Manipulation Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Brutus kills his best friend, Caesar, because he doesn’t want him to be king. He claims he is doing it for the people of Rome because Caesar was too “ambitious”. Antony uses different techniques in his speech to manipulate with the crowd’s emotions and change their minds about him. He tells the crowd that he is not disproving Brutus but throughout his speech he does. He has the crowd gather around Caesar’s dead body and the crowd is so upset, they don’t know what to think at this point. Antony successfully convinces the crowd that Caesar was wrong. The plebeians turn into a mob against the conspirators. Antony says “ I have come to bury Caesar, not praise him.” He’s trying not to make people want to kill him, he wants the people to be on his …show more content…
He says “If you have tears, prepare to shed them now.” Antony points out that the first time Caesar wore his mantle, he was challenging Nervii. Reminding them on Caesar’s glory and what was taken away from him. Antony also points out that there are tears in the mantle. He’s making them feel sad, looking back on the good times Caesar had. He makes the crowd feel the pain and sorrow that Caesar felt. The act that Antony says “burst Caesar’s mighty heart,” was to see Brutus, his best friend stab him, that’s what killed him. Antony suggests that if he had the speaking abilities of Brutus, then the stones of Rome would rise in mutiny. When the crowd is about to leave, Antony makes them stay and says what is left in Caesar’s will. Antony has planted mutiny and rebellion into their minds, and now they’re going to mutiny. He does all this for vengeance. He finally tells them what’s in Caesar’s will, he didn’t tell them before because it’s just one final nail in the conspirator’s coffins. This shows that he has been scheming all along. After Antony’s speech, they kill Cinna the poet, which shows that they will no longer listen to anyone of
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
754 Words | 4 PagesHowever, later on, Antony intentionally tells the mob that “hearing the will of Caesar...will inflame you/…” and that it is good that “you know not that you are his heirs/…” (III, ii, 145-148). By purposely saying the context of the will, Antony is able to manipulate the crowd to riot against the conspirators and seek revenge for Caesar by appealing to the emotional feeling of anger. By appealing to feelings such as guilt, sympathy, and anger, Antony uses pathos to manipulate the crowd to his
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices
810 Words | 4 PagesIn act 3 scene 2 of Julius Caesar, Brutus addresses the crowd regarding the assassination of Julius Caesar performed by a group of conspirators with himself included. When Brutus is done speaking to the citizens it is clear that most if not all, are on his side and believe that killing Caesar was necessary for Rome to prosper. Brutus exits, leaving Antony alone to say a few words about Caesar. It is what he says through an array of different techniques and devices, that convince the plebeians to rise against Brutus and the conspirators and take revenge of Caesar behalf. The very first technique used in Antony's speech is equalizing the relationship between himself and Rome’s citizens.
Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar
611 Words | 3 PagesCome I to speak in Caesars' funeral" (act 3 scene 2) this can show that Antony is not above the plebeians, since he had to have permission to speak, he's one of the commoners. He also uses ethos by saying " He was my friend, faithful and just to me." (act3 scene 2) antony says this to make Caesar look like a really good guy, to make sure the commoners know that Caesar was loyal and a good friend to Antony. This also makes Brutus and the rest of the conspirators look like they killed Caesar just to do it, for no good
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices Essay
1258 Words | 6 PagesAntony’s speech is strong because he uses emotionally charged rhetoric in order to manipulate with the position of the audience. At the beginning of the speech the audience stands completely by the Brutus’s side: Fourth Citizen: “Twere best he speak no harm of Brutus here”. First Citizen: “This Caesar was a tyrant” (Act III, scene II). Antony’s speech begins by justifying the actions of Brutus. It seems so because the speaker uses the device of contrast: I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.
Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar
692 Words | 3 PagesAs he started to speak again, he attempted to anger the crowd, and point their anger towards the conspirators. He indirectly suggests that they should think of mutiny of rage, and intrigues the crowd by speaking of his will. Upon hearing how much love Caesar had for them, their feelings all turned to hatred for the conspirators. With this, Antony had succeeded in swaying his audience to his
Antony Speech Vs Brutus's
443 Words | 2 PagesAntony tells facts, “implementing logic”, that the people have witnessed and that’s why his speech is better than Brutus’s. Antony giving facts that the people know of using lothos, ethos, and pathos in his speech was a great way for his speech to be much better than Brutus’s. As Brutus is speaking about Caesar during his funeral he remind the people that they did love him indeed, but what Brutus has done is far greater than what Caesar would have done. “did love him once, not without cause: What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?” (2.2.30-31).
Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar
417 Words | 2 PagesAntony was trying to show Caesar was a man who cared about the people of Rome and his murder was unjust. All of these
Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesAntony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesBy refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.
Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar
671 Words | 3 PagesIn Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech
617 Words | 3 PagesAntony wanted people to be patient with him. He also says, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (3.2. 100-101). Antony says this to show that Caesar was a good man who cared about the people. It was also to show that Brutus was wrong when he stated that Caesar was ambitious. Antony makes the citizens feel that the conspirators murder was
Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis
754 Words | 4 PagesIn this scene Caesar has been murdered by the conspirators including Brutus. Brutus is one of Caesar's good friends who is driven by honor; who thought Caesar’s ambition was going to be the end of Rome. Antony is a very loyal friend of Caesar’s who does not agree with the conspirators. Brutus and Antony are both smart well thought out characters. They desire to persuade the commoners to their side of the situation.
Ethical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesBrutus wants to make the crowd feel like he is in a way the victim. In order to do that he says "As Caesar loved me I weep for him" so in a way the people feel bad for him. This emotional appeal did not persuade the audience considering the fact that he was if he truly did love Caesar as much as he said he would, then he would have tried to find a different route in getting rid of Caesar as emperor. Antony goes with the approach of making the people of Rome feel guilty. He tells the citizens "You all love him once not without cause what cause withholds you then to mourn for him" so they could reflect on their attitude towards his death.
What Is The Persuasion In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesAntony describes how much Caesar loved Brutus, and how upset he was when he was stabbed by his best friend — “Judge, O you gods, how dearly Caesar loved him! This was the most unkindest cut of all; for when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors arms,” (3.1.181-184) He uses negative words like “traitor,” and “ingratitude,” to appeal to their emotions and convince the Romans that Caesar didn’t deserve to be stabbed. Having established Caesar's faithfulness, Antony was then able to build on the guilt that the crowd felt for having believed Brutus— “Whilst bloody treason flourish’d over us. O, now you weep; and, I perceive...
Analyzing Brutus's Speech In 'Julius Caesar'
922 Words | 4 PagesAfter bringing out Caesar 's Dead body. Describing what a honorable man his was. And showing them how brutal his killing was. In act three the people are angered and overwhelmed the people kill an innocent man simply because he had the same name as one of the conspirators cinna . the complete chaos ensures rhom may not look seem like a positive reaction to antony 's speech but it is in fact what he wants which is shown through soliloquy through the lack of almost no reaction to brutus logical and ineffective speech it is obvious that antony 's speech is more effective over the people of rome as speeches as a whole this shows that emotional appeal causes a much bigger reaction than logic and reason.
More about Manipulation Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
754 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Devices
810 Words | 4 PagesUse Of Ethos In Julius Caesar
611 Words | 3 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Devices Essay
1258 Words | 6 PagesExamples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar
692 Words | 3 PagesAntony Speech Vs Brutus's
443 Words | 2 PagesEthos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar
417 Words | 2 PagesAntony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesUse Of Pathos In Julius Caesar
671 Words | 3 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech
617 Words | 3 PagesJulius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis
754 Words | 4 PagesEthical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesWhat Is The Persuasion In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesAnalyzing Brutus's Speech In 'Julius Caesar'
922 Words | 4 Pages