1 and Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation persuade the Americans of their individual times to protect and serve their nation to the absolute best of their ability by using hard facts and harsh realities. However, they each use their own ways of conveying their message to the individual person, using pathos and ethos. Both compositions are excellent examples of persuasive writing during a time of war in America. Each of these compositions call on the American people to fight for their freedoms and way of life. It is safe to say that without either of these incredibly persuasive pieces, America would look like a much more different country than the one that is so well known
Should the Pledge of Allegiance be mandatory in schools across America? This is a question that flies in the face of people who are patriotic and people who are non-patriotic. Some people feel entitled to the fact that one should be required to do anything or held responsible or accountable for anything. Others may feel that everybody should be required to say the pledge every morning when school starts. Everyone has his or her own opinions about such controversial subjects.
All they wanted was equality. It has also been pointed out that these athletes are using their rights that were fought for. A letter signed by 35 US veterans stated, "Far from disrespecting our troops, there is no finer form of appreciation for our sacrifice than for Americans to enthusiastically exercise their freedom of speech” (A letter from Medium.com). This demonstrates the complex idea of patriotism, where actions such as standing for the flag in order to show respect, can be changed in protests if their justifications are legitimate. Patriotism allows change as long as it is for the benefit of their country and citizens; therefore, the concept of patriotism should accept peaceful protests with the intention to fix injustices.
It’s well encouraged to research what American history is about and how we can apply the Farewell Address into our life by living in peace, exercising our freedom of speech and choice or religions, along with respecting our governments and live in unity to achieve success. The Farewell Address
Throughout the speech, Henry uses words like “we” and “ourselves” to show that he is still with the audience, and not against them. Henry continues on in that same paragraph by using pathos. When he said, "Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself guilty of treason towards my own country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings." He is saying that this is what he needs to do for his God. Henry tries to show the audience a different viewpoint, rather than discrediting their own.
Hello, It is quite comical how we have gotten to the point of which we are now censoring what we can and cannot wear. It is extremely ludacris. The reason I find it both comical and ludacris is because freedom of expression is a human right. The reason I wear the hat is that I am in support of a Conservative President. I support his Pro-Life stance, his call to a return of Traditional values, his defense of the West, his speech on why we must protect Western Values and our Judeo-Christian heritage, his Muslim ban and his support for Israel.
My father’s beliefs apply specifically to the United States of America as well. He believes our country was built on the idea that anyone can come here to make a better life for themselves and we have an obligation to uphold this ability. In conclusion, my father believes it is morally wrong to deport people who are actively participating in society in a positive way, regardless if they are apart of the society legally or not. While I was speaking
The opposite theory, is a defense of purism, which abolishes prejudice by prohibiting some words, opinions or expressions (such as racism, homophobia or sexism), seen as a help for prejudice. I will defend purism, as I strongly believe that pluralism has many negative sides that don’t belong to our modern democracies. Democracy is developed around the idea of a government « of the people, by the people, for the people » (Gettysburg Address by Abraham Lincoln, 1863). Our western societies are in majority democracies. According to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, « Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principle of holding periodic and genuine elections by universal suffrage are essential elements of democracy.
They are conditioned to view themselves as part of their birth-assigned caste: “I'm really awfully glad I'm a Beta, because I don't work so hard. And then we are much better than the Gammas and Deltas” (Huxley 27). The use of the word “we” shows this person views them self as part of Beta family, but not as a individual. The World State does not want people to behave as individuals because they do not want the citizens to have new ideas and thoughts that could could expose the flaws of society. This is also why the World State bans religion since it encourages individuality, “The origin of individuality was religious, and although often ignored or glossed over, in time the idea of human dignity adhering even to the lowest of the low, transformed society from a place of brutality to one in which the relief of suffering has assumed high priority” (Kohl).
Acoding to , Franics Bellany "Americans say the Pledge of Allegiance to affirm their patriotism and show pride and respect for their country." https://www.reference.com/history/americans-say-pledge-allegiance-79e58b0bc31a2bb9?qo=contentSimilarQuestions Since people do the Pleadge of Alligents they respect there country and will contribute to it. Another point is the Pledge of Alligents is also proven to be inportant because other scools preformic. *** The Pledge of Aligents successful because it is done at other schools. Steve Gunn states, "Pledge of Allegiance is a necessary part of children 's education."