Nevertheless, he stuck to this rule and took the financial crisis in stride, minimizing it is as much as realistically possible while still preserving the rights of American citizens. He believed that the public should not be government dependent, and as a result, encouraged the country as a whole to do their part in reducing the national debt. One should not believe he did not do his part though, as he cut federal spending by 43% in an effort to protect Americans’ property rights. A true president for the people, Coolidge’s decisions were always in best interest of the common welfare, something that should always come first in America’s
We Need Free Tuition, Yes we do, How about you? In the article “The Argument for Tuition-Free college”, by American politician and lawyer Keith Ellison, he argues why free tuition is not only necessary but could be beneficial in the long run. Ellison discredits the financial aid system, as well as pointing out the flaws in the economy when it comes to jobs for in lower income degrees. All while , underlining the corruption of the government when it comes to where they spend America’s money.He is speaking directly to the American government, in order to make them see the to fix the high education system, so that higher education is achievable. Keith Ellison posted this on the American Prospect, a political magazine, while he was the representative
In the end, free education is never free as the youths will have to pay back for the tuition with excessive taxes. Also, offering free tuition will lower the value of education, and this will translate to lower productivity in the job market. Human beings tend to value the things that they have worked for and therefore offering the education at zero costs means that the students may never take their studies seriously. The government can also adopt different alternatives to the free education without necessarily hurting the economy. Having so many graduates will impact negatively on the job sector.
To understand why religious freedom has become so controversial, it helps to know what constitutes as religious freedom. The First Amendment states that there will be no law “respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” (First Amendment). This means that the government cannot establish anything considered an official national religion, and they cannot bar the practice of any religion within the United States as long as there is no danger “to others or to society at large” (Boston). Originally written to ensure that the religious persecution in Europe didn’t come to the United States, the First Amendment is “a major reason why the U.S. has managed to avoid a lot of the religious conflicts that have torn so many other nations apart” (“Your Right to Religious Freedom”). That doesn’t mean that the U.S. has been exempt from religious conflict, however, and there are many
With William James’, the idea of eliminating war cannot be completely done away but shouldn’t be sought after. One example he uses is the United States and the civil relationship with Great Britain. Over centuries of trading we've continue to trade with them without major conflict. William James also states that getting rid of war would only be a fantasy of a utopian society. In this situation I would also have to side with William James’ idea of trying to remain as peaceful as possible for the sake of the citizens of any country.
Poverty is defined as the state of being extremely poor.Considering that America is a free, independent, and wealthy nation, the poverty percentage shouldn’t be as high as it is today. The problem emerges from businesses not hiring the needy, which in return causes Americans to be impoverished. In today’s time, the stereotypical proper person to hire is always hired and businesses will not consider the Americans that are struggling . To change this, we should offer more jobs to the impecunious people and donate more to local organizations and charities. The salvation army and other organizations can only do so much.
Free education will attract people who are not suited for college to apply, decrease the value of a college education, and will be a costly burden for taxpayers who will be forced to foot the bill, therefore college must me paid for by the individual student. To begin with, there are a variety of students who are not suited for college. According to “Civitas Institute”, making college free, means everyone and anyone can go.
According to King’s argument, safeguarding freedom requires that we live up to the promises made in the Declaration of Independence. Segregation is not consistent with freedom because segregation is a barrier to education and thus to man’s pursuit of “liberty” and “happiness.” Freedom is brotherhood, peace, and racial harmony. Freedom is being judged not “by the color of [one’s] skin but by the content of [one’s] character”. To King, freedom is equality. In his landmark “I Have a Dream” speech, King draws on the Declaration of Independence “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” Before considering the Civil Rights Movement, it is imperative to understand that public freedom is predicated on the belief that all men (meaning all humans, females alike) are equal before the law.
The federal government should not pay for two years of community college. The cost is too high and there are better ways to help students to successfully attend and graduate from community colleges. There are too many hurdles and cost differences among states for the government to provide free tuition. Current scholarships and grants are already in place to help low-income students. Ways other than just free tuition may be more effective in both motivating and in helping students succeed in college.
Without taxes imposed to people, most of the people may be will work and spend the money based only on their preferences. Taxes on income may discourage people to go for work and so the economy will produce less too. The example for being not neutral in tax is when sales are taxes on only services but not on goods purchased, people will consider buying more goods than services. So that it is important for government to choose tax bases that have little effect by the imposition of taxes. Elasticity A good tax system must be elastic.