Manisha Tagi V Deepak Malaysia Case Summary
2) FACTS OF THE CASE:
In this case, an army officer, and an advocate, had got married according to Hindu rites on 17.11.1991. However, they soon fell apart, and started living separately since 31.12.1992. The husband filed a petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty, before the District court of Gurgaon under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The husband alleged that the wife was rude, ill- mannered, quarrelsome and schizophrenic, and she had made his life a living hell. He alleged that she shouted and made scenes and humiliated him in front of his officers and jawans, made allegations of sodomy against him, and allegations against his old and infirm father of molesting her. Besides, the husband also alleged that the wife filed various criminal cases against him, which ended in either his acquittal, discharge, or were quashed, thereby indicating that they were all false. Further, that she hurled filthy abuses
…show more content…
Capt Deepak Kumar is a matrimonial case with a chequered history which indicates element of subjectivity in judicial approach in the same set of circumstances. Firstly, the trial and appellate courts found that the husband could not establish that his wife had treated him with cruelty, and thus divorce could not be granted. The middle path of judicial separation was adopted. However, the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted divorce, and concluded that the acts of the wife amounted to cruelty. The Division Bench completely ignored the findings of the two previous courts, and held the wife’s acts as cruelty towards husband. The court granted divorce to the husband, and by doing so, in a way responded as if the husband had appealed against judicial separation. Thus, the Supreme Court aptly reversed the order of the Division Bench, and upheld the granting of judicial separation by the single judge of the High Court, as the Division Bench had no need to justify their reversal of judicial separation, and grant
Marshard V. Grasing Case Summary
350 Words | 2 PagesCOMPLAINT This matter was opened by bar counsel on January 25, 2017. In or about December 2016, while preparing for hearing on B.B.O. File Nos. C5-14-0055 and C5-16-0008, bar counsel learned that the respondent, Laura Marshard, an assistant district attorney in the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office, had allegedly provided information concerning an ongoing police investigation to the target of the investigation. Bar counsel also learned that Marshard allegedly violated the Rules of Professional Conduct while handling a criminal complaint.
Summary Of State V Mark Ducic
1071 Words | 5 PagesIn the case State v. Mark Ducic, Mark is on trial for the murders of Barbra Davis and Donald (Don). Ducic had allegedly murdered Barbra for thinking she was going to tell the police about him dealing drugs, and Don for being the only witness to the murder. When Barbra died, her body was found with numerous drugs in her system and later her friend, Don was found dead too. When the coroner first received the bodies, she believed they had died to accidental overdoses, then after reviewing the police reports changed her mind to homicides that were done out through strategic planning. Ducic was said to have mixed oxycontin with other drugs to create a “hot shot” to make the drug injection look like an overdose.
What Is The Case Of Johnson V. Laverkin City Case Brief
544 Words | 3 PagesSomehow, her husband found out about the affair and notified her supervisors that she had been raped. Chief Seegmiller conducted an investigation and realized that the affair was consensual and she received no punishment for her actions. This angered her husband, so he made another false allegation. This time he said that Johnson and Chief Seegmiller were involved in an affair together.
Ford Motor Credit Co. 2d 956
525 Words | 3 PagesHolding: (What rule, definition or standard did the court use to resolve the dispute?) Kirkpatricks ' complaint against Transamerica Insurance Company adequately states a cause of action, in which the court reversed the lower courts decision and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the appellate courts
Tarrasa V. Brenden Case
473 Words | 2 PagesBrenden was put in jail for admitting he helped Steven with the murder of Tarrasa. When Brenden was arrested some of Stevens family turned on him. Brenden’s mom believed he was influenced by his 43-year-old uncle to do bad things. On March 31st Steven is interviewed by the associated press discussing his nephew. Steven tries to send a message to his nephew through the news.
Dbq Ali Supreme Court Case
220 Words | 1 PagesThe Supreme Court stated, since the board gave no explanation behind the foreswearing of a conscientious objector exemption, and it is difficult to decide on which of the three grounds offered in the Justice's letter that board depended, Ali's 1967 conviction must be overturned. The Incomparable Court choice was passed on June 28, 1971. As per that record, Marshall had reaccused himself on the grounds that he had been U.S. Specialist General when the case started, and the staying eight judges at first voted 5 to 3 to maintain Ali's conviction. Nonetheless, Harlan, relegated to compose the lion's share assessment, got to be persuaded that Ali's case to be a noncombatant was genuine subsequent to perusing foundation material on Black Muslim
Appeal Of The Queen V. Danny Lalumiere Case
1100 Words | 5 PagesThe case prosecuted under the court of Appeal of Ontario, Her Majesty the Queen v Danny Lalumiere, in 2011, was intended to appeal the conviction of counseling to commit murder. The appellant argued that the life sentence was not appropriate and was outside the range of sentences imposed on similar offenders for similar offenses. This is an example of a case where legal guilt was used to provide a conviction. The conviction of the appellant was based on the testimony of a psychiatrist doctor, Dr. Pallandi, who provided a profile of the accused and concluded that the appellant was pathologically predisposed to commit an offense. The appellate court ruled against the Crown’s decision at the trial, stating that the appellant lacked moral culpability for his offenses and therefore the sentence was not deserved.
Korematsu Case Law
438 Words | 2 PagesJudge Marilyn Patel concluded that the writ was granted on the grounds that “there was substantial support in the record that the government deliberately omitted relevant information and provided misleading information in papers before the court”. (Ducat, 204). Judge Patel overturned the Korematsu’s prior conviction on factual error on any error of law in the 1944 ruling. In August of 1988,
Examples Of Adnan Syed Casey
521 Words | 3 PagesThe court got the idea that Adnan is just like other Pakistani Muslim men, that he had connections and can get away with murder. Another piece of information is,”in some cultures women are second class citizens… He just wanted power and she wouldn't give it”(223). These stereotypes are being used against Adnan and make him look like a typical Muslim who abused females. Yet his classmates never said he had acted that way toward anyone.
Rashid Ahmed Case Summary
610 Words | 3 PagesRashid Ahmed Guided Reflection Questions Opening Questions How did the simulated experience of Rashid Ahmed’s case make you feel? Overall, the simulation case of Mr. Ahmed was a positive experience that makes me feel in control and challenged by the situation. I perform multiple nursing skills and acknowledge acquired during lectures. For example, in reference to fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance information, I was able to identify the needs of a dehydrated patient.
Summary Of The Massie-Kahahawai Case
1309 Words | 6 PagesCan we truly define racism in such a way that it is all-inclusive and understandable? Ruth Wilson Gilmore gives her definition of racism as the “state-sanctioned or extralegal production and exploitation of group-differentiated vulnerability to premature death in distinct but densely interconnected political geographies”. While this may seem difficult to understand, the best way to grasp her definition is through comparison to a real world situation, such as the infamous Massie rape trial and consequential murder of Joseph Kahahawai. The alleged rape of a white woman in Hawai’i, Thalia Massie, and her family’s murder of native Joseph Kahahawai captured nationwide attention in 1931. Not only does this case show how America’s racial hierarchy
Ethics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital
503 Words | 3 PagesAt the end of this case, the court had this to
Why Is Hammurabi Bad
299 Words | 2 PagesHammurabi 4,000 years ago man named Hammurabi ruled for 42 years he was King of Babylon. He ruled much of 1,000,000 people. In his 38th year of ruler Hammurabi made 282 laws called a code of stele. He did this to bring fairness to all. there has been some debate about the justness of this code In my opinion, hammurabi code was not just because of its family law, property law and personal injury law.
Role Of Judiciary In Malaysia
1103 Words | 5 PagesMalaysian judiciary refers to the Malaysian court system. It is an independent body separate from the legislative and executive arms of government. The role of courts is to ensure the law and order are followed, that justice is done, and criminals are punished. The head of the judiciary is the Chief Justice.
Importance Of Stare Decisis In Malaysia
814 Words | 4 PagesJust as in other countries, the law in Malaysia can be found not only in legislation, but also in cases decided by the courts. The courts in question are the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal, and the two High Courts. This is because only decisions of superior courts are sources of law as they are the courts that decide on matters of law whereas lower courts generally discuss on matters of fact. Decisions of the higher courts are binding to the lower courts which is known as stare decisis. Stare decisis is a latin term which means to stand by what has been decided.
More about Manisha Tagi V Deepak Malaysia Case Summary
Marshard V. Grasing Case Summary
350 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of State V Mark Ducic
1071 Words | 5 PagesWhat Is The Case Of Johnson V. Laverkin City Case Brief
544 Words | 3 PagesFord Motor Credit Co. 2d 956
525 Words | 3 PagesTarrasa V. Brenden Case
473 Words | 2 PagesDbq Ali Supreme Court Case
220 Words | 1 PagesAppeal Of The Queen V. Danny Lalumiere Case
1100 Words | 5 PagesKorematsu Case Law
438 Words | 2 PagesExamples Of Adnan Syed Casey
521 Words | 3 PagesRashid Ahmed Case Summary
610 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of The Massie-Kahahawai Case
1309 Words | 6 PagesEthics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital
503 Words | 3 PagesWhy Is Hammurabi Bad
299 Words | 2 PagesRole Of Judiciary In Malaysia
1103 Words | 5 PagesImportance Of Stare Decisis In Malaysia
814 Words | 4 Pages