Also, I will be explaining what the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was. January of 1854 Sen. Stephen Douglas wrote a bill that would divide the land in the west of Missouri into two states Nebraska and Kansas. Douglas wanted popular sovereignty for both states; this would allow the residents of the two states to vote on if slavery would be legal in new states. Groups against slavery were against Douglas’s push for popular sovereignty, because without the ability to vote slavery would not be allowed in the new
Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 Throughout the ideas of sectionalism within the Northern and Southern states, The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 has caused a division within borders, paved the way for the issue of slavery to increase, and the result of Bleeding Kansas. The issue between the borders had to be resolved, as to the decision of Kansas becoming a free or slave state. President Abraham Lincoln spoke out against the idea, “Lincoln laid out his objections to the Act and resurrected his political career in a brilliant speech at Peoria on October 16, 1854”. (Monroe, R.D.) Lincoln also wondered how it was morally right to treat people based off of popular vote, “Lincoln criticized popular sovereignty, questioning how it was that this doctrine
Have you ever wondered how we founded Kansas and Nebraska into America? Well it wasn’t as easy as just finding it and claiming it, it took a lot of controversy over slavery. The Nebraska Act was the one who really started a major argument over slavery and whether or not it should be in those states. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was important, it was significant to American History, and it led to the Civil War. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was significant to American history because it caused another party to form, and it led to the Civil War because it had split up the Union.
The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act, which allowed new territories to decide if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty (Civilwar.org, Kansas-Nebraska Act). Kansas-Nebraska Act negated the Missouri Compromise. Missouri Compromise was an effort by the congress to diffuse the political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri in 1819 for admission as a state in which supported slavery (Garraty and Foner). This was done to restore the balance of slave and free states at the time. Kansas-Nebraska Act violated the compromise that was made in the Missouri Compromise, it reignited the disagreement between the anti and pro-slavery factions, which lead to violent events.
Manifest Destiny is a unique, yet mysterious fundamental series of events in American history. No other country’s history contains such an eventful history as the United States. Amy Greenberg’s book, Manifest Destiny and American Territorial Expansion, provides documented evidence that settlers believed they were destined for expansion throughout the continent. In other words, many religious settlers believed that it was a call from God for the United States to expand west. On the other hand, people believed that Manifest Destiny vindicated the war against Mexico.
America’s urgency and continuous interest to expand Westward helped drive the idea of “Manifest Destiny” within the budding nation. Within the early 1800s Americans believed that it was right and justified to expand west and claim the unorganized area to the west. Manifest Destiny helped to drive the young and evolving nation of America by creating changes within its political system, its societal ideologies, and its ever-expanding economy. In the late 1700s to early 1800s politics was mainly influenced by the realm of the wealthier, upper class; politicians would attempt to grab the attention and endorsement of men who owned large amounts of land and money.
The North, which were anti-slavery, argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in the new state. Meanwhile, the South,which were pro-slavery, believed that states, rather than the government, should have the right to decide whether they wanted slavery or not therefore they argued that the State of Missouri had the right to decide whether they wanted to be a slave state or not and that it should not be up to the Congress to decide. In an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise which allowed Missouri to be a slave state and allowed Maine into the Union as a free state to resolve crisis, which a member of Congress, Henry Clay, offered. The history surrounding the nineteenth century led to the establishment of the Missouri
The Kansas Nebraska Act was a bill in 1854 that mandated "popular sovereignty." This allowed people settling in a territory to decide whether to have slavery or not within their borders. This Act was proposed by Stephan A.Douglas. Douglas was also Abraham Lincoln's opponent in the Lincoln-Douglas debates. The bill overturned the boundary by latitude to separate slave territory and free territory. "
Moreover, there was much trouble in Kansas such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that two states, Kansas and Nebraska would be made up out of what was left of the Louisiana Purchase. These two territories could decide if they about slavery. Later, the people of Kansas wanted to separate their state into antislavery and pro-slavery groups. In March of 1855, elections for this idea began.
Such collapse was due to the Kansas Nebraska act 1854 which was introduced by a democratic senator from Illinoi named Stephan A Douglas. The act was brought about due to The Missouri compromise 1820, the compromise was made to balance the number of free states and slave states, it allowed slavery in Missouri but made it off limits in the remaining federally administered Louisiana territory. In source 1.0 it shows how the states were divided, the green states are the free states, which were closed to slavery, and the orange states are the slave states, which were open to slavery. The Missouri compromise was considered inconvenient for Douglas, as an advocate of western expansion he wanted to build a transcontinental railroad. Going against the Missouri compromise he believed for the railroad to work, the territories in which the railroad passed through would have to be formally organised.
The goal of this act was to make the people of those countries vote and decide to be free or slave. Nebraska is Brown’s birthplace. This solution of Kansas-Nebraska Act failed because it created competition between antislavery and proslavery. Therefore, they established a war and bloodshed between the two proslavery and antislavery. In 1885, a pro-slavery from Missourians came to Kansas; said that they would vote for slave and kill anyone else who do not vote for the slave.
At the turn of 1861, the Northern and Southern states in the U.S had their own foundations, morals and concerns on certain issues which contributed to the American Civil War from 1861 – 1865. The clash was more than a battle between two armies, it was a war waged between two societies. A major factor to the belief that the North and South were unable to coexist as a single nation was the emergence of sectionalism where the South depended on slavery to fuel their economy. Another dichotomous line that confirmed the two sides of the U.S as completely inconsistent with one another, was the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 which resulted in the authorisation of White Americans to re-capture slaves who previously fled their oppressed position. The Kansas-Nebraska
According to the “Kansas-Nebraska Act,” “When the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was passed, the Missouri compromise was repealed (They got rid of the rule). The act organized the Kansas-Nebraska territories on the principle of popular sovereignty” (1). This means that while the new act would allow the people to vote to be a slave or free state this means that the Missouri 36°30 line would be ignored and the North would get angered. It states, “A bitter contest followed between pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters for the control of Kansas. Between 50 and 200 people died during the fighting” (Kansas-Nebraska Act, 1).
Throughout history there have been many wars, most of which, in some way or another, have had to do with expansion and the gain of land or territory. During the era of Manifest Destiny there were many reasons for expansion such as; better agricultural resources and other events that erupted exploitation and manipulation of the Indians and indigenous people. These show how the Manifest Destiny era expansions were similar to many other expansions before and after this era, however, the biggest difference is how, before, they would purchase land or legally obtain it, when after, the United States would go to war over land rather than legally buy it. Before Manifest Destiny, during colonial days, Britain established the Proclamation of 1763,
The rise of America has always been based on Imperialism, whether it was intentional or not. There were many motivations and consequences that came with American expansionism. America was obsessed with conquering and moving west, and would go to any means to acquire the land. America is very imperialistic, which means “the advocacy and practice of extending national power and control over other areas territorially, economically, and politically” (LP 339), which is what America thrived on. Americas used the Manifest Destiny as justification, saying that it was that God intended them to do and that expansionism was their Godly duty.
