the maturing nation which is now very different from the eighteenth-century world in which it was created. The ideals of the Constitution are to form one union from all the states. The states work together as one nation but have independent internal laws.
It outlines a plan of government and provides the structure and functioning of the institutions of governments. Constitutions are expressions of popular sovereignty between the government and the governed. It specifies the powers and limitation of power of the government, as well as the right and privileges of citizens that cannot be affected by the government. Also it specified how citizens are allowed to participate in democratic decision making processes that determines public policies. In some ways, Texas Constitution executes these functions well.
The Texas and Maine state constitution are both used to govern their respective states. They both limit government, separation of powers, and also they both have bill of rights that protect the rights of the people. But, in various ways, the documents have key differences that distinguishes one from
The first article of the Constitution says "ALL legislative powers...shall be vested in a Congress." The second article then reads "the executive power...in a President." The third article gives the "judicial power of the United States in one Supreme Court" and "in such inferior Courts as the Congress...may establish."
The branches of government are: (a) The Legislature: makes the law (The People’s Majlis –Article 5 and Article 70(a)) (b) The Executive: implements the law (The President and the independent commissions –Article 6- ) (c) The
Malaysian judiciary refers to the Malaysian court system. It is an independent body separate from the legislative and executive arms of government. The role of courts is to ensure the law and order are followed, that justice is done, and criminals are punished. The head of the judiciary is the Chief Justice.