ipl-logo

Mandatory Non-Denominational Prayer In Schools Case Study

528 Words3 Pages

A group of parents and students challenged the New York State Board of Regents mandatory non-denominational prayer in school. A parent sued the school, arguing that law had violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Engel claimed that the prayer violated the 1st amendment, freedom of religion. Plaintiff being Steven I. Engel, defendant as William J. Vitale. This was located at Herricks School District argued on April 3, 1962. Finally it was decided June 25, 1962, of a Conclusion 6-1 decision towards Engel.

A parent sued the school of the New York State Board of Regents mandatory non-denominational prayer in school. The parent said the law violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. You cannot force religion upon someone or a group of people. You need Freedom of religion and you cannot say or tell someone to do this or to make them do something they don’t wish to do. Also freedom of speech as you can say what you believe in and why. …show more content…

The Regents ' prayer quite simply and clearly violated the 1st Amendment and should, therefore, be barred from the schools. The school had replied with the New York Regents did not establish a religion by providing a prayer for those who wanted to say it. Countless religious affairs are associated with the government. Reflecting the religious heritage of the nation. New York acted properly and constitutionally in providing an optional, nonsectarian prayer. It would be an intrusion into State matters for the Supreme Court to strike down the right of the Regents to compose the prayer and encourage its

Show More
Related

  • Earley Vs Dicenso Case Study

    312 Words  | 2 Pages

    (2) Background Information As well as the lawsuit filed by Alton Lemon, this incident involved two other cases that fell under the same issue, Earley v. DiCenso and Robinson v. DisCenso. Both conflicts involved a state law passed, through the Non- public Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1968, by the state of Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. This act gave the government permission to fund religious based or parochial schools. Although the schools provided textbooks and instructional materials for secular subjects, a Pennsylvania instructor believed that this act violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” Lemon argued that that by providing this money

    Read More

  • Mccreary County V. ACLU Case Study

    1108 Words  | 5 Pages

    First, was displaying the Ten Commandments in courthouses and public schools a violation of the First Amendment?s establishment clause that prevents the government from passing laws in favor of any religion (Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, 2004a)? Secondly, was an assumption that the purpose of these displays had been for promoting religion enough of a determination for prohibition (Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, 2004a)? With a dissenting opinion on the matter, Justice Scalia first tells how he was in Rome, Italy on September 11, 2001. The President of the United States gave an address to the nation, ending it with ?

    Read More

  • Engel V Vitale Summary

    145 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Supreme Court case of Engel v. Vitale’s decision was based on the establishment clause. The case of Engel v. Vitale struck down state organized prayer in school. The prayer had government endorsement and was thus considered unconstitutional. The Supreme Court case of Oregon v. Smith used the free exercise clause the basis of their decision.

    Read More

  • Engel V. Vitale: Prayer In The Public School

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    Engel v. Vitale: Prayer in the Public Schools is a book written by Julia C. Loren. Loren’s main purpose for writing this book is to inform us about the history of the Engel v. Vitale trial, an important trial which determined that prayer was not acceptable in the public schools quote as the book says the “In 1962, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down one of its most controversial decisions of the twentieth century.” In this book, Loren was not bias towards either Engel’s or Vitale’s side of the case as she did not appear to be very fond of one particular side and gave information regarding both sides of the case. With that being said, I would highly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in history or even the Engel v. Vitale case itself because the author was very straightforward in telling about both sides of the case without leaving anything out. Engel v. Vitale:

    Read More

  • Abington SD Vs. Schempp Case Study

    578 Words  | 3 Pages

    It all started when Edward Schempp, a resident of Abington, Pennsylvania filed a suit against the Abington School District to prohibit the enforcement of requiring children to hear and read portions of the Bible as part of their education. Schempp’s children attended the school and felt it was not right and against their religious freedoms. He and his family are also Unitarians. The case was lost at the Federal district court level, which then with hopes of Schempp dropping it, the school with parental consent aloud kids to opt out of it, but Schempp was still not pleased. This case seemed to cause difficult and social issues like no other.

    Read More

  • The Board Of Regents: Engel Vs Vitale

    457 Words  | 2 Pages

    Engel v. Vitale The Board of Regents for the state of New York authorized the students to say a volutary prayer and the pledge of allegience at the beginning of each day. The parents of the pupils disagreed to this because it is violating Ammendment 1. The parents sued the schools because it violated the freedom of religion granted to them. The case was decided in Warren court in 1962, the petitoner was Steven I. Engel, et al.

    Read More

  • Lum V. Rice Case Study

    1170 Words  | 5 Pages

    Notаbly absent from the opinion, as it was in Plessy, is any citаtion to a Supreme Court cаse that considered whether the prаctice of segregating schools was a violation of the Fourteenth Аmendment. It was an open question for the Court. The Court аdmitted that the precedent to which it cited involved discriminаtion between whites and blacks rаther thаn other rаces. However, the Court found no аppreciable difference here—"the decision is within the discretion of the state in regulating its public schools, and does not conflict with the Fourteenth Аmendment."

    Read More

  • Engel V. Vitale Summary

    426 Words  | 2 Pages

    The reasoning behind that decision was that the provision allowing students to absent themselves from that activity did not make that law constitutional. The purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). Justice Douglas concurred with what the court had found. He took a broader view of the Establishment Clause, arguing that any type of public promotion of religion, including giving financial aid to religious schools, violates the establishment clause (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). I would agree with this decision in some ways, but there are some that I do not agree with.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Edwards Vs Aguillard

    572 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this court case, the state of Louisiana made a law that forbade the teaching of the theory of evolution in public schools unless the school were to teach the theory of creationism as well (“Edwards”). Though the law did not require the teaching of either of the theories, it did require one of the other if schools did decide to teach it (“Edwards”). Parents, teachers, and religious leaders seeked to prevent the forcing of this law (“Edwards”). Andrew Koppelman, the author of “Phony Originalism and the Establishment Clause,” says, “States are prohibited from

    Read More

  • Westside Community Schools Case Study

    660 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The students alleged that Westside 's refusal violated the Equal Access Act, which requires that schools in receipt of federal funds provide "equal access" to student groups seeking to express "religious, political, philosophical, or other content" messages” (Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens by and Through Mergens). Many still argue today that Westside 's prohibition against the Christian club, consistent with the Establishment Clause, makes the Equal Access Act unconstitutional.

    Read More

  • Engel V Vitale Essay

    1485 Words  | 6 Pages

    Taking place in 1962, Engel v. Vitale was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that raised the issue of school-sponsored prayer in public schools. Steven Engel, a New York parent, along with a group of other parents, was completely against any sort of prayer, whether voluntary or not, in public schools. Engel, a person of Jewish faith, and his group were supported by various Jewish organizations in their fight against the New Hyde Park school board. William Vitale, the president of this school board, was supported by twenty-two states through an amicus curiae brief. The case spurred from Vitale and other parents’ concerns with the fact that every day, after reciting the pledge of allegiance, students of New York State schools were given the option to recite a prayer,

    Read More

  • Establishment Clause Of The First Amendment

    440 Words  | 2 Pages

    - [ ] Chapter 2 of the education consolidation improvement act of 1981 does not violate Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Chapter 2 of the education consolidation improvement act of 1981, says that all primary and secondary schools should be funded. Some of the private schools are religious so this includes all public, private, and religious schools. -[] Chapter 2 of the education consolidation improvement act of 1981 does not violate Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, because of neutral law. Neutral law means that you have an impartial unbiased system of law.

    Read More

  • Government-Written Prayer Should Not Be Interpreted In Public Schools

    2001 Words  | 9 Pages

    Vitale. The case of Engel v. Vitale was brought up by a group of families from New Hyde park, New York, they were up against the voluntary prayer written by the state board to God, in other words, the study board wrote a Christian prayer up for public students who wants it. A group of parent under their leader Steven Engel(a jihadist) were not Christians and they believed this prayer contradicted their religion, they argued opening a public school with such prayer violates the clause of the first Amendment and the fourteenth amendment. At the end of this case, the court ruled government- written prayers may not be recited in public schools because it violates the first amendment. However these public school students were given a choice they were not forced to pray this prayer, moreover, this particular prayer was not sponsored by taxpayer’s money.

    Read More

  • Engel V Vitale

    650 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1951, the following prayer was written that was intended to be recited each morning as part of the regents’ Statement of Moral and Spiritual Training in the Schools: “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our country.” Because the regents made the recitation of the prayer each day entirely optional to the school boards and the individual families of students, many New York school districts shunned the prayer because of their eclectic student bodies. Not only was the state religiously and ethnically diverse, but religious instruction in state schools was declared unconstitutional by the 1948 Supreme Court decision in the McCollum vs. Board of Education case. Because of the constantly increasing controversy about religious teaching in public schools, at least 90% of New York districts were not using the prayer by the late 1950s. Then, in 1958, five parents (of varying religions and ethnicities) of students within the district filed a lawsuit to stop the use of the prayer in their schools.

    Read More

  • What Is The Supreme Court Case Of Lemon Vs Kurtzman

    753 Words  | 4 Pages

    The state of Pennsylvania had violated the U.S constitution by passing the Non-public Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1968. This act allowed Pennsylvania to be the first state to aid Nonpublic schools directly. As described through the act, "Aid is restricted to teachers' salaries and to textbooks and instructional materials in the fields of mathematics, modern foreign languages, physical education, and physical science. " The law was violating the first amendment according to Lemon favoring one religion above the rest. It is stated that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Read More

More about Mandatory Non-Denominational Prayer In Schools Case Study

Open Document